From John Hammell (<jham@iahf.com> International Advocates
for Health Freedom:)
http://educate-yourself.org/cn/2001/CNcodexclosinginonEU30sep01.shtml
Nov. 29, 2001
[Notes From John Hammell
I am in touch with Ralph Pike of the National Assn of Health Stores
in the UK about this article as well as with Josef Hasslberger of
the health freedom group La Leva di Archimede in Italy. They are developing
a new EU strategy to continue fighting back against the EU Vitamin Directive,
which threatens to destroy health freedom all over Europe, harmonizing
England and Holland's much less restrictive vitamin laws, to Germany's.
I will be posting that strategy soon.
Americans had better wake up to the fact that we will eventually face
the same fate as the EU via Codex harmonization unless we work VERY HARD
to pass the American Sovereignty Restoration Act HR 1146 which will
remove us from the UN and all UN affiliated bodies, including the Codex
Alimentarius Commission. Earlier today I sent an emailed response to ongressman
Boucher (my congressman) explaining why he is in error when he attempts
to claim that "we participate in UN sponsored activities only when it serves
our interests and only on such terms as are agreeable to us." In his response
to my letter, Boucher stated that UN dictates have no binding effect on
the US, but since the advent of the Uruguay Round of GATT which created
the WTO, this is no longer true, and I provided him with PROOF of
this.
Unless a lot more people assist me in trying to get cosponsors on
HR 1146, The American Sovereignty Restoration Act, we could face the
same plight as vitamin manufacturers and consumers across the EU. Please
join me in taking action! Please forward this to more people! Please contribute
to IAHF to help us serve you better! IAHF POB 625 Floyd VA 24091 USA or
via paypal at http://www.iahf.com Thank you!
(Forward courtesy of Chris Gupta < mbgupta@uwo.ca>)]
Vitamins and Freedom of Choice
BY TINA BURCHILL
SEPTEMBER 25, 2001
The London Times
An EU directive could outlaw high-dose vitamins and minerals High-dose
vitamins and minerals, used by about 12 million people in the UK for illnesses
ranging from colds to heart disease, are under threat by a EU directive
that could see them outlawed.
The aim is to standardise the market, but many European countries
regard anything above the Recommended Daily Allowance (RDA) as a drug.
This has led to the rise of a black market through which hundreds of thousands
of people buy supplements from the UK and The Netherlands by mail order
and the Internet.
Here, Consumers for Health Choice (CHC), an alliance of consumers, practitioners,
retailers and manufacturers, say that 21per cent of the population consults
an alternative practitioner regularly, many of whom treat patients with
supplements. "Theeffect could be devastating," says Harry Masterton-Smith,
the chairman of the CHC. "High-dose supplements are often a lastresort
for people when no one else has found answers."
Guila Quintarelli, 28, an osteopath, developed chronic fatigue syndrome
as a student. She spent six months almost house-bound before turning to
a kinesiologist, who identified imbalances by testing muscle impulses.
She was treated with high doses of nutrients and within weeks was back
at college. "All doctors could offer were anti-depressants," she says.
"For the first three months I was bed-ridden. Walking for five minutes
felt like a marathon. I don't know what I would have done without the supplements."
Thousands of studies have shown the efficacy of high-dose vitamins and
minerals. One of the leading exponents for their use incardiovascular disease
is the US-based author Dr Matthias Rath, who has conducted clinical trials
on the use of supplements. One of his studies indicated that a supplement
programme, including high-dose vitamin C used over a year, slowed the growth
of artery-clogging plaque in early coronary artery disease.
The UK supplements industry follows a set of guidelines under which
the upper safe levels of nutrients have been defined afterscientific analysis
of research data. The Food Standards Agency (FSA), on behalf of the Government,
believes the safety issueshould be at the core of the directive, but many
countries are pushing for the maximum limits to be based on RDAs rather
thanupper safe levels.
Rosemary Hignett, the head of food labelling at the FSA, says: "Safety
is the key issue. Restricting levels of vitamins and minerals other than
on safety grounds is unnecessary and limits consumer choice."
An expert group on vitamins and minerals is reviewing the scientific
evidence for the FSA. The draft directive, as it stands, takes a broadly
safety-based approach, but does not include specific figures for each nutrient.
Limits will be set only after it is adopted.
The fear is that these limits will be very low. Until recently,
CHC remained positive as it lobbied MEPs. But that changed when an amendment
was proposed that, if adopted, would limit the upper levels of nutrients
to just five times the RDAs. Dr Derek Shrimpton, author of the report that
underpins the supplement industry's guidelines, has participated in the
discussions of the UK's expert group as an official observer. "Working
out the upper limits is a complicated business, but I would hope that there
is no reference to RDAs - it is fundamentally unsound," he says.
"Vitamin C is a good example. The RDA is 60mg, but over a few days there
would be no harm in taking 2,000mg daily to fight a cold."
CHC, which has 267,000 people on its mailing list, and the National
Association of Health Stores (NAHS), had their fears fuelled when the European
Scientific Committee on Food said that the upper safe level of Vitamin
B6 should be 25mg, when the current industry-imposed limit is 200mg. The
directive, as it stands, would reduce that by half.
The problem, says Ralph Pike, the director of the NAHS, is that the
committee relied on research that has been ridiculed by the scientific
community. "We fought this battle with the Government in 1998. The US National
Academy of Sciences decided that 200mg of vitamin B6 a day was safe."
Three million people take more than 25mg of vitamin B6 daily. It has
been the subject of clinical trials, and a review of its efficacy in the
treatment of premenstrual syndrome, led by Dr Katrina Wyatt, of the Academic
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology at North Staffordshire Hospital,
Stoke-on-Trent, concluded that doses up to 100mg daily are likely to be
of benefit in treating premenstrual symptoms and premenstrual depression.
"We're talking about freedom of choice," says Masterton-Smith."I'm allowed
to smoke myself to death or drink myself under the table, so why can't
I take perfectly safe vitamin and mineral supplements?"
Web posted at: http://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/0,,72-2001331779,00.html
All information posted on this web site is
the opinion of the author and is provided for educational purposes only.
It is not to be construed as medical advice. Only a licensed medical doctor
can legally offer medical advice in the United States. Consult the healer
of your choice for medical care and advice.