Current News | Introduction | Colloidal Silver | Chemtrails | Sylphs | Emerging Diseases | Forbidden Cures | Ozone | Immunity Boosting | Nutrition | Tone Gen By James DeMeo <demeo@mind.net>
In Pulse of the Planet #4 (1993, pages 163-164), I made the argument that the mammogram was dangerous to the health of women, that it did not reduce breast cancer but actually increased it, and that it was, in fact, part of a larger epidemic of willful ignorance on the part of modern medicine which proveably artificially increases the rates of breast cancer. The article attached below provides additional support for this depressing point of view. This epidemic of willful medical ignorance includes, but is not limited to, the following aspects: 1) Giving women's breasts x-radiation, which is known to cause cancer all by itself. Some doctors are so terribly ignorant about the x-radiation hazards of mammograms, or secretively full of hate and sadistic rage towards women (or both) that they order up mammograms to ignorant and compliant women every 6 months or so. I have met such women, heard their stories, and so know this is a fact. This is especially true if there is a "history of cancer" in the woman's family -- a history which might be caused by drinking the same carcinogen-contaminated water for several generations, or suffering the "doctor knows best" syndrome of unquestioning compliance to white-coated authority; this latter factor translates into mothers, sisters and daughters all getting regular mammograms, sometimes from the same family doctor. So, a higher proportion of such compliant families succumb to the radiation damage, which is misinterpreted as an "hereditary factor". 2) Giving women scientifically unproven and highly questionable "genetic screening" tests for the hypothetical "breast cancer gene", the predictive accuracy of which has never been demonstrated in long-term controlled, blinded studies using socio-economically balanced groups tracked over time, to see if they are accurate predictors of cancer, or not. Sometimes, women who are given such a test and flagged as "positive" are subjected to psychological terrorism about breast cancer, and brainwashed into having "preventative mastectomies" wherein perfectly healthy breasts are amputated by the whitecoats, who then step forward to claim how they have "saved another woman from the time-bomb of the breast cancer gene". It is all perfectly rationalized under the facade of white-coated hospital authoritarianism, but also perfectly insane, and perfectly barbaric, worse in its rationalizations in fact than female genital mutilation in Africa, which at least is undertaken for the "honest" motivation to "destroy female sexuality in society" (ie, to "tame the female sexual urge", to "cool down the woman"). Our whitecoats are today doing thousands of "preventative" breast mutilations every year, and the numbers are mixed in with ordinary breast cancer statistics, inflating the numbers. This factor alone may account for the claimed new "epidemic" of breast cancer. It is possible that as much as 20% of all breast surgeries done today
in the USA are "preventative" mutilations performed on healthy women --
I base this figure upon statements given on National Public Radio (Talk
of the Nation, Science Friday, 21 Aug. 1992), that 20% of Sloane-Kettering
Now comes the report below about cancer lies and cancer hype from the
American Cancer Society (is their function to increase cancer, or decrease
it??), which apparently now takes marketing advice from used car salesmen
(get 'em in the front door, however you can!) and a Canadian study on
James DeMeo, Ph.D.
[Our thanks to Chris Gupta <mbgupta@julian.uwo.ca> for forwarding
this article]
|