David Ray Griffin Seals Case for 9/11 WTC Demolition, Calls
on NY Times to End Coverup
[Editor's Note: This story is obviously very old hat if you're
a regular reader to this web site, but the majority of Americans are still
asleep when it comes to the depth of the treachery taking place within this
country, so they need to hear the truth from somewhere, even in tiny doses.
They don't know that the Pentagon, the Executive, the Judicial, and the
Legislative branches of government have sold them out to international corporate
satanists and foreign powers such as China,
Russia, and Germany whose troops-which now numbers in the MILLIONS here-
are roaming American soil at will. I just posted reports
of Russina troop convoys spotted in Montana and Washington state, and
now
heading into Louisana, accodring to dowser Phil Ledoux, to help with
the engineered "emergency" that will be taking place in Florida,
Georgia, Louisana, etc. from the HAARP driven Hurricanes (Wilma now, and
"Alpha" in a week or so)...Ken]
By David Ray Griffin
http://educate-yourself.org/cn/griffinonwtc21oct05.shtml
October 21, 2005
Forward courtesy of Suzanne Ward
Theologian Says Controlled Demolition is Now
a Fact, Not a Theory
In two speeches to overflow crowds in New York last weekend,
notable theologian David Ray Griffin argued that recently revealed evidence
seals the case that the Twin Towers and WTC-7 were destroyed by controlled
demolition with explosives. Despite the many enduring mysteries of the 9/11
attacks, Dr. Griffin concluded, "It is already possible to know, beyond
a reasonable doubt, one very important thing: the destruction of the World
Trade Center was an inside job, orchestrated by terrorists within our own
government."
On Oct. 15th and 16th, New Yorkers filled two venues to hear
the prominent theologian and author of two books on 9/11 give a presentation
entitled "The Destruction of the Trade Towers: A Christian Theologian
Speaks Out." Dr. Griffin has continued to blaze a trail of courage,
leading where most media and elected officials have feared to tread. His
presentation went straight to the core of one of the most powerful indictments
of the official story, the collapse of the towers and WTC 7.
Dr. Griffin included excerpts from the firemen's tapes which
were recently released as a result of a prolonged court battle led by victim's
families represented by attorney Norman Siegel and reported in the NY Times.
He also included statements by many witnesses. These sources gave ample
testimony giving evidence of explosions going off in the buildings. A 12
minute film was shown for the audiences, who saw for themselves the undeniable
evidence for controlled demolition.
Dr. Griffin listed ten characteristics of the collapses which
all indicate that the buildings did not fall due to being struck by planes
or the ensuing fires. He explained the buildings fell suddenly without any
indication of collapse. They fell straight into their own footprint at free-fall
speed, meeting virtually no resistance as they fell--a physical impossibility
unless all vertical support was being progressively removed by explosives
severing the core columns. The towers were built to withstand the impact
of a Boeing 707 and 160 mile per hour winds, and nothing about the plane
crashes or ensuing fires gave any indication of causing the kind of damage
that would be necessary to trigger even a partial or progressive collapse,
much less the shredding of the buildings into dust and fragments that could
drop at free-fall speed. The massive core columns--the most significant
structural feature of the buildings, whose very existence is denied in the
official 9/11 Commission Report--were severed into uniform 30 foot sections,
just right for the 30-foot trucks used to remove them quickly before a real
investigation could transpire. There was a volcanic-like dust cloud from
the concrete being pulverized, and no physical mechanism other than explosives
can begin to explain how so much of the buildings' concrete was rendered
into extremely fine dust. The debris was ejected horizontally several hundred
feet in huge fan shaped plumes stretching in all directions, with telltale
"squibs" following the path of the explosives downward. These
are all facts that have been avoided by mainstream and even most of the
alternative media. Again, these are characteristics of the kind of controlled
demolitions that news people and firefighters were describing on the morning
of 9/11. Those multiple first-person descriptions of controlled demolition
were hidden away for almost four years by the City of New York until a lawsuit
finally forced the city to release them. Dr. Griffin's study of these accounts
has led him beyond his earlier questioning of the official story of the
collapses, to his above-quoted conclusion: The destruction of the three
WTC buildings with explosives by US government terrorists is no longer a
hypothesis, but a fact that has been proved beyond a reasonable doubt.
It's important to note that Dr. Griffin is one of many prominent
intellectuals--including the likes of Gore Vidal, Howard Zinn, Peter Dale
Scott, Richard Falk, Paul Craig Roberts, Morgan Reynolds and Peter Phillips--who
have seen through the major discrepancies of the official explanation of
9/11 and have risen to challenge it. These brave individuals represent the
tip of an ever-growing iceberg of discreet 9/11 skeptics. Indeed, 9/11 skepticism
appears to be almost universal among intellectuals who have examined the
evidence, since there has not yet been a single serious attempt to refute
the case developed by Dr. Griffin and such like-minded thinkers as Nafeez
Ahmed and Mike Ruppert. As for the general public, polls have shown that
a strong majority of Canadians (63%, Toronto Star, May '04) and half of
New Yorkers (Zogby, August 2004) agree that top US leaders conspired to
murder nearly 3,000 Americans on 9/11/01.
How, then, can the mainstream US media continue to ignore
the story of the century? Perhaps the best answer was given by Dr. Griffin
himself in the conclusion of his talk, and is worth quoting at length:
"The evidence for this conclusion (that 9/11 was an inside
job) has thus far been largely ignored by the mainstream press, perhaps
under the guise of obeying President Bush's advice not to tolerate "outrageous
conspiracy theories." We have seen, however, that it is the Bush administration's
conspiracy theory that is the outrageous one, because it is violently contradicted
by numerous facts, including some basic laws of physics.
"There is, of course, another reason why the mainstream
press has not pointed out these contradictions. As a recent letter to the
Los Angeles Times said:
"'The number of contradictions in the official version
of . . . 9/11 is so overwhelming that . . . it simply cannot be believed.
Yet . . . the official version cannot be abandoned because the implication
of rejecting it is far too disturbing: that we are subject to a government
conspiracy of 'X-Files' proportions and insidiousness.'
"The implications are indeed disturbing. Many people
who know or at least suspect the truth about 9/11 probably believe that
revealing it would be so disturbing to the American psyche, the American
form of government, and global stability that it is better to pretend to
believe the official version. I would suggest, however, that any merit this
argument may have had earlier has been overcome by more recent events and
realizations. Far more devastating to the American psyche, the American
form of government, and the world as a whole will be the continued rule
of those who brought us 9/11, because the values reflected in that horrendous
event have been reflected in the Bush administration's lies to justify the
attack on Iraq, its disregard for environmental science and the Bill of
Rights, its criminal negligence both before and after Katrina, and now its
apparent plan not only to weaponize space but also to authorize the use
of nuclear weapons in a preemptive strike.
" In light of this situation and the facts discussed
in this lecture---as well as dozens of more problems in the official account
of 9/11 discussed elsewhere---I call on the New York Times to take the lead
in finally exposing to the American people and the world the truth about
9/11. Taking the lead on such a story will, of course, involve enormous
risks. But if there is any news organization with the power, the prestige,
and the credibility to break this story, it is the Times. It performed yeoman
service in getting the 9/11 oral histories released. But now the welfare
of our republic and perhaps even the survival of our civilization depend
on getting the truth about 9/11 exposed. I am calling on the Times to rise
to the occasion.
David Ray Griffin
Dr. Griffin's speech given at the University of Wisconsin
earlier this year, entitled "9/11 and the American Empire," was
broadcast twice on C-SPAN. In late September Dr. Griffin was asked to give
expert testimony at hearings sponsored by Cynthia McKinney and the Congressional
Black Caucus investigating the 9/11 Commission Report. He is currently Professor
Emeritus at Claremont College in California.
This weekend's events were sponsored by NY911truth.org, WBAI
and the Muslim-Christian-Jewish Alliance for 9/11 Truth: http://mujca.com.
Kevin Barrett Coordinator, MUJCA-NET: http://mujca.com
All information posted on this web site is
the opinion of the author and is provided for educational purposes only.
It is not to be construed as medical advice. Only a licensed medical doctor
can legally offer medical advice in the United States. Consult the healer
of your choice for medical care and advice.