[Editor's Note: The 'multi-universe' is based upon the idea that there are simultaneous and multiple levels of existence occupying the same space, but in a slightly different frequency band. Therefore, we can only see, hear, or experience those events that are "vibrating" within our frequency range, but we are unaware  that other "people" are experiencing another reality within their frequency band-but in the same location. If you read the "Seth" books channelled by Jane Roberts, she talks about this 'Unknown Reality' at length. ...Ken].

By David Brandt<migs@zianet.com>
http://educate-yourself.org/db/multiverse04oct07.shtml
October 4, 20078

September 30, 2007

Ken,

The multi verse 'theory' is true, but far too complex to go into detail on. So many stories are based on paradoxical events by time-travel into the past. If there were one timeline 'universe', anyone with the technology to affect events on that timeline would be doing so, creating extreme chaos (something we have in ample supply). This is why I've made brief references to timelines in what I've written.

We have more than enough to deal with on this timeline without concerning ourselves about other ones--and this is the only one we should be concerned with. I have observed this from a point of timelessness, having access to so much knowledge that it makes the internet less then microscopic. And from that point, I labeled my experience here as 'profoundly simple'.

From here, it is extremely complex--most of us have difficulty with the concept of time, as we are viewing it from a finite reference point. At one time it gave me 'headaches' attempting to figure it out (not literally, but intellectually difficult). After my experiential events, I don't even think about it because I have an understanding of it. Explaining it is far more difficult.

It is the way it is because it can be no other way, we would not gain the benefit of experience without accepting this particular limitation. Although I have read that some scientists at Oxford have proven this mathematically, it makes not one bit of difference to me, nor should it to anyone else except as a matter of curiosity. Affecting one particular timeline without 'branching off' into another has been a longtime goal, but one which cannot be realized as there are rules built into 3rd density experience (it is a safeguard). There are far more important aspects of life to focus on-such as our purpose, which is, ultimately, spiritual advancement. This encompasses many aspects of life which don't need an explanation.

David Brandt

***

October 04, 2007

Ken,

Now there's actually debate that the multi verse proves the non-existence of God. If anything, the evidence for this, for the order and design--and from my observation complexity is evidence to the contrary.

Even at the most basic level, simple observation demonstrates that 'chance', etc. is not what is occurring here, but instead purpose.

Purpose is evidence of intelligence, and even the ability to conceive of ideas having to do with time and space is evidence of intelligent design. There are no accidents or coincidences, and the fallacy of using a concept requiring intelligence to arrive at as proof that intelligence doesn't exist is self-defeating.

Although I emphasize that giving these concepts thought as a matter of curiousity is good, it is by no means a priority in our lives--but I am amazed at the circular logic. "I am intelligent enough to ask these questions, but there is no intelligence in the design that gave me this ability" is so contradictory as to be...well, I am a person that was this way for many years until the sheer number and severity of events experienced caused an awakening.

Atheism is a gateway as well, and one usually arrived at from the rejection of religious dogma and issues of idealism. Although I can observe the flaws, I will never attempt to challenge the belief system, which is based on disbelief--as per the law of allowance. Each of us has their path, and I base my views of others on their actions. I have observed attempts at forcing beliefs on others which both religion and organizations such a CSICOP have done. The bottom line is that this is still about experience, and none of us have the answers for others, just our perspective based on our own observations and experience.

David

****

© Copyright 2007 Educate-Yourself.org  All Rights Reserved.