"In Stage III [of disarmament] progressive controlled
disarmament ... would proceed to a point where no
state would have the military power to challenge the
progressively strengthened UN Peace Force and all
international disputes would be settled according to
On his return from Vladivostok , USSR, where he had signed an agreement drafted at the Strategic Arms
Limitation Talks (SALT), President Ford announced in a typically mixed metaphor that he had" put a
cap- on the arms race. In the light of previous deals with the Communists, such a pronouncement was
incredible. It conjured up memories of Chamberlain, newly arrived from Munich, standing on the sacred
ground in which his head was buried and announcing through the sand that the treaty in his hand was
proof we would have" peace in our time.-
While the Liberal press was singing hosannas to SALT II as the pinnacle of détente
agreed principles of international conduct .... The
Peace-keeping capabilities of the United Nations
would be sufficiently strong and the obligations of all
states under such arrangements sufficiently far
reaching as to assure peace and the just settlement of
differences in a disarmed world." -Department of State Publication 7277
By Gary Allen
http://educate-yourself.org/ga/RF8chap1976.shtml
Published 1976
On his return from Vladivostok , USSR, where he had signed an agreement drafted at the Strategic Arms
Limitation Talks (SALT), President Ford announced in a typically mixed metaphor that he had "put a
cap- on the arms race." In the light of previous deals with the Communists, such a pronouncement was
incredible. It conjured up memories of Chamberlain, newly arrived from Munich, standing on the sacred
ground in which his head was buried and announcing through the sand that the treaty in his hand was
proof we would have " peace in our time."
While the Liberal press was singing hosannas to SALT II as the pinnacle of détente (French for both a trigger and a lessening of tensions), the Communists were gobbling up territory faster
than the Oklahoma Sooners. Using Soviet arms, the Reds were sweeping through Cambodia and South
Vietnam. With the planned opening of Suez, they were preparing to link their naval forces in the
Mediterranean and the Indian Ocean. And. Portugal, a long-time American ally, was being converted
into a Soviet outpost in Western Europe. If this is détente, bring back the Cold War.
The road toward SALT began at the dawn of the nuclear age, when Leftist scientists and academics,
standing at the wailing wall of disarmament, began to bemoan their fear that America's superior nuclear
capacity would somehow frighten a worried Soviet Union into launching a major war. The "solution " to
this peril begins with the Pugwash Conferences and might conclude with the forced surrender of a
disarmed US
In 1955,the Parliamentary Association for World Government issued a call for a series of "Conferences
on Science and World Affairs" between Russian and American scientists and intellectuals. The first of
these was held in 1957 at the home of Russophile Cyrus Eaton in Pugwash, Nova Scotia. Eaton, who
began his career a secretary to John D. Rockefeller and is now a business partner of the Rockefellers in
promoting Red trade, earned the Lenin Peace Prize for fronting the deal and financing the first five
Conferences. Since then, more than twenty have been held, most of them outside the United States All
have been financed by the tax-exempt Rockefeller CFR foundations.
On September 23, 1960, three years after the first Pugwash Conference, the Soviets presented a plan for
total and complete disarmament - to the United Nations. It called for a systematic reduction in arms by
major powers of the world. The so-called "Soviet plan" immediately became the beneficiary of
extremely influential American support, when a group of powerful proponents of disarmament within
the CFR endorsed it.
This was no mere happenstance. A secret CFR disarmament program, entitled "Study No.7," was made
public a few months later. Prepared by the CFR for the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, " Study
No.7" argued that the United States " must: (1) search for an international order ... in which many
policies are jointly undertaken by ... states with differing political, economic and social systems, and
including states labeling themselves as 'socialist."' [That is, Communist.] In order to build such a "new
international order,' " the CFR said, we must -maintain and gradually increase the authority of the UN,"
and "conduct serious negotiations to achieve international agreement on limitation, reduction and control
of armaments.-
And here is the amazing part: This CFR position paper had preceded the Soviet proposal of September
23, 1960, by nearly a year. Pugwashed or not, the two schemes were almost identical!
This Pugwash-CFR conspiracy is one of the most brilliant achievements in psychological warfare since
the Trojan Horse. While Americans were being told of the horrors of nuclear war and the supposed
advantages of limiting our defenses, the Russians were arming to the teeth.
lt was in June of 1964 that the Ford Foundation, already famous for bankrolling Rockefeller- approved
fascist socialist causes, put up $325,000 for a Pugwash production called the "Joint US - USSR Study
Group in Disarmament."
The climate which Rockefeller partner Cyrus Eaton's Pugwash group and the CFR had created was by
now well established. Advocates of the New World Order began to crow that World Government was at
last in sight.
In September of 1961, the Department of State released Publication 7277, entitled : Freedom From War:
The United States Program for General and Complete Disarmament in a Peaceful World.
It was a three-stage program which provided:
In Stage III progressive controlled disarmament and continuously developing principles and procedures
of international law would proceed to a point where no state would have the military power to challenge the progressively strengthened UN Peace Force and all international disputes would be settled according to agreed
* Strategy for the Sixties, Jay Cerf and Walter Pozen, New York Praeger, Inc., 1961.p92 THE
ROCKEFELLER FILE
principles of international conduct. . . . The peacekeeping capabilities of the United Nations would be
sufficiently strong and the obligations of all states under such arrangements sufficiently far reaching as
to assure peace and the just settlement of differences in a disarmed world.
The same month that State Department Publication 7277 was issued, the United States Arms Control
and Disarmament Agency was created by Congress. Within forty-eight hours the new Agency presented
its disarmament scheme to the United Nations. Naturally, it was a carbon copy of the CFR-Soviet-
Pugwash proposal presented to the UN by the Communists the year before While the newspapers and
TV have prattled endlessly about disarmament, nary a word has been said about the other side of the
coin: all such proposals call for arming the United Nations! This apparently is the best-kept secret since
the formula for Coca-Cola.
In October of 1968 the US Disarmament Agency issued a revised proposal, entitled : Arms Control and
National Security, which declared:
Since 1959, the agreed ultimate goal of the negotiations has been general and complete disarmament,
i.e., the total elimination of all armed forces and armaments except those needed to maintain internal
order within states and to furnish the United Nations with peace forces. . . . While the reductions were
taking place, a UN peace force would be established and developed, and, by the time the plan was
completed, it would be so strong that no nation could challenge it.
Notice that the document said," Since1959" The US Arms Control and Disarmament Agency was no
established until September 1961. But it was in 1959 that the CFR " Study No.7 " was prepared and its
content were transmitted to the Soviets.
How successful have these New World Order disarmers been in implementing their plans? What has
happened to our military strength since disarmament was accepted as official US Government policy?
The first Secretary of Defense to implement this policy was CFR member Robert 5. McNamara,
Secretary of Defense from 1961 through 1968. In The Betrayers, Phyllis Schlafly and Chester Ward
discuss McNamara's wrecking job. Where Robert McNamara left office, they note, he had:
... reduced our nuclear striking force by 50% while the Soviets had increased theirs by 300%.
... caused the US to lose its lead in nuclear delivery vehicles.
... scrapped 3/4 of our multi megaton missiles.
... cut back the originally planned 2,000 Minutemen to 1,000.
... destroyed all our intermediate and medium-range missiles.
... canceled our 24-megaton bomb.
... scrapped 1,455 of 2,710 bombers left over from the Eisenhower Administration.
... disarmed 600 of the remaining bombers of their strategic nuclear weapons.
... frozen the number of Polaris subs at 41, refusing to build any more missile-firing submarines.
... refused to allow development of any new weapons systems except the TFX (F-111).
... canceled Skybolt, Pluto, Dynasoar and Orian [missile systems].
In fact, McNamara destroyed more operational US strategic weapons that the Soviets could have
destroyed in a full-scale nuclear attack!
Supporting McNamara's efforts at unilateral disarmament were CFR members John J. McCloy and
Willian C. Foster. McCloy, who preceded David Rockefeller a chairman of the board of both the CFR
and the family' piggy bank, Chase Manhattan, was picked by President John F. Kennedy to be chairman
of the General Advisor, Committee for the Arms Control and Disarmament Agency, a post which he
still holds. William C. Foster was appointed director of the Agency. In 1969, Foster was replaced as
director by Gerard C. Smith, another CFR member. Smith's successor in 1973 was Fred Ikle who (this
will probably not surprise you) is also a member of the Council on Foreign Relations.
John J. McCloy's current General Advisory Committee is composed of 1. W. Abel, Dr. Harold Brown
(CFR), William C. Foster (CFR), Kermit Cordon (CFR), Dr. James R. Killian, General Lauris Norstad
(CFR), Dr. Jack Ruina (CFR), Dean Rusk (CFR), William Scranton, Dr. John Archibald Wheeler, and,
Judith A. Cole, staff director.
What is going on here, alas, is all too simple. The Rockefeller - Establishment Insiders of the Council on
Foreign Relations are working to weaken America's defensive capacity so the Soviets can "catch up."
This policy, they believe, will lead eventually to a merger of political and economic interests- what the
CFR calls a New World Order.
This is not academic skylarking. It is, as we have seen, official US policy. The operative phases of this
scheme began in earnest when CFR Insiders persuaded President Lyndon Johnson to propose the
Strategic Arms Limitation Talks (SALT) in 1966. The SALT talks to negotiate a first disarmament
treaty were scheduled for July 1968. They were postponed until November 1969 because the Soviets
were busy with their invasion of Czechoslovakia-only two weeks after Soviet officials signed the
Declaration of Bratislava, guaranteeing Czech independence!
We have made such great progress at SALT that when the first meetings were scheduled in 1968, the
Soviets had only 850 long-range missiles while the US had 1,054. But following the seventh SALT
meeting, when President Nixon signed accords in Moscow on May 26, 1972, the Soviets had 1,618
ICBMs either deployed or under construction while we, in turn, still had 1,054 - the same number as in
1968. This, in short, is the way we have negotiated. We have frozen production and exported US
technology to permit the Kremlin first to catch up, and then to surpass us.
What trends must we stop to prevent an ultimatum from the Soviets? To begin with, there is the effort to
limit defense spending- especially in the area of strategic weapons development.
In the 1974 Economic Report of the President we learn that in 1953 our total government spending as a
%age of national income was 33.2 %. That included 16 % for domestic spending, including welfare, etc.
Twenty years later, in 1973, government spending had risen to 38.6 % of the national income. During
this time the - better Red than deadboys hid cut defense back to 7 % of the national income while
increasing domestic spending to 31.6 %. You might tap dance through those statistical tulips again.
They confirm that the CFR plan is fully operative-that we are being prepared for the New World Order
by being collectivized and disarmed at the same time.
Nor do those figures tell the whole story. With the advent of our -professional- Armed Forces, fifty-six
% of the defense budget is now going for salaries. Congressman Larry McDonald (D.-Ca.) of the House
Armed Services Committee observes:
The Liberals in Congress are constantly calling for the slashing of the -bloated- Defense budget so they
can further increase Welfare spending. Since we cannot cut salaries, about the only thing which can be
cut is hardware. Trimming the so-called fat actually turns out to be slicing out bone and muscle. If we
had a war, we would have lots of men in uniform, but they wouldn't have adequate equipment with
which to fight.
This result is a tribute to the skullduggery and conspiracy of the Insiders of the Rockefeller Council on
Foreign Relations who planned it that way. Our -military industrial complex- had to be destroyed to
make Soviet superiority - more plausible. It has, as a result, been literally starved to death on purpose.
Of course all of this was anticipated when President Nixon signed the SALT I agreement in Moscow
back in May of 1972. Even the very -Liberal- Senator Henry Jackson (D.Wash.) admitted: -Simply put,
the agreement gives the Soviets more of everything: more light ICBMs, more heavy ICBMs, more
submarine-launched missiles, more submarines, more payload, even more ABM radars.
In no area covered in the agreement is the United States permitted to maintain parity with the Soviet
Union.-
It is all too obvious that SALT has not limited the Soviets in any way. The US is being disarmed while
the Communists are being given a first-strike Ultimatum Force.*
* The fact that SALT is merely an extension of the 7277 Disarmament Plan was acknowledged in this
agreement which stated: The USA and the USSR regard as the ultimate objective of their efforts the
achievement of general and complete disarmament and the establishment of an effective system of
international security in accordance with the purposes and principles of the United Nations.
Remember the steel rolling plants we sold the Soviets on credit? Remember the aluminium factories the
Rockefeller-Eaton Axis is building in Eastern Europe? And remember the Kama River truck factory,
financed by David Rockefeller's Chase Manhattan Bank, which will be the largest in the world, covering
some forty square miles? Truck factories, of course, are where tanks are built.
Now, ask yourself this question: If the Soviets are really sincere about détente and peaceful coexistence,
why are they arming at such breakneck speed? Why aren't they diverting that spending into desperately
needed consumer goods? And why is Henry Kissinger letting them get away with it? The answer is that
the Comrades are preparing to deliver the New World Order ultimatum in case Americans refuse to lay
down and play dead. In other words, the traps have been set for world government by consent and by
conquest.
The Communists are working hand-in-hand with our Establishment Insiders. When the former are
powerful enough, the latter will insist we must scrap our national sovereignty and merge into a New
World Order-our survival will require it!
If we have not the will to resist-to fight for national sovereignty-then we have no deterrent at all. We
invite the nuclear ultimatum. And we are, indeed, in grave danger. The last SALT agreement arranged
for a -working meeting- between President Ford and Soviet Party Leader Leonid Brezhnev in
Vladivostok, November 23 and 24, 1974, after the President had visited Japan and South Korea to make"assurances." As usual, the trusted Dr. Kissinger arrived early to " work out the details." The President
dutifully signed what was put in front of him.
The details, as it turned out, limit the US and Soviets to 2,400 land and sea-based missiles and longrange
bombers through 1985. The United States, we are told in Newsweek for December 9, 1974, has
some 2,206 intercontinental missiles (ICBMs), submarine-based missiles (SLBMs), and long-range
bombers. The Soviets, we are assured, have deployed 2,375 such missiles and bombers. In addition, we
agreed to equip only 1,320 missiles with MIRV warheads.
After dispatching Henry Kissinger to Peking to brief the Red Chinese, President Ford returned home to
present his version of the summit to twenty-six Congressional leaders. Back in Washington the President
crowed: " We put a firm ceiling on the strategic-arms race. What we have done," he stated with a
straight face," is to set firm and equal limits on the strategic forces of each side, thus preventing an arms
race ... Vladivostok is a breakthrough for peace ... future generations will thank us.-
The National Observer for December 14, 1974, expressed amazement: " With such fanciful descriptions
Mr. Ford, he of the plain word and honest face, is beguiling us-or has been beguiled and is merely
repeating the phrases the beguilers used on him.-
The prestigious Aviation Week & Space Technology for December 9, 1974, warned: " The Vladivostok
agreement puts a cap on nothing. The new SALT buzzword about 'putting a cap on the arms race' is just
some more White House press agentry that would be ludicrous if it had not proved so disastrous to the
Nixon Administration and US interests at past summits."
So there you have it. Rockefeller Contingency Plan II - be used in the event that the American people
cannot be persuaded to accept the surrender of US sovereignty to their New World Order-will be the
blunt ultimatum: let the UN run the whole show, or those nasty Communist will blast us all to bits.
Step One was a massive media campaign, brainwashing the public into abject horror at the thought of
nuclear war
Step Two was to increase Soviet military muscle (more on this in the next chapter), to lend some
credence to Soviet claims of nuclear power.
Step Three was to make certain the US Armed Force were not permitted to advance technologically. The
development of new weapons systems was forbidden; existing armaments were allowed to rust.
Step Four was to win Congressional approval for the Soviet-CFR planned disarmament scheme. What
was approved wasn't disarmament at all; it was a proposal to arm a World Government police force by
taking weapon from the US and giving them to the UN.
Steps One through Three have already been implemented. And even while you are reading this Insiders
in New York, Washington, Geneva, and London are working to convert Step Four from a plan to a fact '
As the CFR's James Warburg declared to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee twenty-five years
ago:" We will have world government whether or not you like it-by conquest or consent." Warburg and
his fellow conspirators have made certain that whichever deck is used to deal the next hands, the cards
have already been stacked against us.
All information posted on this web site is
the opinion of the author and is provided for educational purposes only.
It is not to be construed as medical advice. Only a licensed medical doctor
can legally offer medical advice in the United States. Consult the healer
of your choice for medical care and advice.