[Editor's Note: This was sent to me by a friend of mine, but I debated whether I should post it or not. After thinking about it, though, I thought it was a good opportunity to rant about doom & gloom artists and the products of their labor. This info was taken from God-like Productions (GLP). I think it's operated by Ken (or Kent) Steadman if memory serves me correctly. I stopped reading the alarmist garbage posted there a few years ago. It's one continuous stream of anxiety provoking, 'The Sky is Falling' postings from self described militia men, patriots, government insiders, etc. who are anxious to deliver an eleventh hour tip-off of impending doom which almost ALWAYS includes dire warnings of being mere days or even hours away from having coast to coast martial law declared due to some major catastrophe, or infiltration of foreign troops, or nukes going off in our major cities (as in this posting), etc., etc. It's a covert psyops in my opinion. The idea is to keep you anxious, worried, and stressed out. That's the goal of every government sponsored psyops: fear, anxiety, stress and despair.

One rule of thumb you can always count on with a covert disinformation setup is an inability to identify a flesh and blood individual behind the postings.You will get a pseudonym and you may even get a genuine e-mail address that will respond to your inquiry (not very often), but you will never get an individual to stand up in a public forum and identify himself as the author of one of these dire, eleventh hour warnings--NEVER. This is a CONSTANT with covert disinformation operations. Unfortunately, you can't talk to our Paul Revere in person or over the phone, and you can almost never contact him by e-mail. Therefore you can't question him and force him to justify his "inside" information (how convenient). Yet, tens of thousands of people will read something by a skilled disinformationist and buy into it because it sounds convincing. Alarmed readers are led to believe that they are getting the genuine scoop from an insider who knows the Real Deal, but the anonymous warning from "J" or "PR" will quickly evaporate into the ether when his dire predictions don't pan out; only to be replaced by a new anonymous poster, "K", with a new doom & gloom scenario, posted the very next day.

Every word in these postings came out of Langley or some military psyops group in my opinion. Its phoniness is palpable and I'm no psychic! The content of the words alone tell me that it's pure BS, but that's not to say that the traitors won't run some sort of engineered 'terrorist' disaster this month, because I've been told by a few people that something could happen this month, but it certainly won't be a nuke going off in a major city because friendly aliens won't allow that to happen.

You need to remember that the traitors are following a carefully written script to, step by step, destroy our Constitution and install a fascist, police state where there was once liberty, freedom, and a respect for privacy. They need the US population in a highly stressed state of near-panic in order to install their scripted scenarios. They achieve that by bombarding us with television shows, movies, "news" broadcasts of the 'Islamic terrorist threat', bird-flu hysteria, microwave towers, doom & gloom barkers, and web sites which cause us to become emotional, agitated, stressed, and anxious. You can't think clearly when you're anxious and jittery and that's exactly the way that want you- in a reactive, survival mode.

While I'm on a roll, I might as well remind you that there's another category of doom & gloom forecaster, like Steve Quayle, who work above ground and love to get into your face, but the objectives are the same as covert disinformationists - fear and anxiety. I love it when Steve Quayle loudly denies on George Noory's radio show that he's a doom & gloomer (as many people have rightly accused him) when every sentence out of his mouth is a prediction of doom & gloom. What a fear mongering phony! He's another 'Christian' fundamentalist servant to the British Israel 'Kingdom of God on Earth' deception. My advice? Hold a steady couse and don't allow yourself to be influenced by fear promoters. The Dark Side is losing-and they know it. .Ken Adachi]

http://educate-yourself.org/lte/gloominjune18jun06.shtml
June 18, 2006

Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2006
From: John
To: Editor <E-mail>
Subject: possible warning

Composite of the posts of "K" in this thread (all timestamps are EDT):

Subject: I must warn the American people that their lives are in grave danger
===============================
K
User ID: 107046
6/17/2006 7:51:00 PM

You have no doubt heard rumors that posit a "live event" between June 19 and June 24. These rumors should not be dismissed as wild conspiracy theories.
===============================
K
User ID: 107046
6/17/2006 8:01:00 PM

You must understand that there are no clear lines of accountability here; that at every juncture along the way each "change agent" has his or her own take on plausible deniability. That's been built into the system for a long time. I know, because I helped to put these things in place.
===============================
K
User ID: 107046
6/17/2006 8:07:00 PM

Something that amuses me about younger people today who are enamoured beyond all reason with the communicative advantages of the internet, believing that such discussions are unique to their own time in history, is that they fail to understand that almost everything has been covered before in endless backroom discussions as early as the Kennedy administration. You can say that back then we had a more fluid internet, although somewhat constrained by technological limitations of paper and print.
===============================
K
User ID: 107046
6/17/2006 8:15:00 PM

If I were a normal citizen of the United States (and I cannot take up enough space to extemporize on the very peculiar meaning of the adjective "normal" as it applies to me, although many of you are familiar with my face, perhaps glimpsed occasionally on television) I would suggest you contact the FBI. However, for reasons that are too complex to analyze here, the FBI will not help you. On the contrary, you would only make of yourself a moving target and a subject of critical, extraordinary importance.
===============================
K
User ID: 107046
6/17/2006 8:27:00 PM

I think I would have a very hard job telling you why these events, should they transpire as planned (and I have no reason to doubt their integrity of intentions), are partially designed to make your lives less uncomfortable over the course of ensuing years. The motive is informed not only by concerns of governmental and economic self-preservation at the higher levels of the power structure, it is also driven by the imperative of a corollary benefit: that of assisting the American people "as a whole" throughout a phase of extraordinarily difficult transition. However, in the short term, starting from the middle of next week, there will be an enormous loss of life; and everyone will be pointing fingers once citizens have recovered from the initial shock. I think you should be aware of this before examining or disseminating unqualified conspiracy theories.
===============================
K
User ID: 107046
6/17/2006 8:44:00 PM

I travel very frequently (although these days in an almost wholly private capacity) and I reside both within and without the borders of the United States. Whenever I have the time, I make an effort to read analyses published to the Internet in various fora and publications, and while the quality is comparable to that of the print media (in many cases much better), there is till very little I have not heard before.

Many years before most of you were born, I was asked my opinion on Operation Mongoose. I told my enquirer that I considered it a very foolhardy enterprise that would do little to foster America's security and economic well-being. This particular gentleman was not at all happy with my reply, so he waited two days and phoned me close to midnight. "Tell me again," he said, "you have a favorable opinion of the operation and are sure of it success, aren't you?"

"No," I told him, "I don't have a favorable opinion. But I know that it's very important for you to believe that I have a favorable opinion. Therefore, if it helps, then let me assure you that you are at liberty to believe anything you want."

I find myself in a very similar situation today. I have been asked the same kind of questions in regard to what has been planned to take place next week. History repeats itself; only the faces change.
===============================
K
User ID: 107046
6/17/2006 8:56:00 PM

As far as my relationship to the current administration is concerned, I am naturally loyal, for I served successive administrations for a number of years and possess enormous respect for the men and women who dedicate their lives to civic government. But I am an old man and have a fairly wide reach in terms of understanding processes not fully perceived by those I (perhaps wrongly or misguidedly) see as my juniors, at least insofar as their experience in foreign affairs is concerned. I did not support the invasion of Iraq, which I still believe to have been a colossal strategic mistake, and I have further advised the administration to deal diplomatically with Iran, yet I have remained circumspect in my public utterances.
===============================
K
User ID: 107046
6/17/2006 9:12:00 PM

It is their intention to detonate an undisclosed number of relatively small nuclear devices, such atrocities confined not just to NYC and Washington DC, but also "delivered" in at least three blue-collar conurbations, with Detroit and Houston heading the list. Los Angeles and Chicago may be hit by a series of conventional explosions, similar to those which destroyed the Alfred P. Murrah building in Oklahoma City. I suspect there is much more planned, for I can no longer assume that this administration is being entirely honest in its dealings with former federal employees.

I have no information as to material specifications. I have been assured that I am safe in my current location, which is not in the United States. Yet I am unhappy about the way in which I was informed, the timing of the warning and the impact this has had on my family and a number of my colleagues.
===============================
K
User ID: 107046
6/17/2006 9:27:00 PM

In answer to your question, the issue is not really Iran at all. The issue is focused on the fundamental weaknesses of the economy of the United States, and the growing non-partisan rift between those who are happy to lose completely our manufacturing base and those who insist we should at least make an effort to rebuild our manufacturing capacity in light of future projections.

It is not simply a question of economics. Recent years have seen Pentagon acquisition personnel camp out overnight in the Treasury Department because they insisted on having certain products manufactured in the United States instead of China or India. To some extent, we have exported our national security to countries which do not share our international objectives. Afghanistan, Iraq and Iran are, of course, part of the wider picture. But it was in the course of overseas deployments and battlefield exigencies that a huge number of unforeseen vulnerabilities became apparent, and Mr Rumsfeld was unable to meet these unexpected requirements. If it had not been for the Israelis working at short notice around the clock, American troops in Iraq would be firing blanks.
===============================
K
User ID: 107046
6/17/2006 9:33:00 PM

Yes, the entire rationale behind the attacks is to acquire rapid and overwhelming support for policies upon which the administration would default on the national debt and the budget deficit. Martial law would have to be invoked as an initial response to the sort of anarchy witnessed in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, but it is not envisaged as a long-term solution to disorder, if only because Americans tend to do best when they give their consent to federal planners.
===============================
K
User ID: 107046
6/17/2006 9:47:00 PM

The nature of the discussion which has dominated Pentagon and Treasury thinking these past two years revolves around one central question:

Is the security of the United States best served on a global basis, not only in terms of our military spread, but also in terms of diversifying and internationalizing our military-industrial base, or on the basis of a repatriated manufacturing capability?

The big problem for us lies in our ability to placate potential adversaries by giving them a big enough piece of the cake, which in turn serves our dollar policy best. China, for instance, although smartly disadvantaged in our eastward push, is paradoxically committed to providing some of the tools our military men need to accomplish their objectives. China knows that her short to medium-term profit is mitigated by the inevitability of less influence in Asia.

We are playing a very dangerous poker game and nobody can afford to blink.
===============================
K
User ID: 107046
6/17/2006 10:08:00 PM

Let me further emphasize the extent to which we have endangered our long-term national security by exporting manufacturing and corporate management deals, while at the same time stressing my general support for the process known as globalization.

The invasion of Iraq would scarcely have been possible without the logistical and financial support of Kuwait, Saudi Arabia and the UAE. I was not among those outraged by the "Dubai Ports Acquisition" deal, because the authority in question was shorn of all geo-political considerations. It simply represented payback for services rendered, and in perpetuity.

It was the way in which this deal was handled (mostly in secrecy) that led to widespread discontent. Furthermore, few congressmen and senators have been provided with a comprehensive overview of the new economic-security duopoly, their retaining somewhat fanciful notions of a domestic manufacturing capability that no longer exists.

If the dollar is to prolong its primacy in international trading markets, we need to ensure that non-nationals are engaged in manufacturing activities animated by our defense procurement budget. Please don't forget that we allocate more funding to defense than all other nations of the world together. It represents our single greatest industrial, scientific and intellectual enterprise.
===============================
K
User ID: 107046
6/17/2006 10:24:00 PM

Woodrow Wilson did indeed warn of such forces, yet I see them in more prosaic terms than he, and none more clearly than in the conflict between both groups right across the board within our own government. Had Donald Rumsfeld been relieved of his duties, this would have represented an enormous victory for the Pentagon planners campaigning for a return to a domestic manufacturing base.

However, President Bush is not of the same view, believing that America's interests lie beyond what most of us had accepted as rational globalization. Should, for instance, America's heartland be destroyed in a nuclear exchange that [by some chance] did not solicit an immediate, retaliatory response, the United States military, not wholly dependent on US continental manufacturing and re-tooling, could inarguably survive to fight another day, or at least defend offshore US facilities and seats of government.

E Pluribus Unum: Is the continental landmass of the United States an important factor in the continued hegemony of the United States government, or can it be sacrificed, albeit partially, for the "greater good"?
===============================
K
User ID: 107046
6/17/2006 10:47:00 PM

This is the crux of the matter: Should the United States as a nation state dissolve itself into the body politic of the global leviathan in order to ensure its international reach, or should the United States retreat to a position similar to that seen prior to the Nixon administration?

The current administration, laudable in many respects, has perhaps pushed the envelope too far, too quickly and in a way that was only possible in a military flight-forward on the grand chessboard of south west, central and south Asia. The catastrophe in Iraq has delayed what many observers once believed would be the swift march of democracy and new markets throughout the Middle East and Asia. Effecting regime change in Iran by means of military intervention is therefore unconscionable, leading as it would to a widening of the conflict beyond the Muslim world to engulf the greater part of the global polity in a protracted war or series of hot wars. Inevitably, such a conflict would see the use of nuclear weaponry, laying waste to resources vital to the economic viability of all developed and developing nations.

However, the United States is faced with an economic challenge it cannot hope to resolve without taking extraordinary measures. The choice is this: Do we downgrade the economic viability of the continental landmass of the United States (spoiling the pack) in a bid to escape creditor liabilities, or do we accept such obligations (forced upon us by a weakening dollar) and repatriate our manufacturing capabilities, simultaneously losing our global military hegemony?
===============================
K
User ID: 107046
6/17/2006 11:03:00 PM

The attacks planned for next week are in keeping with the imperative of those who argue for spoiling the pack to a minimal extent, allowing for massive credit defaults, while still pressing for the expansion of some kind of institutional presence in Syria, Iran and beyond. Furthermore, rather than play the "wounded dog" card alone, the United States would aggressively play the "mad dog" card, making it explicitly clear to all global players that any action on the part of the SEA, EU and Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei economies to wholly or partially abandon the dollar in international trades would have military implications. By that I mean the implicit and very real, deliverable threat of a nuclear strike against any nation or trading bloc that sought to conduct business injurious to the dollar or the economic well-being of American interests at home or abroad.
===============================
K
User ID: 107046
6/17/2006 11:16:00 PM

I am currently slightly out of favor with the administration, yet they continue to defer to my advice on account of my experience, knowledge and very advanced years. I have, however, been given no indication as to the yields they intend to deploy. I can only say that their intention is to obtain levels of structural damage and human losses that provide the desired outcome in terms of universally accepted defaults on trillions of dollars of debt and deficits, and the submission of the American people to a vastly reordered society.

I don't agree with this strategy, but I must concede that it possesses its own logic. It's an inelegant solution, but a solution nonetheless.
===============================
K
User ID: 107046
6/17/2006 11:19:00 PM

I am responding to your questions. Please read what I have said.
===============================
K
User ID: 107046
6/17/2006 11:33:00 PM

As stated before, I have no information in respect of yields to be deployed. I only know that you will see a mix of nuclear and conventional explosives used to cause optimal damage to America's economic infrastructure, such damage being sufficient to elicit a tidal wave of international sympathy and support.

At first you will see a near stand-down in military operations abroad where circumstances permit. This may or may not be the case in Iraq (depending upon the success of a truce negotiated on the basis of false promises made to Iraqi insurgents) and the issue of Iran will fall of the radar, not intensify as some would wish. The strategy is to win as much international support for defaults in the initial stages of the calamity, whereafter the iron fist is unsheathed from its velvet glove, catching a shocked and terrified world by surprise.

We are talking about the survival of the United States. It's not a game.
===============================
K
User ID: 107046
6/17/2006 11:55:00 PM

If I were to tender any advice, it would sound wistful and wholly inadequate given the circumstances. I do not wish to see fellow Americans harmed in any way and I can therefore only ask you to take care and avoid major intersections, airports, financial districts, commercial centers, power hubs, government buildings and anything else considered vital to the day-to-day running of the federal government and the American economy.

Thousands of government employees will conveniently find themselves in emergency accommodation next week, and it is from those sites that martial law will be introduced and coordinated. If you are lucky enough to be one such employee, then you need not worry about your personal welfare.
===============================
K
User ID: 107046
6/18/2006 12:17:00 AM

Yes, the scenario would enable a tactical withdrawal from Iraq "with honor" should negotiations with Iraqi insurgents be successful. However, the larger bases would remain, with policing and anti-guerilla activities undertaken by the Iraqi army. As I said, the face of America will change soon after she has won international agreement on defaults.

© Copyright 2006 Educate-Yourself.org  All Rights Reserved.