http://educate-yourself.org/lte/incorporatedreligion02oct06.shtml
October 2, 2006

Subject: incorporated religion
From: cobaltdan@gmail.com
Date: Mon, October 2, 2006 5:13 pm
To: Editor

I've noticed that while a lot of your articles are very interesting, a lot of the facts presented are extremely questionable. On that note, I always see talk
of religion and saving the covenant and making everything right after w/e new age religion is brought in...this kind of talk should not be allowed - one simple reason: there are probably tones of people who will visit your site, see that, and think this is some place where people can vent their religious beliefs...it defeats the purpose of this site.

So getting facts 100% right and keeping religion out of this would be great:)

For one example - Project Blue Beam is full of flaws - it even claims that the Soviets are the NWO...that doesn't even make sense because it's been talking about NASA...and it was George. H. W. Bush who coined the phrased NWO any way...i'm just saying, maybe read what goes up on the site before you put it up...?

Keep the fight for TRUTH alive.

***

Hello "Cobalt Dan"

When you address me in a letter, do me the courtesy of identifying yourself with your name (you know, that appellation given to you at birth). Sending me your vague and unsupported argument that a "lot of facts are extremely questionable" doesn't cut it--if you want to be taken seriously, that is.

If you're going to play critic, then establish the SPECIFICS of your criticism and follow with supporting evidence to PROVE your supposition. So far, you've failed miserably in both regards.

As it is, you have MISCHARACTERISED me and my web site with the following error-filled statements:

1. "I always see talk of religion and saving the covenant and making everything right after w/e new age religion is brought in"

Huh? What EXACTLY are you talking about here? "Saving the covenant"? "Making everything right ..after new age religion brought in" ?

Are you hearing voices in your head? I've never written anything along those lines at my web site-ever.

2. "On that note, ...this kind of talk should not be allowed"

Oh, really? Is that one of your more polished pearls of wisdom?

3. "there are probably tones of people who will visit your site, see that, and think this is some place where people can vent their religious beliefs...it defeats the purpose of this site."

A) I'm going to assume that you meant "tons" and not "tones"

B) It's perfectly OK for people to send me their thoughts about their religious belief or spiritual views. Civilized dialog is what leads one towards greater understanding and tolerance of others. It's something to be encouraged, not denied.

C) The purpose of this web site is solely and exclusively decided by the author, owner, and editor of this web site. You play no role in determining or evaluating what that purpose may be.

4. "So getting facts 100% right and keeping religion out of this would be great:)"

Reread my opening remarks: state your case with specifics. What facts are you disputing? What evidence do you offer to support your version of the "facts"?

B) You are free to start your OWN web site and put up anything that you think will fit your view of reality. As long as I own THIS one, I'll decide what goes up and what doesn't go up.

5. "For one example - Project Blue Beam is full of flaws - it even claims that the Soviets are the NWO...that doesn't even make sense because it's been talking about NASA...and it was George. H. W. Bush who coined the phrased NWO any way...i'm just saying, maybe read what goes up on the site before you put it up...?"

The article about Project Blue Beam was written by two Canadian men who PAID WITH THEIR LIVES for the information that is contained in that article. It is today, freely available on the internet for anyone to read, including vacuous blowhards who wish to denigrate its qualitative value and importance by characterizing it as "full of flaws".

For your information, George Herbert Walker Bush did not coin the phrase "New World Order". He employed it in a speech or two, he did not invent it. It was placed on the U.S. One dollar bill during the 1930's by FDR and even used by Hitler in the 1930's when speaking of the Fourth Reich.

Perhaps you should consider taking your own advice and REREAD what you've written 15 or 20 times BEFORE sending it out.

It might save you some embarrassment.

Sincerely, Ken

© Copyright 2006 Educate-Yourself.org  All Rights Reserved.