http://educate-yourself.org/lte/matthewclaptrap23jun04.shtml
June 23, 2004
Subject: Matthew- claptrap.
From: "Little Buddha" <littlebuddha@blueyonder.co.uk>
Date: Wed, June 23, 2004 2:59 pm
To: Editor@educate-yourself.org
I have the highest regard for your website, but was incensed at the 18th
June 2004 article 'Message from Matthew' How could you post this material
on your site when it is obvious to anyone with an ounce of common sense not
to detect that the articles and Matthewbooks website is a money scam.
It borrows ideas from 2012, E.T. Ascension etc all of which cannot be substantiated
yet is all over the internet in the last few years. Jose Argulle's is making
good money by exploiting people's imagination and stupidity as is Gordon Michael
Scallion with their over priced merchandise, just to give you an idea of these
frauds perpetuated in the name of Ascension, Earth Changes and the coming
of 2012 and the end or beginning of 'A New Cycle' blah blah blah...
Remember the fuss made about Y2K? and what happened- Zero!
I am not ignorant to what is happening in the world and that there are real
challenges ahead of us all, but it is certainly not about Ascension and the
changes of Light bodies, all this is just a diversion. Has anyone come forward
with any proof that their DNA has changed and become what they are claiming?
The answer is NO.
I have emailed Matthewbooks and gave them a decent telling off as they deserve,
how can anyone exploit a dead son in the name of Ascension? What utter clap
trap.
If you continue to post that type of material then I can only conclude that
you are either misguided or capable of leading the blind into ditches.
Regards, no nonsense bullshit.
Lionel Dass.
Subject: Re: Matthew- claptrap.
From: editor@educate-yourself.org
Date: Wed, June 23, 2004 3:42 pm
To: "Little Buddha" <littlebuddha@blueyonder.co.uk>
Hello Lionel,
Bravo, bravo.
Of course, there's no point in challenging such seamless logic. You've nailed
this one down tighter than a drum. Congradulations.
I capitulate totally to your superior position.
Why couldn't I see it all before? I've been such a fool.
I'll be forever in your debt.
Warm Regards, Ken
Subject: More Fraud.
From: "Little Buddha" <littlebuddha@blueyonder.co.uk>
Date: Wed, June 23, 2004 3:33 pm
To: Editor@educate-yourself.org
Ken please be careful about the info that ZS Livingstone is sending you,
I suspect that you are been mislead. The Order of Melchizedek is elitist and
secretive, the people behind The Urantia Book is another fraud and guess who's
name keeps cropping up in TUB- Yes The Order of Melchizedek.
All this stuff about Slyph's gives me cause for concern, It reminds me of
the claims made regarding Lenticular clouds that UFO's hid inside of them,
well we know that is not the truth of the matter and was just someone's idea
to capture the imagination of the New Agers/ UFO idiots to buy into the idea
and the Books. See what I mean.
Be careful about these jokers, I am an honest man who is only interested
in the truth, I have had rude emails from Val Valerian- Leading Edge website
- An elitist site, Acharya S as well just because they refuse to answer simple
questions and have a hidden agenda of their own, amongst others that I could
tell you about.
I still have the emails if you want proof that these incidents have occurred.
Anyway I took the time to let you know and there is no malice on my part towards
these individuals. As far as I am concerned if the sheep want to be led let
them.
You wouldn't believe how stupid the average Brit is here in the U.K. They
believe that Al- Qaiuda did 911. And they believe the war on terrorism is
real and not fabricated. All those years of been bombed by the IRA and they
still don't get the picture. Are these people ready for Ascension? I don't
think so even if they knew what it is or how it may come about.
Personally there is so much hogwash been published that very few can discern
what is truthful and what is not. I have been fooled myself in the past but
have become much better at sniffing out a fraud.
Regards, Lionel Dass.
Subject: Re: More Fraud.
From: editor@educate-yourself.org
Date: Wed, June 23, 2004 3:50 pm
To: "Little Buddha" <littlebuddha@blueyonder.co.uk>
Hello Lionel,
Thanks again. I appreciate your point of view.
Sincerely, Ken
Subject: Fw: Matthew- claptrap.
From: "Little Buddha" <littlebuddha@blueyonder.co.uk>
Date: Wed, June 23, 2004 4:12 pm
To: editor@educate-yourself.org
Hello Ken,
Thank you for your reply, I am not sure how to take your reply as it comes
across as facetious. Can you please explain what you mean or imply? If you
can't be troubled to give a decent explanation why reply? And if you agree
with what I commented about why post the item?
Regards, Lionel.
Subject: Re: Fw: Matthew- claptrap.
From: editor@educate-yourself.org
Date: Wed, June 23, 2004 4:20 pm
To: "Little Buddha" <littlebuddha@blueyonder.co.uk>
Hi Lionel,
I appreciate your point of view even if I don't agree with it.
Lighten up and have some fun. Life is too short to take it so seriously.
Sincerely, Ken
Subject: Fw: Fw: Matthew- claptrap.
From: "Little Buddha" <littlebuddha@blueyonder.co.uk>
Date: Wed, June 23, 2004 4:42 pm
To: editor@educate-yourself.org
Hi Ken,
If you are running a responsible website, how are you able to allow this
material to be posted. Please don't patronise me with the usage of the term
'lightening up' I take it that you are quite happy to put articles onto your
website and couldn't care less about the affect that it could have especially
bad channelled work. Oh I forgot only those stateside have all the answers
and feel arrogant enough to patronise those who seek a simple response. I
should have known and to think all these years I have been recommending others
here in the U.K. to pay your site a visit.
Well I guess you have just put paid to that idea. If you can't answer my
emails without your patronising attitude then why bother?
Subject: Re: Fw: Fw: Matthew- claptrap.
From: editor@educate-yourself.org
Date: Wed, June 23, 2004 5:09 pm
To: "Little Buddha" <littlebuddha@blueyonder.co.uk>
Hello Lionel,
Whether you read my site or recommend it is up to you. The info is free for
all. Take it or leave it. It's your choice.
I respond to you because your arrogance and self assured opinions make it
an awfully tempting opportunity to have some fun. If you choose to take it
with rancor and bruised feelings, so be it. That's your deal, not mine. It's
still your choice.
Siaonara, Ken
Subject: Fw: Fw: Fw: Matthew- claptrap.
From: "Little Buddha" <littlebuddha@blueyonder.co.uk>
Date: Wed, June 23, 2004 5:37 pm
To: editor@educate-yourself.org
Hi Ken, thank you for responding to my arrogant and self assurred opinions,
I wonder who is arrogant and self assured here, seeing as how you decided
to have some fun with me, when I was only trying to point out some concerns
about the article.
You have not even bothered to answer my original query, why not I wonder?
It seems that you may have misunderstood my intentions and yes I am self
assured, you have to be in this dirty little business when it comes to outing
sites which are nothing but fronts for editors egos and brown nosers. I will
do a little more digging as you now have taken the bait and I know what your
game is. One thing that exposes you and others like you is that you cannot
discern a genuine person. That is because you are either a fool or a liar.
If you intend to come back, why don't you try and type more than a few lines
or is that beyond your capacity. Remember you started this crap.
Siaonara
Subject: Re: Fw: Fw: Fw: Matthew- claptrap.
From: editor@educate-yourself.org
Date: Thu, June 24, 2004 1:47 pm
To: "Little Buddha" <littlebuddha@blueyonder.co.uk>
Hello Lionel,
OK, last retort:
You were not pointing out some things of concern as you innocently posture,
but rather you were BELLOWING your negative opinions-in a mostly crude and
vulgar manner-about authors that I feature at my web site, and whom I respect.
I haven't spent more than a few lines with you or written a long response
to your statements because your bombastic opinions don't DESERVE more attention
than that.
I haven't misunderstood your intentions at all. I can see your intentions-and
your mind set-very clearly. Your paranoia is self evident when you allude
to "this dirty business" and "you now have taken the bait and
I know what your game is".
I have no difficulty in discerning a "genuine" person. I will gladly
concede that you are a "genuine person". I will also concede that
you are a gas bag and a twit who pummeled me with his unsolicited assessments
of people I hold in respect and INVITED the response you got.
Your 15 seconds are 'over and out' pal.
Final Sionara, Ken
PS: Actually, you started this thread in case you've lost sight of the fact
that YOU contacted ME.
PPS: Get a life... "Little Buddha" indeed.
Subject: Re: Fw: Fw: Fw: Matthew- claptrap.
From: "Little Buddha" <littlebuddha@blueyonder.co.uk>
Date: Thu, June 24, 2004 2:12 pm
To: editor@educate-yourself.org
Hi Ken,
I am explaining myself to Suzy at this present time and will get back to
you soon. She has taken the time to tell me how she feels about my emails
and she deserves my respect for that. At least she took the time to write
constructively to me and is at least polite about my comments, but I will
have to explain to her why I launched into such a venomous attack about her
sons info. So I am not such a hard case as you have concluded.
The 'Little Buddha' name came about when I had to have an email address and
at the time I was immersed into many aspects of Buddhism, so the name can
be quite misleading to others and make people even more angrier especially
if they receive one of my broadsides.
I apologise if I have upset you, you still have a good website despite my
opinions. I am prepared to expose anyone and anything if I feel strongly about
it.
The webmaster at www.crawford2000 removed an article by a character calling
himself Robert Ghost Wolf ,who was plagiarising the work of authentic authors
and had no right to do so, the webmaster stated that it was important to get
the info out there and I said at what cost to the original authors? He agreed
with me and pulled the item off his site.
Take care, Lionel Dass.
Subject: Why such Malice Ken.
From: "Little Buddha" <littlebuddha@blueyonder.co.uk>
Date: Fri, June 25, 2004 3:35 pm
To: editor@educate-yourself.org
Hello Ken, I did not realise that you had posted the emails regarding 'Matthew
Claptrap' onto your site as a thread. I never gave you my consent to do so,
nor was I aware that it had been done. I now can see why you continued to
email me as you wished to get some mileage out of the whole issue. Shame on
you to have sunk so low in the name of Truth. Suzy should be aware that you
have malice in your heart and perhaps she should avoid your site like the
plague.
I do not mind communicating in the public forum when the playing field is
level, but you play dirty. I had no idea that you had done this as I have
not visited your site until I received 2 emails today, one for and one against
my comments. If you continue to use the type of heading above my emails as
if to insinuate your own hidden agenda, then so much more the fool that you
undoubtedly are. And to think you call your website 'Educate Yourself' Well
it seems quite clear to me at least that you may be the one that requires
educating. How could you of posted the last email that I sent to you when
I stated to Suzy that I would keep this matter out of the public domain. You
have embarrassed her without realising so. You have no idea about how to respect
others, your blinded by your own sense of right and wrong from the lowest
level of all.
All information posted on this web site is
the opinion of the author and is provided for educational purposes only.
It is not to be construed as medical advice. Only a licensed medical doctor
can legally offer medical advice in the United States. Consult the healer
of your choice for medical care and advice.