By Philip N. Ledoux
http://educate-yourself.org/pnl/battleinheavens10nov05.shtml
November 10-14, 2005

Around 100 years ago there was an immigrant influx along our Northern borders, similar to today’s influx across our Southern borders. Most readers are aware of these “wetbacks” who got their nickname by swimming the Rio Grande. I make the analogous nickname to my French ancestors as “pine-needle-backs” because we sneaked over the border through the pine forests. In this French-American culture the name “Pierre” has come to be associated with buffoonery and humor. Thus the reference, in the below, to me as “Pierre.” (You didn’t know I had a humorous side? Ha, ha.)

From a rather small membership board, there was a posting that was politely asking me to do an interesting dowse. The sighting was the night of 10 November 2005:

Sightings all over US/Canada last night of "meteor showers" when NONE were due! Sounds like crashing DracoComplex ships to me, eh? Hmmmmm..... wonder what Señor Ledoux (Or is it Pierre?) & his swinging pendulum say? Steven.

This dowse resulted in my posting of the “How To” mitigate the planned upcoming state-wide California earthquakes. My friend Tim tipped me off to the schedule change on that prediction. By the time readers see this short essay, I will be either a hero or a villain, burned in effigy or praised. I’m only a “messenger” working in a quiet room trying to do what I believe the Almighty has assigned to me.

1. Has there been a genuine "shift" in last couple of days? Yes
2. Is it more than Jupiter entering Scorpio? Yes
3. Last night was there a genuine 3D space battle? Yes
4. Space ships were actually shot down in this battle? Yes
5. The battles were over US/Canada? Yes
6. The "shooting stars" were battle debris? Yes
7. Were Dracoes involved in the battles? Yes
8. Were friendly ETs involved in the battles? Yes
9. Battles were a "draw"? No
10. The friendly ETs were the winners? Yes
11. There will be many more such battles? Yes
12. Lasting for more than 5 years into the future? Yes
13. Can these "friendlies" prevent upcoming (in 3 days) California man created earthquakes? Yes
14. Steven has to call them to help? Possibly yes, possibly no
15. Collectively we must call them for help? Yes
16. Each of us "call" in the way we know best? Yes
17. The more of us calling the quicker the response? Yes

End of dowse
Philip N. Ledoux

A few days later this same small board saw this missive:

Philip: This dowsed information has changed since your dowsing because of the battle between benevolents & DracoComplex. I believe a high-percentage of the debris observed crashing to MotherEarth that "terrans"(us) observed in the US & Canada as meteorites (an assumption) were DracoComplex craft. Not many benevolents were killed. (Just a feeling, nothing dowsed by me on what I'm saying here, though.)

Perhaps you can dowse what percentage of the benevolents craft involved in the battle were Lyran craft, among other things. Perhaps seek out a timetable for a pick-up. “P” should be leading the crafts, but not sure of that either...Thanks!! steven.

Dowse:

In this battle of the night of 10 November 2005
1. were there DracoComplex craft involved? Yes
2. In this same battle were Lyran Complex craft involved? Yes
3. Were there other Nation-Complex craft involved? Yes
4. Was there more to this battle than the 3D portion we see? Yes
5. There was a larger 4D associated battle involved? Yes
6. We are told that we live a 3-Dimensional life to learn the lessons to move into the 4-Dimensional world. Is this factual? Yes
7. This 4D world is similar to our 3D world? Yes
8. With a higher level of learning to assimilate? Yes
9. Are the problems of the “unseen” 3D visible in 4D? Yes
10. An undeveloped 3D person could not handle visible 4D? Yes
11. Our stresses are limited to 3D because of this? Yes

12. Was “P” the commander of the Lyran crafts? Yes
13. Were the Lyrans here to pick-up “someone(s)”? Yes
14. One of their own kind? Yes
15. With additional “earthlings”? Yes
16. This seen battle-debris (battle) was to prevent “pick-up”? Yes
17. The battle was over the pick up of 7 individuals? Yes
18. Was Mr. “R” again picked up? Yes
19. Of the benevolent craft, what percentage were Lyrans? App 33%?
20. Of the benevolent craft, what percentage were Alpha Centurians? App 20%
21. Of the non-earth-friendly craft, what percentage were Draco? App 50%
22. Were there any Terran (earth) craft involved in the battle? Yes
23. Were the Terran craft to be considered benevolent? No
24. The Terran craft assisted the non-earth-friendly fleet? Yes
25. Would “traitors” be an appropriate label for Terran commanders? Yes

26. Can we undeveloped 3D people affect the outcome of these 3D-4D battles? Yes
27. Do the “benevolents” desire 3D assistance? Yes
28. Do the “benevolents” send messages to us undeveloped 3D people? Yes
29. In clear to understand 3D message formats? No
30. In 4D message formats? Yes
31. Which is: dreams? Yes;
intuition? Yes;
psychics/dowsers? Yes;
prophets? Yes;
TV evangelists? No,
earth-media? No
through what we think of as “dubious” means? Yes
32. Universal Law (God’s law) requires 4D messages to 3D people? Yes
33. Clarification: 4D messages of help to undeveloped 3D people? Yes

End of dowse
Philip N. Ledoux

**

14 November 2005

Friends,

The following message appeared on the educate-yourself_forum board. It helps to have a "thread" to the battle, in this case through an actual observer "Judith". Maybe I should have asked permission of Judith, yet I was all "primed" to dowse before I got a reply - and being a public board I took the liberty to use the information, which I lightly edited. (There must be thousands of "Judith" in southern Ohio. Smile)

There are many neophyte dowsers who have a combination of curiosity and disbelief over some of these dowses. I make a few comments to assist these people: Whether you realize it or not, you create an astral thread that connects somehow to the requested dowsing event. In some things that involve a chain of command I seem to "lock-in" on the operators and my friend seems to "lock-in" on administration, which gives him a 2 day edge over me. Notice how this dowse starts with a logical extraction of the observer's statements. The answer then leads one to "the next question". Gradually life experiences and reading knowledge gets mixed into creating "the next question", and finally all the observer's comments are used up, but "the next question" is developed from what I call "points of reference" that exist within one's head or brain. Readers in general are not interested in how to narrow down numbers, thusly 10 questions are condensed into one, a few other similar things are likewise condensed. (end of comments)

The message-post:
Hi. I'm in southern Ohio .. saw several lights moving in all directions .. and then one would look like it was a falling star, not shooting .. and then it would disappear and then reappear .. there were lots of them .. they were visible, then invisible .. but NOTHING came downward, like it was falling .. I can't for sure remember the times, but it was around 11 P.M. EST ... when we looked up into the sky .. there it was. Some were bright, some weren't .. but they were erratic in flight .. no pattern like an airplane, no pattern like debris, no pattern like shooting or falling stars.. many saw it.
Judith

The dowse:

1. Was the Battle that Judith saw over U.S. "soil"? Yes
2. Was the Battle that Judith saw over Canadian "soil"? Yes
3. The Battle area was approximately 1,500 miles in diameter? Yes
4. The perspective would make it appear "above"? Yes
5. The vision of "a falling star" was a space-craft? Yes
6. This "falling star" was a disabled craft? No
7. This "falling star" was a maneuvering craft? Yes
8. The "added power" made the craft visible? Yes
9. This was similar to the after-burner thrust on modern fighter jets? Yes
10. The "visible then invisible" was directly related to extra thrust? Yes

FROM THE PRIOR DOWSE:
>>THE "SHOOTING STARS" WERE BATTLE DEBRIS? YES
<< CAN BOTH 'POWER SURGE' AND DEBRIS BE CORRECT? YES

11. Debris would be seen but not falling to earth? Yes
12. "NOTHING came downward" because only partial maneuvers were seen? Yes
13. "some were bright, some weren't" is the difference between craft type? Yes
14. Some were more powerful than others? Yes
15. And this was the difference in brightness? Yes
16. "no pattern like an airplane" was because the total maneuvers were not visible? Yes
17. The extra needed power-phase made craft visible? Yes

18. Were craft damaged? Yes
19. The damage would force withdrawal from battle? Yes
20. Are there formal "rules of engagement" 'up there'? No
21. "anything goes" are the basic rules? Yes
22. There were approximately 60 craft involved? Yes
23. Space craft were equally divided between friendly and non-friendly? No
24. The battle started with approximately 7 space craft? Yes
25. Friendlies were outnumbered 3 to 1 ? Yes
26. The battle started as "dodge and seek"? Yes
27. Until "help" arrived? Yes
28. Then the actual battle took place? Yes
29. Friendlies were still outnumbered? Yes
30. Outnumbered approximately 2 to 1 ? Yes

31. If a craft were "shot down" would that be seen? Yes
32. Were any shot down in this battle? Yes
33. The "shooting down" weapons disintergrate-vaporize? Yes
34. This is why nothing seen falling to earth? yes (weak)
35. Approximately 12 craft total were casualties? Yes
36. In human terms "all hands lost"? Yes

37. The original "taxi" mission was successful? Yes
38. Some were injured? Yes
39. Some died? Yes
40. 2 "passengers" died? Yes
41. Of the crew of 7, 2 pilots died? Yes
42. Back-up pilots aboard? Yes

End of dowse
Philip N. Ledoux

© Copyright 2005 Educate-Yourself.org  All Rights Reserved.