By Philip N. Ledoux
http://educate-yourself.org/pnl/cvn74dowse29may05.shtml
May 29, 2005

Ken,

Here is a dowse that started out of curiosity, and ended up wishing I had never started the dowse! Here it is – for what it is worth department. This will be worse than 9-11 ugh. If it weren’t so serious, we could jokingly pass it all off onto Livingstone. As you know I put in 8 years in submarines; and my curiosity was peaked about the USS America. Philip N. Ledoux

29 May 2005

[The USS America was decommissioned in 1996. Technically the third Kitty Hawk class designated CVA-66. The CVA means "non-nuclear".]

Re:
Sinking of U.S. Navy Aircraft Carrier in Indian Ocean to Trigger War with Iran? By ZS Livingstone (May 27, 2005)
http://educate-yourself.org/zsl/aircraftcarriersinkingindianocean20may05.shtml

CVN-74 Dowse:

Is ZS Livingstone correct when he states: The sinking of the USS America is to gather data on how to sink a nuclear aircraft carrier? Yes

Although the hull is a non-nuclear? Yes

"Could this have been a test for a later crime in the Indian Ocean?" Yes

Is this why no former crew members were not allowed aboard for the tests? Yes

Is the target aircraft carrier to be sunk already decided upon? Yes

Is it a CVN? (Nuclear) Yes

(Several elimination dowses)

Is it CVN-74? Yes

Is the disaster planned to occur before the end of 2005? No

Before April 2006? Yes

Before March 2006? No

"it goes down in minutes killing 5,000 to 8,000 sailors"? Yes

The Pentagon is working on this plan right now? Yes

Are most of the planners Navy? Yes

Are all the planners Navy? No

Are there many objectors to the plan? Yes

Are there 275 people exposed to the plan? Yes

Are there 300 people exposed to the plan? No

50% or more object to the plan? Yes

60% or more object to the plan? No

Everyone exposed to the plan is sworn to secrecy? Yes

Is the president privy to the plan? Yes

Is the vice-president privy to the plan? Yes

The technical details of the scuttling are mostly set? Yes

The political and PR details are the big problem? Yes

Are the planners worried about atomic contamination? Yes

The top planners care little about atomic contamination? Yes

Will more than CVN-74 be lost in the disaster? Yes

By being pulled into the vortex of the sinking? Yes

Mostly Destroyer Escort type vessels? Yes

7 such vessels? Yes

Will the captain of the CVN-74 be privy to the plan? No

Will the Flag Admiral be privy to the plan? Yes

Will this Admiral be lost in the disaster? Yes

Will the Captain be lost in the disaster? Yes

Will the scuttling munitions be detonated by a timing device? No

Will the scuttling munitions be detonated by ship's personnel? Yes

Secret detonating wiring will be installed in these personnel's equipment? Yes

They will be doing one thing, yet actually detonating the explosives? Yes

The officers giving the command will be privy to the plan? No

The officers giving the command will be expecting one thing and not expecting detonating the explosives? Yes

None involved will be aware of the connection? Yes

To guarantee detonation, it has to be "hard wired"? Yes

The argument used to justify such a disaster:

Military personnel are expendable? Yes

Navy Brass are using this argument? No

A relatively new aircraft carrier is being used to make it more credible? Yes

The older (CV 63) is thought to bring suspicion to the public's mind? Yes

Will a "protective" submarine be lost in the disaster? Yes

All hands lost on the sub? Yes

The planners are believing they will loose only the aircraft carrier? Yes

Will the excessive loss of ships start a revolt in the military? Yes

Will ETs be involved in this fiasco? No

Will Dracoes be involved in this fiasco? No

Will Greys be involved in this fiasco? No

Will "saucers" be involved in this fiasco? Yes

Will the military revolt bring effective change? No

The revolt will be squelched almost immediately? Yes

Triggered by automated monitoring equipment? Yes

Nothing to do with the plan itself? Yes

End of dowse

Philip N. Ledoux

__________________________________________________

© Copyright 2005 Educate-Yourself.org  All Rights Reserved.