Latest Dowse on Reno, NV Earthquake and the Predicted New
Madrid Fault Quakes
By Philip N. Ledoux
http://educate-yourself.org/pnl/latestrenoandnewmadridfaultdowse29sep05.shtml
September 29, 2005
Ken,
A little background is needed on the following. You had asked
me to check Tim’s dowse for you on an expected earthquake on what
is known as the New Madrid Fault. Even I was taken aback at what it revealed.
Tim had it correct, apparently I have just enough life experiences to ask
more questions or maybe my mother was correct when she told me as an adult
that she was real glad when my “why phase” ended as a child.
(smile) I shared it with two of my current teacher/educator/mentors. There
seemed to be too lengthy a silence, and I wondered if I had put the proverbial
foot in my mouth routine. Then all of a sudden I had an urgent request for
a dowse which is below. The original questions from the request are in quotes.
Steven Dainis was so concerned about TPTB proposed earthquake planning that
he contacted “off earth friends” to do something! Steven’s
problem is that these “friends” never seem to give him any feedback,
but this time they asked for more information and then he sets again wondering,
but an earthquake outside Reno, Nevada came shortly after his request. This
might have been in response; but was it connected to the request? There
was a high probability (logically) that a military command for earthquake
control existed in that area, so the below dowse was requested. I think
you and your readers will be as surprised as I was at the results.
Reno, NV & the New Madrid Fault (MS) Dowse
"Was the Reno NV quake a type of "first-strike"
response and an effect caused by my invitaion to ("somebodys")
to do something about what TPTB planned for the New-Madrid-Faultline?"
Did "somebodys" respond to Steven's request? Yes
Response to TPTB plan for the New-Madrid Faultline? Yes
Was the Reno, Nevada quake related to this response? Yes
Was the quake the result of this response? Not yes,
not no
Was the quake a "first-strike" response? Yes
These "somebodys" are interested in current earth
events? Yes
These "somebodys" are not able to discern future
earth events? Yes
They need earthling observances for assistance? Yes
TPTB are able to hide intent from these "somebodys"?
Yes
TPTB are able to hide current operations from these "somebodys"?
Not yes, not no
Some technology prevents "somebodys" from observing?
Yes
Thus help from humans needed? Yes
Was the "first-strike" to eradicate TPTB equipment?
Yes
This equipment was to control earthquakes on the New-Madrid
Faultline? Yes
Were personnel killed in the "first-strike"? Yes
Only "on duty" personnel? Yes
Is there back-up equipment still operational? Yes
Can the back-up carry out the original plans of TPTB? No
Can the back-up be modified to carry out original plans?
Yes
Within 6 months? Yes
Will help be needed again, after that time? Yes
Are these "somebodys" aware of that future need?
No
Is this back-up in the same general area as the original
eqpt? Yes
"Did these somebody's get the location to strike first
from their own independent analysis of u-grnd-bases here is US w/quake-tech?"
Did these "somebodys" use their own technology
to find the quake making eqpt? Yes
They first had to know about the intended use? Yes
Then they could "zero in"? Yes
Do these "somebodys" target intent? Maybe
Do these "somebodys" target by following intended
use? Yes
Which leads to finding the equipment? Yes
"Did they collaborate with "Alliance" forces?"
Did these "somebodys" collaborate with other forces?
Not yes, not no
Do these "somebodys" work jointly with "Alliance"
forces? Yes
Through communication channels all forces become aware? Yes
Thus back-up is ready to help if needed? Yes
Was help needed to find the targeted quake center? Yes
Was available without really asking? Yes
If these "somebodys" are asked for help from humans
they have to complete the mission alone if possible? Yes
Their communications net automatically supplies back-up assistance?
Yes
"(Define ways of collaboration, if "Yes" answer
to this last one, Philip)"
Collaboration would include:"On site" needed equipment
that isn't there? Yes
Off planet earth analysis? Yes
Triangulation to pinpoint earth equipment/forces? Yes
Monitoring of TPTB protection equipment/forces for "somebodys"?
Yes
Verification of request/requestor's validity of request?
Yes
Analysis of information/request target threat? Yes
Reported threat potential harm/scope vs do not interfere?
Yes
This is a special council job/jurisdiction/decision? Yes
For fast response? Yes
This council answers to a higher council? Yes
All special council decisions reviewed by high council? Yes
Did special council know about Katrina? No
They didn't sense man made/directed? Yes
Had these "somebodys" been asked to interfere In
Katrina, would they have stopped the storm? Yes
Would they have destroyed the making/directing equipment?
No
Because some potential good comes from the equipment? Yes
": they responded mighty fast to my invite, Philip! Did
they do so because of what I am personally? because of my friendship with
THor? because of the work I have done already regarding reconnIasance during
dreamtimes from 1995-2002(about)?"
The quick response was a special council decision? Yes
First the problem had to be explained via a request for help?
Yes
These "somebodys" do not trust humans in general?
Yes
Are these "somebodys" aware of how thoroughly humans
are manipulated? Not yes, not no
TPTB hide the manipulation well enough to prevent most detection?
Yes
These "somebodys" are as deceived as humans are?
Yes
Steven is a trusted person by these "somebodys"?
Yes
Does friendship with THor make a difference in the trust?
No
Trusted from reconnaissance during Steven's dreamtimes 95-02?
Not yes, not no
Steven's abilities attracted these "somebodys"
to check him out? Yes
On this earth how many people are trusted by these "somebodys"
Around 175 people? Yes
Globally? Yes
Are these "somebodys" aware of the economic maze?
No
Would knowledge of it help these "somebodys" understanding
of earth's problems? Yes
Steven's honesty and abilities are the foundation Of the
trust/belief these "somebodys" have in Steven? Yes
"were they waiting for the go-ahead specifically from
me?" Is the "go ahead" desired from Steven by these "somebodys"?
No
Steven's reliability of "report" is first checked?
Yes
Then it is passed to the special council? Yes
Special council then asks for more info if needed? Yes
More info rarely required? Yes
Seriousness of situation then evaluated? Yes
Action then decided upon by special council? Yes
Steven is a type of reliable request source? Yes
A kind of "filter" to prevent overload of requests?
Yes
The Psi Ops Unit is aware of all this? Yes
Psi Ops tries to prevent Steven from making contact? Yes
To prevent these "somebodys" from knowing what
is happening? Yes
All information posted on this web site is
the opinion of the author and is provided for educational purposes only.
It is not to be construed as medical advice. Only a licensed medical doctor
can legally offer medical advice in the United States. Consult the healer
of your choice for medical care and advice.