Esposing the Bin Laden Smaoking' Video

Exposing the Bin Laden "Smoking" Video
[Editor's Note: The intelligent and discerning reader ought to be aware of the deception being played out here. The Illuminati controls the government of America and wants to install a One World corporate fascist regime organized along feudal lines of hierarchy in the very near future (2003 appears to be an important and pivotal year in that regard). They need to depopulate and destroy America politically in order to achieve that end. They destroy America by orchestrating a series of disasters that draws us into war, dispersing American troops overseas and using the excuse of 'terrorists and terrorism" to rob us of our constitutional liberties, setting the stage for a police state no different than Nazi Germany of the late 1930's. The Illuminati uses their media whores to rile up the naive, gullible, and uninformed members of the American public to focus their attention on 'getting' the patsy, Bin Laden, while swiftly implementing new controlling laws that undermine our last remaining vestiges of freedom and constitutional rights. They continue to rely on the tried and true technique of manufacturing conflict between two (or more) groups and take advantage of the emotionalism, anger, chaos, and despair engendered to manipulate millions of people in the direction that best serves their agenda. Bin Laden is quoted in this article as saying that he had nothing to do with organizing or directing the attacks of Sept. 11. He's likely telling the truth. These events are orchestrated and staged, having been scripted years ago by secretive Illuminati planners who now use their media stooges and political puppets to deliver their litany of lies into our living rooms every single day of the week, while concurrently raining down chemtrails into our lungs every time we step outside...Ken Adachi]
by Samata Ullah <samataullah@aol.com>
Dec. 16, 2001
http://educate-yourself.org/cn/2001/binladinsmokingvideoexpose16dec01.shtml
Contents:
Some Things to Ponder / Analysing "Bin Ladin's" Comments / Analysing the Video / Contradictions in the Video

Some Things to Ponder (Dec. 15, 2001)
A good article indicated below shows how 1 in 3 suspect the tape is a fraud and include some critical thoughts on the "smoking" tape. An excerpt: "There is clearly reason to doubt the tape. There is excessive noise on the audio track, making it impossible to really hear what is being said. Given that the tape was recorded in an area supposedly devoid of audio urban signature, there should have been little ambient noise, yet the speech is masked with a great deal of noise. Then there is that gap in the audio track, reminiscent of Nixon's missing 18 minutes, and the truths it once contained which are lost forever to history. Doubts have already been raised regarding the correct translation of Osama's words into "We", when his words could also mean "They"."
Read the full article at: http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/osamatape.html
This page ( http://11september.20m.com/latest_news/fake_video.htm) has good links with a few samples of things to contemplate concerning the technological possibilites of faking videos:
A) In the film Gladiator, Oliver Reed, one of the actors in the film died half way during the filming. Hollywood replaced him with a computer generated 'actor'. Quoting directly from the article: "....Then, renowned British actor Oliver Reed died suddenly of heart failure in the midst of filming and the special effects team had to generate the final scenes by scanning Reed's face onto a stunt-double's body. "
B) In the film Forrest Gump, Tom Hanks who plays Forrest Gump is seen shaking hands with President Kennedy. Quoting the article: ".....Forrest visits President Kennedy in the White House, receives the Medal of Honour, goes on TV with John Lennon, and shakes hands with President Nixon. Most of these scenes were created using computer generated imaging (C.G.I). Forrest Gump was one of the early movies to take advantage of C.G.I, demonstrating that sci-fi films are not the only genre of films that can benefit from special effects."

Analysing "Bin Ladin's" Comments (Dec. 14, 2001)

"The defense minister of the ousted Taleban regime in Afghanistan told the BBC that he was doubtful about the
recording's authenticity, saying it was unlikely that Bin Laden would have been naive enough to say such things on a recording." ( http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/world/south_asia/newsid_1710000/1710483.stm )

I think this is a credible assumption. Why would he want to convict himself with this video, knowing that there is the slight possibility of it getting into the wrong hands and therefore cementing the weak case against him?
Osama Bin Ladin said in an interview with a Pakistani newspaper (http://www.ummahnews.com/viewarticle.php?sid=1819), "I have already said that I am not involved in the 11 September attacks in the United States. As a Muslim, I try my best to avoid telling a lie. I had no knowledge of these attacks, nor do I consider the killing of innocent women, children and other humans as an appreciable act. Islam strictly forbids causing harm to innocent women, children and other people. Such a practice is forbidden even in the course of a battle."
Why for instance, if he knew the consequences if he was caught, would he still run the risk of getting caught by making a video which explicitly shows him confessing to the attack? Surely, wouldn't he have kept that a secret so that only close confidants would know that he responsible for the WTC attack thus cutting the risk of getting caught? I think it is absurd that he'd even think about making such a video and it only shows the sheepish mentality of the people who assume that he'd be stupid enough to make a video like that.
An excerpt from the "transcript" of the Bin Ladin Video tape:
[Speaking to Bin Ladin] Shaykh: "(...inaudible...) You have given us weapons, you have given us hope and we thank Allah for you."
This raises a question: Is there any proof that Osama Bin Ladin was giving weapons to people in Saudi Arabia? The video says so, so where is the evidence from intelligence sources which say that? It would be supremely stupid for the intelligence agencies not to have even mentioned that before or not to have known of that beforehand, so where are those reports?
This hints to me of a campaign of demonization against Bin Ladin, by those who want to further discredit him by suggesting that he provides weapons to foreign countries in order to "support terrorism". Aside from the difficulties of smuggling weapons from within Afghanistan, it is nearly impossible for Bin Ladin to buy illegal weapons for these people in Saudi Arabia if he chose another alternative to smuggling weapons outside of Afghanistan. Furthermore, where are these weapons being used? Who uses them and for what purpose? Think about it. I have never even heard of an indigenous Saudi rebel attempt of overthrowing the regime, have you? There certainly were isolated cases, but this was years ago. This video was recent, so it would suggest that this funding of "rebels" in Saudi Arabia would be current and ongoing. So why do we not hear of Saudi militant rebel groups? Certainly there can be people whose ideology expresses that desire, but the video suggests it is an armed struggle. I have not heard of any recent armed struggle in Saudi Arabia from conventional news or intelligence sources. One to think about!
Here's a sampling of emails critical of the Bin Ladin video which appeared on Rense.com:
1. "I have viewed exceprts from the 'Smoking Gun' bin Laden video and I can't see how anyone could mistake the actor on the video for Usama bin Laden. It seems that UbL has been gulping down more than his fair share of the "food aid" that is being dropped because he is obviously carrying a few more pounds, mostly in the face, since the videos screened on Al Jazeera not long ago, reportedly recorded only a few days earlier. I seem to associate the actor on the video more with Will Smith than with UbL.

It must further be mentioned that the parts of the audio that can be heard do not sound anything at all like the audio of bin Laden on the Al Jazeera broadcasts. In fact, it does not even sound like the arabic spoken by an arab. I wonder just how many people are falling for this deception after the 'planted spy' American Taliban debacle did not have the desired effect.

Sorry America, you guys are just being absolutely stupid in believing that shrub (bush jnr). You people should take note of the words of your Ben Franklin when he stated 'Those who would give up freedom for security deserve, and will get, neither.'"-Haroon Sulaiman
2. "The man that was purportedly Osama bin Laden was not. His profile did not match that of Osama. His nose was flatter than that of Osama. Take a look at past photographs and see for your self. This was a look-a-like."-Pat Taylor
3. Comment
From John Marshall
London, UK
12-13-1

"What the Bin Ladin Tape proves

The Bin Ladin video tape finally released by the Pentagon turned out to only prove four things:

1 - That the audio quality of Bin Ladins voice was the worst of those talking on the video (?)

2 - The sound was so bad that the Arabic grammer could be heard either way i.e. "we did" or "we said" could also be heard as "they did" or "they said" etc. Which means the difference between a person being a spectator or a mastermind.

3 - Bin Ladin must be exceedingly stupid to admit in an open dinner party (this while the US air force and special forces are carpet bombing the entire country) and with kids and guests all over the place that he planned and carried out the WTC attacks while previousely declaring to the World he had nothing to do with it.

4 - If he is that stupid then there is no way a person of that level of intelligence could have pulled oof the sophisticated operation Washington claims he did from the caves of Afghanistan.

Where is the "concrete" evidence they claimed to have before that is still being hidden from us?? "

That last comment reminds me of this critique of the 21 page document which "proved" that Bin Ladin did it:
http://www.independent.co.uk/story.jsp?story=98195

Analysing the Video (Dec. 13, 2001)
OK, lets get down to business. Lets take a good look at two pictures taken off the video:

      "Smoking" Video "Bin Ladin"
You decide who that is! If you guess correctly you can win one of the fabulous prizes we have on offer!
Now lets see a picture taken from one of his videos which was taken outside and was therefore expected to be of less quality:


Bin Ladin video taken outside
First, the difference in quality is staggering! The video shot outside was of such good quality and the video shot inside was of such dubious quality, that it makes me wonder. Why should the new "video" just released by the Americans be of such bad picture quality if it was shot inside and therefore had no weather conditions affecting it?
Why is the video shot outside of such high quality? Assuming that Bin Ladin shot the new ("smoking") video, why did he not use the good quality camera which he obviously used judging by the video shot outside?
What we have here is a video which purports to be of Bin Ladin, yet the video quality is so bad that one cannot honestly confirm whether that is really Bin Ladin! So why have we got such a bad quality video when we know that Bin Ladin is capable of shooting better quality video?
This video is supposed to confirm his guilt, yet we cannot confirm if it's even Bin Ladin on the video! I really don't expect this nonsense from a government. Are they that desperate? Obviously, if America expects us to believe them, then they should have presented us a video which actually shows Bin Ladin!
Second, please take a closer look at the video. Please look at Ayman Al-Zawarih's lips when speaking. This is the only man in the video whose face looks towards the camera while actually speaking a long sentence, and guess what? Yup, the synchronization of the voice and the video image of his lips are not in tune with each other! Please take a look at the video if you don't believe me.
Another point is the actual circumstances of the video. Why does this only show up in Jalalabad and there is only one copy? If it was for distribution, then there would have been lots of copies made; yet we only have one!
Consider the sound quality. The sound is clearly inaudible at places, and the rest of the sound is affected by the distortions of the camera. How can we assume that Bin Ladin said what the translators wrote down if it is so distorted?
Why would they want to film themselves anyway?
Think about it. You just committed the greatest act of terrorism the world has ever seen and you deny that you did it. You'd at least be careful and never allow any opportunity for this confession to become public. So why would you be so stupid as to film the confession even though you would know there is some possibility that your video confession would fall into the wrong hands?
Would it not be better to just have the meeting without the risk of this worthless (but incriminating) video taped discussion? It was just a discussion and recap with a couple of men discussing something. Surely it does not have to be taped to be shown to every Al-Qaeda member! Using the logic that any random worthless discussion (to ordinary Al-Qaeda members) would have been taped, why have they only found this single incriminating discussion?
I'd like to emphasize: if one reads the transcript of the discussion, one would get the impression that it is just an ordinary meeting, sort of like a "how are you doing?" meeting, yet this "confession" just happens to get taped. Why?
[These two paragraphs below were taken from http://11september.20m.com/latest_news/oops.htm which features my 12th December article, but interpolated with two good paragraphs which I reproduce now]
All of Bin Laden's other videos have been exceptional quality, why is only this "smoking" video of such bad quality?
What was supposed to be the purpose of this video? If Bin Laden was keeping a video diary, then must be many other videos. Why was only this one video found?
Contradictions in the Video (Dec. 12, 2001)
A contradiction exists between Bin Ladin's "new video" and the letters of the hijackers. The new video claims to have "proof" that Bin Ladin was responsible for the attack. OK, but why does it say that he thought the hijackers did not know they were about to commit suicide? Did not the letters "uncovered" by the FBI from the "hijackers" luggage shortly after the WTC attack claim that they knew they were about to commit suicide?
Therefore we have a contradiction. Bin Laden "claims" (on this new "video") that the hijackers did NOT know they were about to commit suicide. Yet a few weeks ago, when the hijackers luggage was "discovered" by the FBI, the letters said that the hijackers KNEW that they were going to commit suicide on the planes. Why such a big discrepancy?
Obviously the lies have reached such a point where they have gotten clumsy.
Also, why was an ARABIC "video" found in Jalalabad, where the local people don't speak Arabic? If it was intended for distribution around the Arabic world, then they'd at least find more of these tapes, right?
Another thing. This seems to me to be an attempt to further demonize Bin Ladin by saying that he "tricks" people into commiting suicide, thus making more people in the Muslim world oppose him and bring discredit to some of the just causes he stands for.
Finally, if people explain away this contradiction as a "lack of knowledge due to the cells being separate", then how can Bin Ladin be blamed for organizing this operation if he did not know what they going to do? Think about it. If these "terrorist" cells really didn't know what each other was doing, how can we blame Osama for the attacks? So, if people explain the contradictions between Bin Ladin's video and the letters of the "hijackers" as due to the fact that these cells don't know what each other cell is doing, then we CANNOT blame Osama for "conceiving, organising and carrying out the attacks".
Samata Ullah

Samata Ullah's web site is http://www.angelfire.com/ab6/waragainstislam/
Article web posted at: http://www.angelfire.com/ab6/waragainstislam/contradiction.htm
The reality of the bombing campaign being waged in Afghanistan can be seen in this photo taken from Samata Ullah's web site showing a grieving Afghan father with his dead children. [Ken Adachi]

Free Newsletter

Join the Educate-Yourself Discussion Forum

All information posted on this web site is the opinion of the author and is provided for educational purposes only. It is not to be construed as medical advice. Only a licensed medical doctor can legally offer medical advice in the United States. Consult the healer of your choice for medical care and advice.