From Trueman Tuck, Leader of the Republican Party of Ontario
http://educate-yourself.org/cn/canadaC51C52update18jun08.shtml
June 18, 2008

Canadian Conservatives Push C-51/C-52; Ontario Resistance Urge E-Protest Surge- June 18th 2008

Forward courtesy of Chri Gupta

Health Freedom Update RE: Continuing our collective efforts to stop Bill C-51 passing second reading
 
Wednesday Night June 18th 2008
 
From Trueman Tuck, Leader of the Republican Party of Ontario
 
WE are in the home stretch; we must keep up our E-Protest SURGE going to clearly convince the Conservative LEADERSHIP not to debate Bill C-51 tomorrow or Friday if the House sits till then. THEY will then be gone until at least Mid September.
 
Be sure to go to our website www.republicanpartyofontario.ca and send E-Protest Action letters immediately.
 
We also need everyone in Ontario to become a member and or to donate to our new registered political Party - the Republican Party of Ontario. We are a registered Ontario Political Party and can issue tax receipts.
 
If you are in Canada, but not in Ontario please go to www.republicanpartyofcanada.ca and join, we are not a registered federal party yet, but certainly based upon how Bill C-51, Bill C-52 and the Natural Health Product Regulations are being handled by the Conservatives, we need to change our Health Freedom Movement into a ?Freedom of Choice? Peoples? rights party.
 
You can also click on the links provided below to send the E-Protest Action Letters.

*   Harper & Cabinet Ministers
*   Standing Committee of Health
*   Canadian Senators
*   Canadian Members of Parliament
*   Conservative MPs
*   Liberal MPs
*   NDP MPs
*   BLOC MPs
*   Independent MPs
 
 
We need to initiate our Freedom of Choice in Health Care legal actions to get a Court to cancel the Natural Health Product Drug Class Regulations and to protect Provincial jurisdiction and our individual Human Rights. After 13 years struggling to raise sufficient funds to sustain our lawsuits we felt that the registered political party gave us the best tax deduction percentage as well as the freedom to use our party?s funds to legally and politically challenge the monopoly main two parties using their own tools against them.
 
For whatever reasons, the Conservative Party of Canada Leadership is still determined to force Bill C-51 though as soon as possible. It is again scheduled for debate tomorrow as BILL NUMBER 5. See link and full text below - http://www2.parl.gc.ca/HousePublications/Publication.aspx?Pub=projected&Language=E&Mode=1&Parl=39&Ses=2
 
 Section Home

 
Publications - June 19, 2008
Order Paper and Notice Paper | Projected Order of Business
Options
Back to publications
 

HOUSE OF COMMONS
CHAMBRE DES COMMUNES
39th PARLIAMENT, SECOND SESSION
39^e L?GISLATURE, DEUXI?ME SESSION
116th SITTING
116^e S?ANCE
Projected Order of Business
Ordre projet? des travaux
(subject to change without notice)
(sujet ? changement sans pr?avis)
Thursday, June 19, 2008
Le jeudi 19 juin 2008

10:00 a.m.
10 heures
ROUTINE  PROCEEDINGS:
AFFAIRES COURANTES :
Tabling of Documents
D?p?t de documents
Introduction of Government Bills
D?p?t de projets de loi ?manant du gouvernement
Statements by Ministers
D?clarations de ministres
Presenting Reports from Interparliamentary Delegations
Pr?sentation de rapports de d?l?gations interparlementaires
Presenting Reports from Committees
Pr?sentation de rapports de comit?s
Introduction of Private Members' Bills
D?p?t de projets de loi ?manant des d?put?s
First reading of Senate Public Bills
Premi?re lecture des projets de loi d?int?r?t public ?manant du S?nat
Motions
Motions
Presenting Petitions (15 minutes maximum)
Pr?sentation de p?titions (maximum de 15 minutes)
Questions on the Order Paper
Questions inscrites au Feuilleton
REQUESTS FOR EMERGENCY DEBATES
DEMANDES DE D?BATS D?URGENCE
GOVERNMENT ORDERS
ORDRES ?MANANT DU GOUVERNEMENT
Government Bills (Commons)
Projets de loi ?manant du gouvernement (Communes)
C-5 ? The Minister of Natural Resources ? Nuclear Liability and Compensation Act ? Third reading (resuming debate on the previous question moved by Mr. Lukiwski (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons and Minister for Democratic Reform))
C-5 ? Le ministre des Ressources naturelles ? Loi sur la responsabilit? et l'indemnisation en mati?re nucl?aire ? Troisi?me lecture (reprise du d?bat sur la question pr?alable propos?e par M. Lukiwski (Secr?taire parlementaire du leader du gouvernement ? la Chambre des communes et ministre de la r?forme d?mocratique))
Length of speeches, pursuant to Standing Orders 43 and 74:
Dur?e des discours, conform?ment aux articles 43 et 74 du R?glement :
The Prime Minister and the Leader of the Opposition ? unlimited time and speeches are subject to a 10-minute question and comment period.
Le premier ministre et le chef de l'Opposition ? aucune limite et les discours peuvent faire l'objet d'une p?riode de questions et d'observations de 10 minutes.
All other Members ?
Tous les autres d?put?s  ?
       During the next 2 hours and 39 minutes of debate ? 20 minutes maximum and speeches are subject to a 10-minute question and comment period.
       Durant les 2 heures et 39 minutes de d?bat ? venir ? maximum de 20 minutes et les discours peuvent faire l'objet d'une p?riode de questions et d'observations de 10 minutes.
       After the period of debate referred to above ? 10 minutes maximum and speeches are subject to a 5-minute question and comment period.
       Apr?s la p?riode de d?bat mentionn?e ci-dessus ? maximum de 10 minutes et les discours peuvent faire l'objet d'une p?riode de questions et d'observations de 5 minutes.

C-7 ? The Minister of Transport, Infrastructure and Communities ? An Act to amend the Aeronautics Act and to make consequential amendments to other Acts ? Third reading (resuming debate on the amendment of Mr. Masse (Windsor West))
C-7 ? Le ministre des Transports, de l?Infrastructure et des Collectivit?s ? Loi modifiant la Loi sur l'a?ronautique et d'autres lois en cons?quence ? Troisi?me lecture (reprise du d?bat sur l?amendement de M. Masse (Windsor-Ouest))
Length of speeches, pursuant to Standing Orders 43 and 74:
Dur?e des discours, conform?ment aux articles 43 et 74 du R?glement :
The Prime Minister and the Leader of the Opposition ? unlimited time and speeches are subject to a 10-minute question and comment period.
Le premier ministre et le chef de l'Opposition ? aucune limite et les discours peuvent faire l'objet d'une p?riode de questions et d'observations de 10 minutes.
All other Members ? 10 minutes maximum and speeches are subject to a 5-minute question and comment period.
Tous les autres d?put?s  ? maximum de 10 minutes et les discours peuvent faire l'objet d'une p?riode de questions et d'observations de 5 minutes.

C-53 ? The Minister of Justice ? An Act to amend the Criminal Code (auto theft and trafficking in property obtained by crime) ? Second reading (first time debated)
C-53 ? Le ministre de la Justice ? Loi modifiant le Code criminel (vol d'automobile et trafic de biens criminellement obtenus) ? Deuxi?me lecture (commencement du d?bat)
Length of speeches, pursuant to Standing Orders 43 and 74:
Dur?e des discours, conform?ment aux articles 43 et 74 du R?glement :
The Prime Minister and the Leader of the Opposition ? unlimited time and speeches are subject to a 10-minute question and comment period.
Le premier ministre et le chef de l'Opposition ? aucune limite et les discours peuvent faire l'objet d'une p?riode de questions et d'observations de 10 minutes.
First Member of each recognized party in the first round of speeches ? 20 minutes maximum and speeches are subject to a 10-minute question and comment period.
Premier d?put? de chaque parti reconnu pendant la premi?re s?rie de discours ? maximum de 20 minutes et les discours peuvent faire l'objet d'une p?riode de questions et d'observations de 10 minutes.
During the 5 hours of debate following the first round of speeches ? 20 minutes maximum and speeches are subject to a 10-minute question and comment period.
Durant les 5 heures de d?bat qui suivent la premi?re s?rie de discours ? maximum de 20 minutes et les discours peuvent faire l'objet d'une p?riode de questions et d'observations de 10 minutes.
After the period of debate referred to above ? 10 minutes maximum and speeches are subject to a 5-minute question and comment period.
Apr?s la p?riode de d?bat mentionn?e ci-dessus ? maximum de 10 minutes et les discours peuvent faire l'objet d'une p?riode de questions et d'observations de 5 minutes.

Government Bills (Senate)
Projets de loi ?manant du gouvernement (S?nat)
S-3 ? The Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada ? An Act to amend the Criminal Code (investigative hearing and recognizance with conditions) ? Second reading (resuming debate)
S-3 ? Le ministre de la Justice et procureur g?n?ral du Canada ? Loi modifiant le Code criminel (investigation et engagement assorti de conditions) ? Deuxi?me lecture (reprise du d?bat)
Length of speeches, pursuant to Standing Orders 43 and 74:
Dur?e des discours, conform?ment aux articles 43 et 74 du R?glement :
The Prime Minister and the Leader of the Opposition ? unlimited time and speeches are subject to a 10-minute question and comment period.
Le premier ministre et le chef de l'Opposition ? aucune limite et les discours peuvent faire l'objet d'une p?riode de questions et d'observations de 10 minutes.
All other Members ?
Tous les autres d?put?s  ?
During the next hour and 17 minutes of debate ? 20 minutes maximum and speeches are subject to a 10-minute question and comment period.
Durant l?heure et les 17 minutes de d?bat ? venir ? maximum de 20 minutes et les discours peuvent faire l'objet d'une p?riode de questions et d'observations de 10 minutes.
After the period of debate referred to above ? 10 minutes maximum and speeches are subject to a 5-minute question and comment period.
Apr?s la p?riode de d?bat mentionn?e ci-dessus ? maximum de 10 minutes et les discours peuvent faire l'objet d'une p?riode de questions et d'observations de 5 minutes.
Government Bills (Commons)
Projets de loi ?manant du gouvernement (Communes)
C-51 ? The Minister of Health ? An Act to amend the Food and Drugs Act and to make consequential amendments to other Acts ? Second reading (resuming debate)
C-51 ? Le ministre de la Sant? ? Loi modifiant la Loi sur les aliments et drogues et d'autres lois en cons?quence ? Deuxi?me lecture (reprise du d?bat)
Length of speeches ? see note under Bill C-7.
Dur?e des discours ? voir note sous le projet de loi C-7. 
 
C-54 ? The Minister of Health ? Human Pathogens and Toxins Act ? Second reading (first time debated)
C-54 ? Le ministre de la Sant? ? Loi sur les agents pathog?nes humains et les toxines ? Deuxi?me lecture (commencement du d?bat)
Length of speeches ? see note under Bill C-53.
Dur?e des discours ? voir note sous le projet de loi C-53.

2:00 p.m.
14 heures
STATEMENTS BY MEMBERS
D?CLARATIONS DE D?PUT?S
Length of statements ? one minute maximum.
Dur?e des d?clarations ? maximum d'une minute.

2:15 p.m. ? (not later than)
14 h 15 ? (au plus tard)
ORAL QUESTIONS
QUESTIONS ORALES

3:00 p.m.
15 heures
BUSINESS OF THE HOUSE ? Weekly Statement
TRAVAUX DE LA CHAMBRE ? D?claration hebdomadaire
GOVERNMENT ORDERS
ORDRES ?MANANT DU GOUVERNEMENT
See list under this same heading earlier today.
Voir la liste sous cette m?me rubrique plus t?t aujourd?hui.

5:30 p.m.
17 h 30
PRIVATE MEMBERS' BUSINESS
AFFAIRES ?MANANT DES D?PUT?S
C-521 ? Mr. Lemay (Abitibi?T?miscamingue) ? Employment Insurance Surplus Transfer Act ? Second reading (first time debated)
C-521 ? M. Lemay (Abitibi?T?miscamingue) ? Loi pr?voyant le transfert de l?exc?dent du Compte d?assurance-emploi ? Deuxi?me lecture (commencement du d?bat)
Length of speeches, pursuant to Standing Order 95(1):
Dur?e des discours, conform?ment ? l'article 95(1) du R?glement :
Member moving motion ? 15 minutes maximum and the speech is subject to a 5-minute question and comment period.
D?put? qui propose la motion ? maximum de 15 minutes et le discours peut faire l'objet d'une p?riode de questions et d'observations de 5 minutes.
All other Members ? 10 minutes maximum.
Tous les autres d?put?s ? maximum de 10 minutes.

6:30 p.m.
18 h 30
ADJOURNMENT PROCEEDINGS
D?BAT D'AJOURNEMENT
Divided into 3 periods of 10 minutes maximum:
Temps divis? en 3 p?riodes d'une dur?e maximale de 10 minutes :
Member raising the question ? 4 minutes maximum.
D?put? qui soul?ve la question ? maximum de 4 minutes.
Minister or Parliamentary Secretary replying ? 4 minutes maximum.
Ministre ou secr?taire parlementaire qui donne la r?plique ? maximum de 4 minutes.
Member?s reply ? 1 minute maximum.
R?plique du d?put? ? maximum de 1 minute.
Minister or Parliamentary Secretary?s second reply ? 1 minute maximum.
Seconde r?plique du ministre ou du secr?taire parlementaire ? maximum de 1 minute.

7:00 p.m.
19 heures
ADJOURNMENT OF THE HOUSE
AJOURNEMENT DE LA CHAMBRE
PROJECTION FOR SUBSEQUENT DAYS
PROJECTION POUR LES PROCHAINS JOURS

FRIDAY, JUNE 20, 2008
LE VENDREDI 20 JUIN 2008
Private Members' Business
Affaires ?manant des d?put?s
C-303 ? Ms. Savoie (Victoria) ? Early Learning and Child Care Act ? Third reading (first time debated)
C-303 ? M^me Savoie (Victoria) ? Loi sur l'apprentissage et la garde des jeunes enfants ? Troisi?me lecture (commencement du d?bat)
 
It is time for the Health Freedom Movement to realistically deal with the deep roots of the TREE OF EVIL that keeps fueling these decade after decade deliberate, malicious and unjustified attacks on our most fundamental and GOD GIVEN unalienable rights, freedoms and liberties. This is no longer just about the July 1^st 1997 last attempt to unlawfully change our 50,000 plus ultra low risk herbs, vitamins, minerals, and other ?Healthy? life giving dietary foods, food supplements, beverages, nutrient-rich plant extracts and concentrates, etc. including ?Green?s Drinks? and ?Carrot Juice? into new and heavily federally regulated under threat of criminal conviction ?DRUGS? or the January 1^st 2004 same process or now the Bill C-51 and C-52 attempts to add legislative colouring of lawfulness to these out of jurisdiction, unlawful and against public interest schemes.
 
The following points reveal the "DEMONS" / "EVIL" behind these longstanding BIG PHARMA GLOBAL SCHEMES;
 
POINT # 1
 
The entire premise that has been used since the 1920 and 1927 amendments to the then federal ?Adulteration and Fraud Act? to create an illogical and unenforceable criminal series of offences is and must be to address actual serious national deaths and hospitalizations of sufficient proportionate national scale to justify section 91 [27] federal jurisdiction.
 
Quite simply put, there is no evidence-based justification for ANY criminal conviction sanctioned jurisdiction by the federal Parliament, the federal Senate, the Courts and the federal bureaucracy!
 
IT IS THAT SIMPLE.
 
We concur that there needs to be modern updated legislation to provide "REAL" protection to prevent unnecessary deaths and hospitalizations from "THERAPEUTIC PRODUCTS" which the current Minister of Health is a dismal failure under current legislation at doing.
 
It is our legislative proposal that Bills C-51, C-52 and the Natural Health Product Regulations are cancelled immediately and that a real grassroots stakeholder process is initialized immediately to develop amendments to the existing criminal code and a government bill be developed and implemented to create a death registry, mandatory hospitalization reporting register and a mandatory business register -- not ?LICENCING?. Our proposal calls for the act to be named ?THE HUMAN HEALTH AND SAFETY ACT? and apply to all ?Products, Services, Procedures, Devices, etc. used on, in and / or around Human Beings?.
 
POINT # 2
 
OUR COALITION OVER THE LAST 13 YEARS HAS FULLY DOCUMENTED THE UNBELIEVABLE EVIDENCE-BASED FACT THAT HEALTH CANADA, IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE CANADIAN FOOD INSPECTION AGENCY, THE CANADIAN BORDER SERVICES AGENCY, THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE AND THE RCMP ARE ACTUALLY THE GREATEST DANGER TO THE GOOD HEALTH AND WELL-BEING OF CANADIANS IN CANADA!
 
Our evidence as indicated recently by one of our Coalition Member?s Criminal / Constitutional Lawyers  is that tens of thousands of Canadians are unnecessarily dying each year because of the failure of the named federal entities to properly enforce the existing legislation against ?MODERN CHEMICAL MEDICINE? and the unjustified and biased inference in ?TRADITIONAL HOLISTIC MEDICINE?.
 
This has been fully documented in Dr. Carolyn Deans and Trueman Tuck?s award winning book first published in 2004 called ?Death by Modern Medicine? [see www.deathbymodernmedicine.com].
 
This book with evidence extracted from government and the ?Modern Medical Industry?s own records, proves that at a minimum there are 782,000 preventable mis-adventure deaths in the USA and Canada from the ?MODERN CHEMICAL MEDICAL ESTABLISHMENT? every year.
 
This is equivalent to Seven (7) jumbo jets full of people dying needlessly every day, 365 days a year!
 
POINT # 3
 
The host of so-called horrors that the Natural Health Product Regulations, Bills C-51 and C-52 are supposed to address, which the following Myths have been the favourite for decades are pure fiction and no one has ever written a detailed book and / or provided any detailed report showing proportionate evidence based statistics to back up these widely distributed and exaggerated lies and propaganda statements.
 
Next time you hear one of these canned lies, simply ASK FOR THE EVIDENCE AND SPECIFIC CASES!
 
"THEIR" favourite misinformation lies that continually reoccur decade after decade ever since the first systematic attacks on "Traditional Holistic Health" started by federal regulators, not only in Canada, but globally in the mid 1970?s are as follows:
 
Myth # 1
 
"We must ensure that what is on the label is actually in the bottle".
 
Myth # 2
 
"We must ensure that the product is safe"
 
Myth # 3
 
"We must ensure that the product is properly manufactured".
 
Myth # 4
 
"We must ensure that the claims are truthful"
 
Myth # 5
 
"We must protect Canadians from any possible harm".
 
Myth # 6
 
"We must ensure that all products have a federally approved label on the product that is in metric and bilingual French and English"
 
Myth # 7
 
"We are from the federal government and "WE" are here to help you".
 
AND,
 
The biggest lie / Myth of all # 8,
 
WE are implementing the Natural Health Product drug subclass Regulations and Bills C-51 and C-52 solely to improve our ability to "Protect the Health of Canadians"  
 
Point # 4
 
The simple fact is that the Health Canada bureaucracy has become more powerful than any other government operation and literally is a self-feeding "EMPIRE" that needs to be 100% closed down.
 
There is not a single lawful activity occurring in Health Canada other than being a section 91 [27] Criminal police force to deal with deaths and hospitalizations actually occurring from ?Adulteration and Fraud?.
 
You need to understand that the Health Canada bureaucracy is totally out of control, and that the various Committees of Parliament and the Senate must regain control of this bureaucracy and stop the massive jurisdiction intrusions into exclusive areas of Provincial jurisdiction and the violations of the Rule of Law, Implied Bill of Rights and Written and Unwritten Constitution and extensive criminal activities including deliberately posting false allegations of adulteration and fraud.
 
Our Coalition has documented six actual cases where 9 different times Health Canada has deliberately lied about products being adulterated and dangerous and posted global warning for the sole purpose of destroying financially small family enterprises in the natural health industry.
 
Our Coalition has filed written criminal complainants with the RCMP Commissioner about Health Canada being guilty of negligent Homicide that remain unacknowledged and not investigated.
 
Health Canada does not even acknowledge that it is SOLELY, a criminal police operation.  It conducts a criminal investigative police operation with the most extreme local discretionary police powers, without Rule of Law and Constitutional safeguards against corruption and abuse and any administrative and / or internal affairs review system!
 
CAN YOU BELIEVE that there is currently no published legislatively created independent Administrative / Early Resolution Ombudsman office, no published Internal Affairs review system, and our Coalition has proof of potential criminal code violations by Health Canada staff that was documented and sent to the RCMP and has been ignored.
 
This is a major flaw in the Natural Health Product Regulations, the existing legislation and Bills C-51 and C-52, the total lack of a legislative "Ombudsman / Early Conflict Resolution system" and of an "Internal Affairs" complaint system.
 
In 1997 and 1998 there was a massive call for an independent investigation into the out-of-control Health Canada bureaucracy that never happened. Our Coalition and others have continued for 11 years in hundreds of communications and meetings to call upon those who on behalf of the PEOPLE control Ottawa to immediately initiate this long overdue investigation.
 
NO INVESTIGATION HAS OCCURRED YET!
 
 
POINT # 5
 
The Natural Health Product Regulations, Bills C-51 & C-52 all contain novel Rule of Law / Constitutional premise change that would instantly destroy several thousand years of FUNDAMENTAL UNALIENABLE RIGHTS under criminal law.
The second last paragraph of the proposed Bill C-51 preamble reads as follows:
?Whereas the Parliament of Canada recognizes that it is the responsibility of regulated persons to ensure that only products that meet legislative requirements are available to the public;?
 
This statement is more consistent with European / Ancient Roman Empire / Mexico?s Draconian Napoleonic code than with Canada?s Written and Unwritten constitutional history. There is no constitutionally valid jurisdiction in the Parliament of Canada to create such a ?White List? Civil / Roman Law type permissive licensing federal regulatory scheme. This ?Reverse Onus? concept does not exist under British Rule of Common Law and cannot lawfully exist due to constitutional principles in Canada.
 
It is the government?s responsibility under Criminal Law to have substantive ?Probable Cause? before as criminal investigates police officers intervening and violating various fundamental human and civil rights.
 
Just look at Mexican justice and what happened to Brenda Martin.
 
DO YOU WANT EUROPEAN / ROMAN AND MEXICAN JUSTICE TO REPLACE OUR RULE OF LAW, IMPLIED BILL OF RIGHTS AND WRITTEN AND UNWRITTEN CONSTUTITION?
 
 
POINT # 6
 
 
The Natural Health Product Regulations and Bills C-51 and C-52 are a direct infringement, denial and violation of the over one thousand years of evolution of the British Rule of Common Law, our individual human being Implied bill of Rights, the British and Canadian Written and Unwritten Constitution and the traditional emphasis on the personal, individual fundamental rights, freedoms, liberties and protection of free trade and commerce and property that has given the British Commonwealth countries the finest democratic ?Civilized Rule of Law Society? in modern recorded history for over 2,000 years.
 
The following are just a few of the examples of the fascist / socialistic doctrines and violations occurring in the Natural Health Product Regulations and Bills C-51 and C-52;
 
[a] There is only federal jurisdiction based upon section 91 [27] ? this means that attempting to use force and threats of federal government criminal prosecution and conviction is ridiculous given the RISK CLASS 6 rating of the over 50, 000 ultra safe dietary food supplements as being attempted to do in the Natural Health Product Regulations and Bills C-51 and C-52,
 
[b] Attempting to force tens of thousands of  businesses to have a mandatory ?Site License? to continue to earn a living and carry on trade and commerce is an affront to everything that our parents and their parents sacrificed so much to protect in the First and Second World Wars.
 
There is an excellent article ? on this ?Fascist / Socialist? attempts to use money instead of guns to enslave and control mankind in accordance the dreams and stated goals of the terrible tyrants such as Stalin, Hitler, etc.
 

The Coastal Post - October, 1995

Fascism And Socialism Explained

Have you ever wondered why the Nazis called themselves the "National Socialist Party," and why the Soviets called themselves "Socialist Republics"? In history and political science classes we were told that the Nazis were "fascists" and that the Soviets were "communists." It is not hard to come to the conclusion that people living under fascism and people living under communism seemed to be coming out in the same place....as terrified slaves (if not dead).

Properly understood, fascism and communism were, as the Soviet and German labels openly declared, actually the same thing:, just two varieties of socialism. The fascist praises the free market, but secretly works to destroy it. The communist condemns the free market and openly works to destroy it. Both tactics are tools of a monopolistic type of parasitism known as socialism. The key goal in either case is the destruction of economic market competition so that certain ruthless individuals can acquire huge wealth and power. The wars between the fascists and the communists in the 20th century have simply been wars fought between competing monopolists.

If the communists had their way, the world would be one giant monopoly government devoid of any troublesome "free market economy." A one-world communist government would control every aspect of a world economy. Nothing would be left to the untidy devices of the free market. Wages and prices would be controlled by government fiat.

If the fascists had their way, the world would be one giant monopoly corporation devoid of any troublesome "free market economy." A one-world fascist government would control every aspect of a world economy. Nothing would be left to the untidy devices of the free market. Wages and prices would be controlled by a central bank, fiat currency, and interest rate manipulations.

Fascist socialism is more subtle than communist socialism. One form of tyranny has corporate logos pasted across the landscape, while the other has government logos pasted over the landscape. The Japanese pledge loyalty to the Corporation. The Cubans pledge loyalty to the Party. Communist socialism (less China's meager one billion strong) is falling apart because it wasn't seductive enough. Fascistic socialism is thriving because it is incredibly clever and devious.. Corporate Earth will simply take a bit longer to build than Communist Earth because the fascists have learned from the mistakes of those heavy-handed commies and are now doing things with a lot more delicacy.

What is GATT? What is NAFTA? They are both monopolistic corporate tools masquerading as "free market" devices, aren't they? Both allow corporations to exploit the cheapest labor market across national boundaries. The goal of GATT and NAFTA is to erase national borders through economic manipulation. Sounds sort of like world communism to me. So what's going on here? Well, I'll tell you.

Here is the "revelation of the method" that can turn on that light bulb in your mind. It is based on one key understanding: socialism is actually the invention of the designers of monopolistic capitalism.

Capitalism is good if government doesn't interfere or take sides. Such does not exist anywhere in the world today. Capitalism becomes something else that is very bad (and is not even capitalism anymore) when government interferes with competition and takes the side of various corporate elites.

And now we get to the "C" word: conspiracy. It is my belief that corporate monopolists like John D. Rockefeller, Henry Morgan, the Du Ponts, the Vanderbilts and other infamous "robber barons" here and in Europe (where it all began with the Rothchilds and English royalty) actually created and maintained communism in the Soviet Union.

At work is what is known as the "Hegelian Principle." There are three parts to this technique. First you create the thesis. This is usually a problem that is created by government meddling. The thesis in this case was naked monopolistic capitalism, the bared fang, no-holds-barred type that John D. Rockefeller wielded. The masses get rather angry at some point. They don't like the big boys taking over the whole block.

So, now you create the solution to the problem that you had created earlier. This solution is called the anti-thesis. You finance a twisted megalomaniac by the name of Lenin to cook up a political dogma (based upon the ideas of Karl Marx...who was funded by European industrialists) that attacks your thesis and offers something as bad or worse in its place. (Sorry, but Comrade Lenin was worse than John D. Rockefeller.) After awhile, the masses reject the anti-thesis. You have the so-called "fall" of communism.

But what is left? It is called the synthesis. What remains is what you planned for in the first place: world-wide socialism!

Bingo! And here it is. Today not one nation in the entire world has a free market economy. Not a single one. Not a single nation has gold- and silver-backed currency. Not a single nation is allowed to withdraw into its national boundaries and make its way as a free market isolationist entity. Das Korporation uber alles, ladies and gentlemen!

People this cannot have just happened by accident. That is why I call it a conspiracy. That is why I firmly proclaim that socialism is actually corporate monopolism unmasked. It has never been anything else. The mask has just slipped and you can now see behind it for yourself anytime you care to look. And the elitist sons of bitches don't care if you now know! They think it's too late for you to do anything about it.

This isn't good news. It means the return of a feudal system to the entire globe. It pretends to be the illuminated New World Order, but it will be a New Dark Age unlike anything mankind has ever known. That is...unless we stop it.
[c] Attempting to force every product to have a federal license again as detailed above, is an affront to the very essences of our British Rule of Common Law, Constitutional Democracy and is simply not acceptable in the Natural Health Product Regulations, Bills C-51 and C-52 and / or any other federal legislation and / or regulation,
 
[d] The entire premise that the 1920 and 1927 amendments to the then Adulteration and Fraud attempted to create was premised on the competitive threat of the emerging ?Orthomolecular Holistic Health Care Approach? and the ridiculous concept that so how or another the only ?REAL AND COMPETENT? medical practitioner was an ?Allopathic / Medical Doctor? that that for anyone else including Homeopaths, Chiropractors, Herbalists, Naturopaths, Nutritionists, etc. to claim that most chronic diseases could potentially be prevent, treated and even in some cases cured was viewed and still is as a criminal heresy that justifies criminal conviction and long jail sentences, which still happens to this day. It is called ?Statism? politely, and not so politely ?Fascist Socialism?.
 
The entire concept that ?Healthy Foods? are grouped for federal criminal control of adulteration and fraud causing death with deadly ?Poisons? such as ?Prescription Drugs? never made any sense except to BIG PHARMA AND THEIR INVESTMEBNT ALLIES, never will.
 
Let us deal with the reality of the 800 pound Gorilla in our Parliaments and Senate and government bureaucracy.
 
HEALTH CANADA ACTUALLY WORKS MORE FOR BIG PHARMA AND THEIR INVESTMENT ALLIES THAN FOR THE PEOPLE OF CANADA WHO PAY THEM.
 
THERE IS MASSIVE CORRUPTION NOT ONLY IN CANADA, BUT IN OTHER COUNTRIES AS WELL ? SEE EXHIBIT?
 
[e] The 1934 censorship amendment was totally prompted by the Allopathic / Medical Doctor and their financial allies, as is the Natural Health Product Regulations, Bills C-51 and C-52. The Constitution section 2 is quite clear about the ancient British fundament right of ?Freedom of Expression?. The case law is also  quite clear, IF a human being has thoroughly researched the effectiveness of a product and it is reasonably based upon proper ?Due Diligence? to believe what is being claimed is true, there cannot be any lawful censorship and / or ability to convict a human being of Fraud and or and other criminal offense.
 
The issues in [d] and [e] where both thoroughly addressed in the 37th and 38^th Parliaments with Drs. James Lunney?s and Carrie?s Private Member?s Bill C-420.Bill C-420 was trying to fix these two problems that were created in amendments made to the ?Adulteration and Fraud Act? in 1920 and 1927 and in 1934.
 
The PHARMACARTEL created these amendments in 1920, 1927 and 1934 and renamed the Act then, for the very same reasons that BIG PHARMA is attempting to pass Bill C-51 now and it has very little to do with ?Protecting the Public?.
 
The definition line in a criminal federal police operation is critical to our freedoms. Our Fundamental British Natural Justice / God?s Laws / Natural Law / Fundamental Justice requires in all criminal matters, wherein Bill C-420, had it passed would have corrected and clarified this problem in a manner consistent not only with our country?s Rule of Law and Constitution, but also with the USA who solved this problem by passing the ?Dietary Supplements Health Education Act [DSHEA] in 1994.
 
Bills C-51 and C-52 are draconian, unconstitutional and against public interest. This legislation will only make these Freedom of Choice issues worse and not be in our best interests with our largest trading partner.
 
The second issue that Bill C-420 addressed was the admitted constitutionally unenforceable 1934 censorship provisions which attempted to create a criminal offence against anyone telling the truth about how any ?Therapeutic Product? successfully prevented, treated and / or cured any Schedule A disease. It is still in the current Act under sections 3.1 and 3.2.
 
Understanding this constitutional issue will help you understand why Bills C-51 and C-52 are constitutionally repugnant.
 
Point # 7
 
The Natural Health Product Regulations, Bills C-51 and C-52 issues have clearly highlighted to millions of concerned Canadian voters how terribly ?Broken? our British Rule of Common Law, Constitutional Democratic Institutes are.
 
Every Member of Parliament needs to be fully accountable to their ?BOSS? who hires them, being their local constituents.
 
Every Member of Parliament needs to take the time to professionally do their duty to their constituents, which is the have read the 1985 existing Food and Drugs Act, and the 1884 Parent originating Act, prior to designing, submitting and voting on Bills C-51 and C-52.
 
Every Member of Parliament owes a duty not only to their Constituents, but to all citizens of Canada to deal with properly operating the Federal Standing Committee on Health and the Joint Committee for Scrutiny of Regulations on these important ?FREEDOM OF CHOICE ISSUES?.
 
How can the out of jurisdiction, unlawful and against Public Interest ?Natural Health Regulations? after over 4 years of written submissions, meetings with Chairs, co-chairs and members of these two Committees, the Health Canada misconduct issues are still being ignored and not on public record investigated 13 years later and 4 years later on the Natural Health Product Regulations issues?
 
Today, Health Canada still does not acknowledge that its sole existing legislative authority is to protect the public from dangerous and deadly adulterations and fraud from drugs, which the public views as prescription drugs and over the counter drugs most of which are synthetic and not sourced from natural plant and animal kingdom.
 
Everyone who wants to understand these issues must read the 1884 Adulteration and Fraud Act and the updated version called the Food and Drugs Act, 1985.
 
Health Canada is solely under section 91 [27] which is the only head of federal jurisdiction that Health Canada and the federal Parliament can claim valid constitutional / Rule of Law jurisdiction under a federal criminal police force.
 
This means that any criminal investigation and / or charges and / or trial must follow the Rule of Law, Implied Bill of Rights, Written and Unwritten Constitution appropriate for criminal law environments.
 
Bill C-51 is specifically designed to unlawfully alter these Fundamental and unalienable rights, freedoms, liberties and safeguards of protection of property, trade and commerce, Substantive Due Process and protection of security of individual human beings that have been mandatory in criminal justice for over  a thousand years.
 
We will give you several examples of what we mean. In criminal drug charge matters, extensive case law has established a well known definition of ?sell? which is:
 
??sell? includes offer for sale, expose for sale, have in possession for sale and distribute, whether or not the distribution is made for consideration.?
 
If Bill C-51 was passed, for the first time in Canada tens of thousands of Canadians including most parents trying to look after their parents would instantly become criminals as the new definition of ?sell? is?
 
??sell? includes offer for sale, expose for sale or have in possession for sale or distribute to one or more persons, whether or not the distribution is made for consideration and in relation to a device, includes lease, offer for lease, expose for lease or have in possession for lease.?
 
The dangerous part of the unprecedented change is interesting -- the expression if you distribute to ?one or more persons? you can be criminally prosecuted for selling under the Act.  The old definition would normally only be applicable to commercial ventures.
 
Under the proposed changes, if Bill C-51 became criminal law, a parent giving herbs, vitamins, minerals, and almost any ?Healthy Nutrient-rich naturally occurring plant food? is ?selling? items that the already out-of-control Health Canada could deem as an unauthorized ?Therapeutic product? that is a ?Drug? and equivalent to heroin, cocaine, prescription synthetic drugs and these points are only a few of the dozens.
 
 
Point # 8
 
Small business is the core of the Canadian economy and as identified in the Canadian Federation of Independent Business as one of the gravest threats to the survival of small family businesses, is regulations. The mess involving the line between the definition of Food and Drug and the issues with 3.1 and 3.2 and schedule A and the issues of recall, seizure, etc. have destroyed hundreds of small family businesses especially with the attempt to force against public interest, unlawful Natural Health Product Regulations onto all Canadian retailers, practitioners, distributors, importers, manufacturers, etc.
 
The industry generally supported the Natural Health Product Regulations believing that the new federal regulatory scheme would provide a stable, affordable marketplace, where all sizes of businesses would prosper.
 
This has turned out not to be true and the new Bill C-51 legislative changes are only going to make more small family enterprises fail and or become marginal financially.
 
The dismal failure of the implementation of the Natural Health Product Regulations clearly identifies these issues.
 
 
Point # 9
 
 
It has always been accepted that food, health, civil and property rights and professions are under the exclusive jurisdiction of the Provinces. Bill C-51 if passed would permanently alter this fundamental division of jurisdiction and the entire relationships of individual businesses in every sector and type of food, healthcare, etc.
 
Another example is the new definition of ?controlled activity?;
 
(a)                in relation to a therapeutic product manufacturing, collecting, processing, preserving, labeling, packaging, importing for sale, distributing, wholesaling or testing, and
(b)               in relation to a designated therapeutic product manufacturing collecting, processing, preserving, labeling, packaging, importing, distributing or testing.
 
This brings Health Canada bureaucrats who are already totally out of control without any safeguards into millions of citizens? lives and tens of thousands of businesses of all sizes and literally created a ?Hitler / Stalin Style Fascist / Socialistic Police State? where all power is discretionarily vested in the federal bureaucracy.
 
The Constitutional and jurisdictional implications are enormous and will fundamentally change our entire society is a manner that is so horrifying to comprehend that it begs the question how could the Natural Health Product Regulations, Bills C-51 and C-52 ever be seriously proposed in a properly functioning British Rule of Common Law, Constitutional Democratic Society to begin with?.
 
Bill C-51 grants Health Canada bureaucrats complete control over not only ?Therapeutic Products?, but also all trade and commerce activities in the entire nation!
 
Bill C-51 states:
 
?13. No person shall conduct a controlled activity unless they are authorized by an establishment license to do so.?
 
This even expands the Natural Health Product to a broader mandate and by adding processing and preserving, it is apparent BIG PHARMA, the PCO and Health Canada bureaucrats and the SPP Directorates have more sinister plans that are yet to be fully revealed.
 
Point # 10
 
One of the reasons that parts of the Natural Health Care Industry accepted the Natural Health Products Regulations was the understanding that international agreements such as CODEX would not apply to dietary supplements in Canada if the traditional legislative classification was changed from food to a new novel regulatory sub-class of drugs called ?Natural Health Products Regulations?.
 
If the National Health Product Regulations and Bills C-51 and C-52 are not all three cancelled immediately, any international law, rule, regulation, trade agreement, treaty, protocol can become applicable to all and any parts of Canada without Rule of Law power of challenge, constitutional Substantive Due Process, Parliamentary Review and Approval.
 
The horrors of Mexican state police law will be visited on Canadians as exhibited in the Brenda Martin case.
 
If Bills C-51and C-52 are passed, all Canadian confidential information becomes potentially available to foreign governments and their agencies including the CIA, FBI, FDA and any other similar entity in the other 190 plus countries in the world.
 
Bill C-51 includes the following definitions:
??government? means any of the following or their institutions, as applicable:
(a)                the federal government;
(b)               a corporation named in Schedule III to 10 of the Financial Administration Act,
(c)                a provincial government or a public body established under an Act of the legislature of a province,
(d)               an aboriginal government as defined in subsection 13(3) of the Access to Information Act,
(e)                a government of a foreign state or of a subdivision of a foreign state, or
(f)                 an international organization of states.
 
Bill C-51 adds the following to the regulation making power of the federal government:
 
?30(7) A regulation may incorporate by reference documents produced by a person or body other than the Minister of the Canadian Food Inspection Agency including
(a)        an organization established for the purpose of writing standards, including an organization accredited by the Standards Council of Canada;
(b)        an industrial or trade organization; or
(c)        a government.?
 
This means that by simply passing a regulation that a CODEX treaty could be forced onto Canadians.
 
 
Point # 11
 
Bills C-51 and C-52 and all propaganda being distributed presupposes that the Drug Subclass Natural Health Product Regulations are;
 
[1] In federal jurisdiction,
 
[2] Are lawful,
 
[3] In Public Interest,
 
[4] Are staying in place
 
[5] And can be enforced by the full force of the federal government using threat and actual criminal charge convictions against tens of thousands of defiant small family enterprises.
 
ALL OF YOU NEED IMMEDIATELY TO RESEARCH THE FOLLOWING CASES;
 
[a] Bader
 
[b] Strauss Herb Company
 
[c] Biomedica
 
[d] BIE Health Products
 
[e] Freedom of Choice in Health Care
 
[f] Alliance of Natural Health Suppliers
 
[g] Synergy / Truehope
 
[h] Bell Lifestyle
 
[i] Trueman Tuck
 
Even the all powerful federal government is not going to be able to continue this ?OUR HEALTHY FOODS MUST BE DRUGS AND WE KNOW BETTER THAN YOU WHAT YOU SHOULD BE DOING WITH YOUR BODY? NONSENSE ANY LONGER.
 
The entire ?white list? concept is illegal and outside federal jurisdiction and the various sections the Natural Health Product Regulations and Bills C-51 and C-52 are an abomination including those designed to prevent importation from other countries and the shipping across provincial borders without Health Canada bureaucrats? permission, which is a fundamental protected right in the Constitutional Act 1982.
 
Health Canada bureaucrats also want the power to determine who can be in business, what products you can carry and who your customers will be.
 
 
Point # 12
 
Health Canada bureaucrats are given extended non Court supervised extreme criminal investigative police powers that are not available to any other criminal police powers without all of the Rule of Law, Constitutional and Democratic safeguards, including published administrative review process and Internal Affairs Process.
 
THERE IS NO LEGISLATIVE PROVISION FOR AN OMBUDSMAN AND INTERNAL POLICE STYLE AFFAIRS COMPLAINT PROCESS.
 
Why is that?
 
The Natural Health Products? last four and a half year ?Report Card? on Health Canada?s total incompetence, biased and prejudiced activities against the Natural Health Products Industry which is predominately small family enterprises, speaks for itself.
 
HEALTH CANADA IS THE NUMBER ONE CAUSE OF DEATHS IN CANADA AND THE CLOSURE AND / OR FINANCIAL MARGINATION OF THOUSANDS OF SMALL FAMILY ENTERPRISES.
 
HEALTH CANADA IS NOT RESPECTED OR TRUSTED AND NEEDS TO BE FULLY INVESTIGATED FOR IT?S OVER 25 YEARS OF ?GESTOPA LIKE ATTACKS ON CONSUMERS? RIGHTS OF CHOICE AND SMALL FAMILY ENTPRISES!
 
If the Natural Health Product Regulations and Bills C-51 and C-52 are passed the financial destruction that will occur is almost beyond belief. The fines and penalties will destroy any small family business that Health Canada goes after as they have been doing with complete immunity for decades.
 
Bills C-51 and C-52 are also planning on piercing the corporate veil and holding Directors and officers of corporations personally responsible without proper Substantive Due process before a jury.
 
Point # 13
 
The very fact that the Liberal unlawful Natural Health Product Regulations are still in place four and a half years later and that the Conservatives introduced Bills C-51 and C-52, cries out for the need for the following accountability reforms to be implemented immediately;
 
[1] Constituents ?Hire? their MP and need to be able to ?Fire? their MP. We need a recall system.
 
[2] Citizens pay for Senators and need to be able to ?Hire? and ?Fire? Senators. There must be limited terms and proper elections and recall immediately.
 
The Canadian system is designed to have ?Safeguards? ? in theory the ?CROWN, Senate, Parliament, Judiciary. None of these safeguards are functioning any more due solely to the ?Absolute? Concentration of totally arbitrary power in the Prime Minister and his office and staff.
   [3] You need to understand ?De Facto? and ?De Jure? and change our system into a ?Republic? instead of a so-called ?Democracy? that is ?De Facto? a ?Dictatorship? now ruled by the ?De Facto? ?King of Canada? ? the not so Honourable Stephen Harper.
 
Think about it for a few minutes; who decide the following;
 
[a] who will be the Governor-General?
 
[b] Who will be on the Supreme Court?
 
[c] Who will be not only the federal Court Judges, but the Provincial Superior Court Judges in most Provinces and Territories?
 
[d] Who will be appointed to over 5,000 key positions controlling almost every military, police, court, etc. activity in Canada?
 
[e] Who will control all entry nominations in every riding in the country for his party?s candidates for election as MP? 
 
[f] Who controls all legislative and regulatory agendas?
 
[g] Who controls federal spending?
 
And on and on,
 
We need to elect our own President and limit terms to two similar to the US model,
 
[4] We need to change the Supreme Court to have 13 Judges, one from each Province and territory and to be directly elected by the People.
 
[5] We need to change how judges are elected; the leading two parties in each of the 15 assemblies / senates / Parliaments in Canada should appoint an elected official to form the Judicial Assembly of Canada and on public record hearings should occur to appoint all Justices of the Peace, Tribunal Arbiters and Judges in this country.
 
[6] We need electoral reform to set democratic nomination guidelines, including a minimum of 3 years residency in any riding to be eligible for nomination and membership in the local riding association at least a year prior to the nominating meeting and every member of the local riding association is eligible for nomination and the central party / leader cannot cull and sort who they want any more.
 
The Party leader?s veto of nominees must be illegal. 
 
To unsubscribe: chrisgupta@alumni.uwaterloo.ca?subject=unsubscribe
To subscribe:  chrisgupta@alumni.uwaterloo.ca?subject=subscribe
List information is at: http://tinyurl.com/2xohw
ARCHIVES: http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/chris/archives.htm
Share The Wealth: http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/chris/
Communication Agents: http://www.communicationagents.com/

---