Jim Stone: The 'Groundbreaking' Fukushima Whistleblower is Now "The Fugitive," Running for His Life by Ken Adachi (March 3, 2012)

Educate-Yourself
The Freedom of Knowledge, The Power of Thought ©

Jim Stone: The 'Groundbreaking' Fukushima Whistleblower is Now "The Fugitive," Running for His Life

[Addendum: March 6, 2012. I received an e-mail today from Henry Makow in which he said that it was he, Henry Makow, who added the photo of actor David Jenssen, and the allusion to "The Fugitive" story, in The Real Deal article from James Farganne which I criticize below, and not James Farganne himself. Since it was Henry making the comparison and not Farganne, I withdraw my statement linking the comparison to "The Fugitive" as coming from James Farganne. Henry also told me that he believes Jim Stone and James Farganne are legit (an impression I obviously do not share)...Ken Adachi]

From Ken Adachi, Editor
http://educate-yourself.org/cn/jimstonethefugitivehero03mar12.shtml
March 3, 2012

Yesterday, I received an e-mail from Henry Makow with a link to James Farganne's latest homage to Jim Stone, titled,

Jim Stone is The Real Deal
http://www.henrymakow.com/jim_stone_is_the_real_thing.html

DAvid Jansenn as "The Fugitive" This is the caption that Henry Makow [corrected, Mar. 6, 2012] has placed next to this photo of actor David Janssen in the above linked article:

"(left. David Janssen in "The Fugitive." We do not have Jim Stone's real name and pic. He is on the run.)"

Ironically, the essence of the thesis presented here, is largely captured in that simple three sentence caption.

Just how "real" Jim Stone and James Farganne are will be the subject of this paper. I'll review the contents of James Farganne's Real Deal article and Jim Stone's recent "Fugitive" status further below. There are so many red flags surrounding the sudden appearance of Jim Stone, Freelance Journalist, on May 28, 2011 with his Fukushima 'report', and the dramatic plight in which he now finds himself (we are told) of having to run for his life, that the intelligent reader needs to exercise caution and not become so engrossed with the high drama being presented that we lose sight of the fact that we know absolutely nothing about the true identity, appearance, family history, ethnicity, nationality, education, training, and government/ military affiliations of a mystery person who has adopted the pseudonym of "Jim Stone"- other than what he and "James Farganne" choose to tells us.

To review a bit, I had sent an e-mail to Henry Makow on Jan. 28, 2012 expressing my objection to James Farganne's inference that Jim Stone, a previously unknown 'Freelance Journalist,' had single handedly uncovered The Crime of the Century: the Fukushima sabotage story and faux earthquake events that occurred on March 11, 2011 in the region of northern Japan.

My comments to Henry and James Farganne's response to my comments are posted at this link:

http://educate-yourself.org/cn/kenadachiletterpostedatmakow28jan12comments.shtml

Here's the first James Farganne article about Jim Stone posted at Henry's site that got the ball rolling with me, and also resulted in the rift with Jeff Rense (and later with David Icke):

The Argument that Fukushima Was Sabotaged (Janary 27, 2012)
http://www.henrymakow.com/theargumentfukushimasabotage.html

In James Farganne's second article posted at Henry's web site, dated Feb. 1, 2012,

Fukushima - What Really Happened
http://www.henrymakow.com/fukushima_-_what_really_happen.html

he states that: "Stone's report proves definitively that the official story of 3/11, like that of 9/11, is a poorly woven fabric of lies and inconsistencies." Again, James Farganne wants the reader to know that it was his boy, Jim Stone, who "definitively" proved that 3/11 was a hoaxed, artificially induced event. There's a reason, I believe, why James Farganne is acting as a publicist and promoter for Jim Stone's groundbreaking articles. It's more than possible that Farganne is part of a psyops tag team to popularize and create an expanding readership for an intel-created hero called "Jim Stone, Freelance Journalist."

Please note that my quarrel is not with the photographic and seismographic evidence which Stone presents in his Fukushima articles (except perhaps for the emphasis on Israel as the sole culprit), since Fukushima was a sabotage operation, but rather the attempt to frame Jim Stone as the ex-NSA "brainiac" (Farganne's description) reporter/hero who blew the lid off The Hoax of the Century and is now running for his life because the Mossad, China's DoD, Russia's DoD, and the Pentagon can't let a "whistle blower" of his investigative brilliance run around the country loose and possibly expose other looming, ticking bomb, Fukushima style set-ups or "dangers' that are brewing in nuclear power plants across the nation. In other words, Jim 'knows' too much and is too sharp of an investigative cyclone for The Powers That Be to take a chance on, so they have to 'take him out' before he exposes other bombshells (if this sounds like a TV movie script, it IS).

In the Beginning

I never heard of or read anything by Jim Stone until I was sent his May 28, 2011 Fukushima article (updated on May 30) which I posted (as seen below) on my Current News page on June 1, 2011,

Fukushima: Did the Dimona Dozen Murder the Fukushima 50? (June 1, 2011) (At last, another voice)
http://educate-yourself.org/cn/stonefukushima30may11.shtml

and where I wrote the following introductory comments at the top of his article:

"[Editor's Note: I re-post this May 28 article by Jim Stone because it corroborates and confirms (with additional evidence) the main elements of the March 11, 2011 Japan earthquake/tsunami sabotage events which were plainly stated at this web site on March 12, 2011 in an article I wrote titled, Japan's 3/11/11 Mega 9.1 Earthquake: Another Illuminati Production? and again on March 14, 2011 in which ZS Livingstone confirmed that planted nuclear devices were responsible for the Daiichi explosions and not hydrogen gas. The third element of the Japan sabotage package is the overbearing radiation scare psyops, which is not mentioned here, but maybe Jim will break that story in a month or two as well. I welcome his efforts to get out the truth about the attack on Japan on 3/11/11. . ..Ken Adachi]"

The tongue in cheek reference to Jim possibly "breaking" The Japan Radiation psyops (as well, in a few months) is a reflection of the annoyance I felt at the time by the tone of Jim's article which would lead a new reader to believe that Jim Stone had broken the Fukushima sabotage/faux earthquakes/faux tsunami 3/11 Japan story, when the fact remains that the entire story was broken at educate-yourself.org 2 ½ months before Stone had sent his article out to dozens, if not hundreds, of internet blogs. The idea was to link the name of Jim Stone-- and only Jim Stone-- as the 'journalist' who blew the lid off the Fukushima sabotage/faux earthquake/faux tsunami story and thus grow a hitherto non-existent readership by impressing people like Henry Makow, Natural News, etc., that it was he, Jim Stone, who had originated the Fukushima sabotage story. By using his Fukushima "Report," he could then launch a publicity campaign to shape the character of "Jim Stone" into this honest, courageous and brilliant "journalist' who quickly finds himself run afoul of the International Big Boys and now has to run for his life, with Mossad, Pentagon, Chinese, and Russian assassins in hot pursuit--which is precisely the story line presented in Farganne's latest Real Deal installment of Jim Stone, Hero Reporter on The Run.

What started out for me as a vague suspicion concerning the validity and legitimacy of the "Freelance Journalist" Jim Stone, has now grown into a ripening belief that "Jim Stone" is an intelligence operation; a psyops designed to create the impression of the hero-reporter on the run for his life because he's too 'dangerous' to be allowed to live. Naturally, you gain credibility (and readers) by producing hard hitting articles that make for fascinating reading, employing captivating photographs and documents (often reported as 'classified') that no one else seems to be abe to get their hands on (except the 'brainiac' Jim Stone). Now that Jim's running for his life to escape assassins from within the United States, he will undoubtedly relocate abroad and perch from some mysterious safe-haven overseas (Saudi Arabia perhaps?) to continue regaling us with his hard hitting exposes.

What's in a Name?

Jim Stone, the "Journalist'.

If someone describes himself as a "Freelance Journalist" in large size 30 font letters in the logo graphic of his web site, doesn't that imply that the person is engaged in the profession of journalism? Don't "freelance journalists" write articles and have them published in various newspapers, journals, magazines, or internet outlets that are recognized as legitimate publishing outlets? And wouldn't there be a track record of their published articles? If someone wrote a Letter to the Editor of the local newspaper, would we consider that writer a "journalist?" How about people who send reader comments or e-mail letters to Henry Makow, or David Icke, or Ken Adachi, or post their comments to a blog, are they considered "journalists?"

How about a guy who puts up a web site describing himself as an amateur photographer and then - from 2008 until at least Feb.7 of 2011, ONLY talks about the merits of this or that digital camera on the home page of that web site, along with a large number of his own photographs and a sprinkling of short articles describing the subjects seen in his photos, is he a "journalist" or is he a digital photography enthusiast who's commenting about a hobby he enjoys?

If that same person were to write a SINGLE article related to the Swine Flu 'pandemic' hoax of 2009, dated August 10, 2009, composed of exactly TWO pages, supposedly co-written with his wife, "Dr. Sarah Stone", Doctor of Pharmacology, and even an Editor, Russ Clarke (of a TWO PAGE article no less) and sent that article to numerous internet blogs in October of 2009, including blogs written in Arabic, but DIDN'T post that same article on his own web site in 2009, would that person qualify as a "journalist?"

When I sent my initial comments to Henry Makow on Jan. 28, 2012 objecting that Stone was trying to take credit for an important story that I had already broken on March 12, 2011 and could rightfully claim an exclusive on, I mentioned that no one ever heard of "Jim Stone" before he published his May 28, 2011 Fukushima article. My comments can be seen here,

http://www.henrymakow.com/theargumentfukushimasabotage.html (under the Comments section at the bottom of the page)

and here:
http://educate-yourself.org/cn/kenadachiletterpostedatmakow28jan12comments.shtml (re-posted at my web site)

[Ken Adachi writing]
"No one ever heard of (or read anything by) "freelance reporter" Jim Stone before he "broke" the Japan nuke/faux earthquake story with his May 28, 2011 article. Now that I know of his NASA affiliation, I have greater suspicions as to WHY he didn't mention my web site or my March 12 article in his write up."

Immediately, publicist and interference runner James Farganne was quick to retort on Henry's web site that Stone had indeed already published material on the internet and he pointed to this ONE article titled "Tainted nightmare" as evidence that Jim Stone was a published journalist. Here's his reply:

"As for your assertion that he never published anything before his Fukushima report, simply search "Tainted Nightmare" at Google:

https://www.google.com/search?q=tainted+nightmare&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a"

The first thing I found odd is that James Farganne pointed to a Google search page listing the article, rather than the ORGINAL source article link itself which I would assume had been posted to Jim Stone's web site in 2009. But after searching through the Wayback Machine (archive.org) internet archives and reviewing the web pages crawled at Jim Stone's web site in 2007 (no data posted), 2008, 2009, 2010, and 2011, I found that Jim did not post the "Tainted nightmare" article at his web site in 2009, but rather distributed the article to numerous blog sites without including a source link for his two page article (further below, I'll re-post comments from one blogger in 2009 who noticed the absence of the article source link and other oddities about the "Tainted nightmare" article).

The very top article link on the Google search page seen above provided by Farganne is a link to the 'Tainted nightmare' article which is now posted at Jim Stone's web site at,

http://www.jimstonefreelance.com/squalene.html

but it wasn't posted on his web site in 2009.

How do I know?

Because the Wayback Machine archived pages revealed the SAME digital camera article posted at Jim's site in 2008, 2009, 2010, and continued to show the same digital camera article on the home page, along with the "Freelance Photographer" logo when his web site was archived on Feb. 7, 2011. That means that Jim Stone was using his web site domain as a parking lot until he was ready to make his debut as "Jim Stone, Freelance Journalist" in the late Spring of 2011 when he first posted his Fukushima sabotage article on May 28, 2011. Since that date, Jim has written a number of articles which are now posted on his home page, along with prominent links to Henry Makow, Natural News, and What Really Happened.com. As of today, March 3, 2012, I count 15 different articles posted on his home page, along with 3 "Upcoming articles." His latest article, "The report that destroyed my music career" is a real shocker, reporting on the brutal massacre by Israelis of thousands of Palestinians in the town of Jenin. It's heavy duty stuff, with shocking photos, and makes for compelling reading. I'm sure this article will only serve to further boost the reputation of Jim Stone, the new guy in town who seems to get the story (and the documents, and the photos) that no one else seems to be able to acquire.

Wayback Machine archived pages for jimstaonefreelance.com from 2007-2011:

You will see from the alexa.com internet activity ranking graph shown further below, that Jim's web site got very little traffic until he posted his Fukushima article on May 28, 2011. He essentially launched his "journalist" career with that article. Prior to that date, we only see a single article talking about the merits of a certain digital camera and talk about his photographs. This sole article remained on his home page from 2008 until after Feb. 7, 2011. He then changed his logo to read Freelance "Journalist" from its former title of Freelance Photographer and started to post additional articles.

2007 (no pages displayed from crawl, no data posted)

2008 Jim Stone 12 month web site index
http://wayback.archive.org/web/20080601000000*/http://jimstonefreelance.com

Only one crawl made on March 28 2008 for the entire 12 month period:
http://web.archive.org/web/20080328090847/http://www.jimstonefreelance.com/

2009 Jim Stone 12 month web site index
http://wayback.archive.org/web/20090601000000*/http://jimstonefreelance.com

Only one crawl made on March 26 2009 for the entire 12 month period: http://web.archive.org/web/20090326144119/http://www.jimstonefreelance.com/

2010 Jim Stone 12 month web site index
http://wayback.archive.org/web/20100515000000*/http://jimstonefreelance.com

Only one crawl made on Oct 9 2010 for the entire 12 month period
http://web.archive.org/web/20101009094809/http://www.jimstonefreelance.com/

2011 Jim Stone 12 month web site index
http://wayback.archive.org/web/20110615000000*/http://jimstonefreelance.com

There were three dates crawled in 2011 at Jim's site: Feb. 7, July 17, and July 23. The link below shows the Feb 7, 2011 crawl with the same digital camera article and the same Freelance Photographer logo being displayed. Therefore, Jim did not adopt the title of "Freelance Journalist" on his logo until after Feb. 7, 2011 (the significance of this will be explained further on in this paper).
http://web.archive.org/web/20110207160840/http://jimstonefreelance.com/

2012 (there are no Wayback Machine crawls for 2012 so far)

I can only guess that the Wayback Machine only posted one archived date in each of the years 2008, 2009, and 2010 because the web crawler could not detect any CHANGES in the contents of the digital camera article posted on Jim's home page from 2008 up to (and including) Feb. 7, 2011. .

(My web site was crawled by the Wayback Machine on May 10, 2011, the closest date available which was archived after the Japan event of March 11 2011. You can see the many articles posted in the original chronological order my Current News page that address the Japan sabotage/radiation story, as well as the radio shows tht I did with Don Nicoloff in March and April of 2011.

http://web.archive.org/web/20110511100631/http://educate-yourself.org/cn/index.shtml )

The Phenomenal "Tainted nightmare" Article of 2009

There is a self congratulatory "History of this article" paragraph posted at the top of the Tainted nightmare article which tell us some truly amazing things:

From http://www.jimstonefreelance.com/squalene.html

" This article was an ambush, and took off like crazy. It got translated to many different languages and ended up getting 300 million reads. It got the Elite's attention, which could be why they snuffed the Fukushima article so fast. Tainted nightmare rose such a stir in the Muslim world that the President of Egypt made an official statement regarding the article - "there must be a reason why they are having you sign an agreement not to sue once you take it" and at least one major medical organization in the Middle East issued it as their formal position. This article forced a reformulation of the swine flu vaccine to a non damaging mix. At its peak, it shut out the first 4,500 hits on google, it was THAT widely distributed. I saved the google results only after it had been whittled down to the first 1,800 hits (total shutout) a year later. Read on to see why it went wild."

There is no name appended to this paragraph, but one has to assume that it's either Jim Stone or James Farganne who posted this commentary since it's written in the first person. Amazingly, it includes the sort of extreme hyperbole and gross exaggerations that prompted my suspicions about the reliability of James Farganne and "Jim Stone" in the first place. Read what's being claimed here!

A) "and ended up getting 300 million reads."

How could Jim Stone or James Farganne possibly know how many "reads" this article had when the article was ONLY posted on internet blogs in 2009? The only way you can accurately check on how many "hits' an article receives is from your own web site server (which tells you how many hits an individual article receives), and since this article was NOT posted at jimstonefreelance.com in 2009, there's no way for Jim Stone or James Farganne to determine how many people read it.

B) "It got the Elite's attention, which could be why they snuffed the Fukushima article so fast. Tainted nightmare rose such a stir in the Muslim world that the President of Egypt made an official statement regarding the article - "there must be a reason why they are having you sign an agreement not to sue once you take it and at least one major medical organization in the Middle East issued it as their formal position."

Good grief, I can't believe the chutzpa of this guy! He's actually claiming that Hosni Mubarak, the President of Egypt in 2009, issued an "official statement regarding the article." based on Jim Stone and "Dr Sarah Stone's" TWO PAGE "Tainted nightmare" article, a minor summary review of material that was researched and made public by others -such as Jane Bergermesister, Dr. A. True Ott, Gary Null, Bill Deagle, etc.- concerning the artificiality of the lab-created Swine/Bird flu virus itself, the Baxter lab tainted vaccine that was caught by a Czech lab before it could infect the Swine/Bird flu virus into millions of innocent people, and the dangers involved with the squalene adjutant which was added to that God awful Swine flu vaccine.

If Mubarak issued a "official statement" based on Jim Stone's article, then where is it? I'd like to read it myself and determine if Mubarak gives credit to Jim Stone as the impetus for issuing his official statement. Same goes for the "major medical organization in the Middle East." Let's see documentation of the "formal position" taken and let's see where they credit Jim Stone and Dr. Sarah Stone, "D-Pharm" for prompting that "position" based on their TWO PAGE summary. .

C) "This article forced a reformulation of the swine flu vaccine to a non damaging mix. "

Really? And where is the proof of such an astounding and astonishing claim? Which pharmaceutical company, exactly, reformulated their vaccine to a "non damaging mix" based on the information provided in Stone's TWO PAGE summary article and how do we know that Stone's article prompted that decision? (Inquiring minds want to know.)

D) 'At its peak, it shut out the first 4,500 hits on google, it was THAT widely distributed. I saved the google results only after it had been whittled down to the first 1,800 hits (total shutout) a year later"

Gee, what a pity. What a loss to humanity that he wasn't able to save the Google page while it was shutting out the "the first 4,500 hits on google"! Imagine the exposure bonanza that his name and reputation could have enjoyed had he managed to save proof of that Wild & Viral popularity of that TWO PAGE summary review article before the Bad Guys "whittled down to the first 1,800 hits (total shutout) a year later"

When you consider that educate-yourself.org had posted at LEAST 150 lengthy articles about the phony Swine flu 'pandemic' hoax in 2009, beginning in the third week of March 2009, when the announcement of the "outbreak" in Mexico City first hit the news services, and the plethora of well-researched and annotated articles found at other web sites which concentrated on exposing the Swine flu hoax, such as Jane Bergermeister's web site, which posted perhaps five hundred or more articles in 2009 concerning the Swine flu hoax, that the President of Egypt and "at least one major medical organization in the Middle East " should ONLY take notice of Stone's TWO PAGE summary review to make an "official statement" and embrace a new "position." Wow, the Power of Jim Stone and his keyboard wizardry.

Who's Who at jimstonefreelance.com

The jimstonefreelance.com web site was created on Jan. 15, 2007. A WhoIs search identified the registrant as:

James Smith
Palestine Street
Jeddah, -
Saudi Arabia
Phone: +966.530957259
Fax..:
Email:
Last modified: 2011-03-06 06:37:59 GMT

Interesting that the web site is registered to James "Smith" of Saudi Arabia, with the web site name presented as James Stone and promoted by James Farganne.

So how "real' is Jim Stone?

In the internet radio interview that Jim has posted to his web site, the host of the show mentions that "Jim Stone" is not his real name. In recent articles, James Farganne also mentions that Jim Stone is not a real name. If "Jim Stone" is a made up name, then isn't his "wife's" name, Dr Sarah Stone, with whom he collaborated with on the Tainted nightmare article, also made up? And is there any reason to think that the "Editor" of the Tainted article is not a pen name as well? How can we confirm that Jim's "wife", Dr. Sarah Stone, is actually a doctor of pharmacology if her name is as unreal as Jim's name? So how can we independently verify anything about Jim Stone or his wife, if we don't know who they are?

While we're at it, how do we know that "James Farganne" is a real name? Don Nicoloff entered his name into a few special data search bases that he uses to determine the alias names that some people might use, along with any public record or telephone or utility bill records, etc., that may exist in that name and he came up with ZERO. I entered the name of "James Farganne" into a Zaba Search (http://www.zabasearch.com) query and this is what came up:

"No Results Match JAMES FARGANNE
Check Your Spelling and Try Your Search Again"

Put your own name into the Zaba Search engine and see if NOTHING comes up.

Using Mainstream Media Ridicule to Bolter Credibility

If Jim Stone and James Farganne are, in fact, an intel tag team, then it's not unreasonable to assume that articles would be planted in mainstream publications to debunk and ridicule Jim's Fukushima article, for example, as the work of a "crackpot" in order to bolster his credibility and believability among young readers of alternative media, as well as exposing him to a wider mainstream audience, in order to further enhance his name recognition. And so it was that while reading through some of Jim's recent writing, Jim mentioned how he was recently criticized in an article posted on January 31, 2012 in Wired magazine and he linked to it. Apparently, Jim wanted people to read it, otherwise he wouldn't have mentioned it or linked to it.

The article was titled: Israeli Nukes Triggered Fukushima Quake, Crackpot Claims (http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2012/01/jim-stone-fukushima/) By Katie Drummond.

In the article, Katie derides and mocks Jim Stone as a "crackpot" whose idea that Fukushima was a Israeli sabotage operation was as nutty as other crazy "crackpot" ideas which have surfaced in recent years such as the Haiti "earthquake" being artificially induced (it was a nuke explosion actually) or the 2004 Sumatra tsunami was artificially induced (also an undersea nuke), or that Hurricane Katrina was artificially created and steered into New Orleans in 2005. These are the examples she uses to ridicule Stone's Fukushima article, but in reality most people are aware ( or at least suspicious) that the Haiti "quake" and the Sumatra tsunami, and Hurricane Katrina were if fact government black operations, so they come away from the article with even greater credibility and faith in Jim Stone's fabulous investigative reportage.

I can't think of any faster bullet train to gain instant name recognition than to have your ideas castigated in a main stream publications by characterizing you as a "crackpot." The alternative media readers will see you as the courageous hero-reporter trying to get out the real story, while the main stream Pajama People will become familiar with your name and perhaps come to realize that you were "right" all along, You win either way.

The Bottom Line

What doesn't hold water for me is the lack of a reasonable explanation from Farganne or Stone as to as WHY government assassins should be trying to hunt him down and upon WHAT basis could Jim Stone be taken to court over and face imprisonment for 15 years? Jim Stone and James Farganne try to imply that Jim's 'report' of the Fukushima sabotage story, along with the artificially induced faux earthquakes, and the undersea nuclear device that caused the so-called Japan "tsunami" of March 11 2011, was the thing that had so startled the Mossad and military honchos from China, Russia, and the Pentagon, that they were going to take him down for blowing the lid off their super secret black ops of March 11, 2011. But I had ALREADY exposed all significant facets of the Japan sabotage story on March 12, 2011. So why would they go after him for paraphrasing the same story that I had exposed, but posting it 2.5 months later?

I get a great deal more monthly traffic at educate-yoursself.org from roughly 170 countries than Jim Stone has ever seen at his web site. Since I posted at least 25 articles on the Japan sabotage story and covered the story on four radio shows with Don Nicoloff (March and April of 2011), before Jim Stone published his Fukushima article on May 28, 2011, then I think it's safe to conclude that the US intelligence agencies, the Pentagon, and military types from Israel, China, Russia, Japan, India, France, Britain, Germany, etc. etc. etc., had already read the Japan sabotage story at my web site.

The graph on the left side (below) shows the Daily Traffic Rank Trend for Jim Stone's web site displaying most of 2010, all of 2011, and up to present time in 2012. obtained from alexa.com . You'll notice the little blue blip seen at little less than the halfway point between 2011 and 2012 represents the bump in traffic that Jim got when he posted his May 28, 2011 Fukushima article. His ranking briefly entered the 80,000 ranking zone and then fell back below the 100,000 mark (the lower the number, the greater the traffic). The graph on the right shows my web site traffic trend superimposed over Jim's for the same time period. You'll notice that my average daily traffic ranking will fluctuate anywhere from roughly 58,000 to 45,000, depending on the articles I've posted and the interest that's generated by them. I reported in my Jan. 28, 2012 Letter to Henry Makow that I had 3.7 MILION hits at my web site in March of 2011, another 3.8 MILLION hits in April 2011, and 4.5 MILLION hits in May, 2011--before Jim posted his Fukushima report to the internet--which means that upwards of 1/2 million people monthly from around the world had read my 25+ Japan sabotage articles, including every major intelligence and military organization from here to Timbuktu.

So it was hardy news to TPTB that someone had already figured out that the Daiichi facility was pre-planted with mini nukes to cause the so-called hydrogen gas explosion, and that an undersea nuclear device had caused the sea surge which was called a "tsunami" by the media, and that the multiple, mid-size earthquakes that Japan was being pummeled with-before and after 3/11-were being artificially induced by space-based weapon platforms.

DAily Traffic Rank trend for Jim Stone web site

Compare graph E-Y to Jim Stone traffic ranking

You can see from this graph that Jim Stone's web site had almost no readership until he posted the Fukushima article on May 28, 2011. when his Daily Reach percentage suddenly spiked. This chart also confrims my statement to Henry Makow on Jan. 28, 2012 that nobody ever heard of or read anything by Jim Stone prior to his Fukushim article.

This begs the question: Why does "Jim Stone" suddenly come out of the woodwork on May 28, 2011? He writes well and has access to photos and documents (and interview subjects) that most of us are not privy to. How come we never heard of him before? With his talent, he should have a long list of published articles to point to in order to justify his claim of being a "journalist", yet James Farganne can only point to ONE article written with "Dr. Sarah Stone" in 2009.

Does that make sense to you?

I read on Jim's home page today that he had a number of other web sites -under different names- and had a lot of articles posted on them, but many of them had been wiped out except the jimstonefreelance.com web site. Now that may be a convenient cover story to account for his lack of archived material or it may be true. I have no way of knowing, but if it is true, and if he's such an honest guy, then why is he using so many different pseudonyms on so many different web sites?

And exactly when did he leave the National Security Agency as an "analyst" with an 'engineering' background? And why? How does he obtain money to live, especially since he went underground and is trying to avoid assassins.

Final Analysis

It's simply preposterous for Jim Stone and James Farganne to claim that Jim's May 28, 2011 Fukushima article has put him in such hot water with TPTB for "exposing" the Fukushima sabotage story, that he's now being hotly pursued by government assassins and has to flee the country in order to avoid being killed (as asserted in Farganne's Jim Stone is the Real Deal article). Jim Stone and James Farganne are presenting us with a movie script modeled on "The Fugitive" in order to ratchet up the drama and create intense interest in Jim's latest blockbuster "expose" (while dodging assassins, of course, and pulling off Jason Borne-style super human feats of escape in order to to relocate to a safe haven abroad {perhaps at the same villa in Saudi Arabia where James "Smith" is living})

The only other person to publicly embrace the three major elements of the Japan sabotage story-- within a few days of 3/11-- was Ben Fulford (who many falsely denigrate as some sort of NWO shill). If anyone was going to be hunted down and taken out by government assassins for "blowing the lid" off the sabotage events that took place in Japan on March 11, 2011 it would have been Fulford, myself, ZS Livingstone, Don Nicoloff, or Jim Murray since we were the individuals who were first out of the box to reveal the hoax and subterfuge that took place in Japan on March 11, 2011.

Ken Adachi

Related

Japan's 3/11/11 Mega 9.1 Earthquake: Another Illuminati Production? (Mar. 12, 2011) (note the date of posting)
http://educate-yourself.org/cn/japanquakemanufactured12mar11.shtml

Copyright 2012 educate-yourself.org All Rights Reserved

Free Newsletter

Join the Educate-Yourself Discussion Forum

All information posted on this web site is the opinion of the author and is provided for educational purposes only. It is not to be construed as medical advice. Only a licensed medical doctor can legally offer medical advice in the United States. Consult the healer of your choice for medical care and advice.