Profits, Not Science, Motivate Vaccine Mandates By Kristine M. Severyn, Ph.D (April 18, 2015)

Educate-Yourself
The Freedom of Knowledge, The Power of Thought ©

Profits, Not Science, Motivate Vaccine Mandates

[Editor's Note: This article was written 14 years ago, but it might as well have been written yesterday as the same Illuminated Big Pharma players use the same paid-off medical front men and sellout politicians to push for the same compulsory vaccination agenda in order to guarantee obsene profits while poisoning and microchipping (injectable RFID microchips 1, 2, 3 activated by human enzymes) humanity's future generations to meet radical, human depopulations goals spelled out by the Club of Rome in 1968. In 2001, two Ohio state Senators, Grace Drake and Bruce Johnson, greatly assisted in gaining political office with Big Pharma campaign contributions, introduced a mandatory vaccination bill, SB 254, which ultimately failed. Today in California, we have two newly elected Big Pharma state senator frontmen, Dr. Richard Pan and Benjamin Allen, playing the same roles as Drake and Johnson, in order to introduce a mandatory vaccination bill, SB 277, for the profit margins of Big Pharma, while the families of vaccine-damaged children pay the ultimate price.]

By Kristine M. Severyn, Ph.D., Well Being Journal, Spring 2001, Volume 10, #2
http://educate-yourself.org/cn/profits-not-science-motivate-vaccine-mandates2001.shtml#top
EY posted April 18, 2015

Profits, Not Science, Motivate Vaccine Mandates By Kristine M. Severyn, Ph.D (April 18, 2015)

The Lies and Hypocrisy of CA Senate Richard Pan (& SB277) Exposed (April 17, 2015)

https://www.wellbeingjournal.com/profits-not-science-motivate-vaccine-mandates/

The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), a group of individuals hand-picked by members of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), recommends which vaccines are administered to American children. Working mainly in secret, ACIP members frequently have financial links to vaccine manufacturers. Dependent on federal CDC funding, administrators of state vaccination programs follow CDC directives by influencing state legislators to mandate new vaccines. Federal vaccine funds can be denied to states that do not “vigorously enforce” mandatory vaccination laws.

Conversely, the CDC offers financial bounties to state departments of health for each “fully vaccinated” child. In a recent year, the Ohio Department of Health received $1 million in such CDC bonus payments.

At CDC national immunization conferences, Merck and other vaccine manufacturers wine and dine thousands of attendees who make their living promoting and administering vaccines.

Are physicians beholden?

The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), a major supporter of mandatory chicken pox and other vaccine mandates across the country, shares incestuous financial ties with Merck. When constructing its new headquarters in suburban Chicago, the AAP solicited funds from Merck, and received $100,000 for its building campaign.

Vaccines represent an economic boon for pediatricians. Profitable well-baby visits are timed to coincide with vaccination schedules established by the AAP and the CDC.

Traveling circus?

As a front for Merck’s campaign to enact a chicken pox vaccine mandate, the company established and bankrolled the Illinois Children’s Health Coalition. Upon investigation, this group was found to be no more than a public relations gimmick. Merck’s similar campaign moved to Ohio with the introduction of a senate bill (SB 254). The senator (Grace Drake, R-Solon) who presides over the committee (Health and Human Services) hearings for SB 254 accepted significant campaign contributions from Merck. (Sen. Drake, at the request of a Merck lobbyist, had sponsored a bill in the previous year to mandate hepatitis B vaccine for Ohio kindergartners. To hide the legislation from the public, the mandate language was buried in a hazardous waste bill. The other hepatitis B vaccine manufacturer, SmithKline Beecham, lobbied the House Health Committee. In previous years, Sen. Drake opposed legislation to restore vaccine informed consent to Ohio parents. Despite a 94-3 vote in the Ohio House favoring informed consent, Sen. Drake refused to hold hearings on the bill [effectively killing the bill] after its assignment to her committee).

[Paul A. Offit, MD Challenged to Debate]

Further, Merck consultant, vaccine patent holder and ACIP member Dr. Paul Offit of Philadelphia spoke at a recent American Legislative Exchange Councils meeting in Nashville. State lawmakers from around the country were treated to a well-rehearsed performance extolling the virtues of mandatory vaccination. Similar productions were staged during hepatitis B vaccine hearings in Ohio and Washington, D.C.

Who should make decisions about the vaccines & children, parents, doctors, legislators or vaccine manufacturers?

That is the issue. Special interests continue to push for mandatory vaccines for schoolchildren. Recently, in Ohio, it was the chicken pox vaccine (varicella). If the bill passes, chicken pox vaccine, manufactured in human fetal tissue, will be the ninth in the cocktail mix of vaccines required for school attendance.

In Ohio, at the urging of vaccine manufacturer Merck, Sen. Bruce Johnson introduced SB 254, which mandates the vaccine for schoolchildren in grades K-12. Ohio marks only one of Merck’s latest efforts to require chicken pox vaccine in every state a plan that would guarantee Merck annual sales of nearly $7 million for each new class of kindergartners in Ohio alone.

The fine print and informed consent.
Chicken pox vaccine is produced in lung tissue obtained from two surgically aborted human fetuses (Exp. Cell Res. 37:614-636, 1965; Nature 227:168-170, 1970). Merck’s own literature states the vaccine contains “residual components” of fetal lung cells. Informed consent, a basic tenet of ethical medical practice, dictates that citizens should have a choice whether or not they are injected with another person’s body cells. [Or anything else.]

Benefit lacking.
From the medical and health-care cost perspectives, chicken pox vaccine is a loser. Two studies, one funded by Merck, found that only if lost wages are included for a parent to stay home with a sick child is there cost advantage to using chicken pox vaccine (JAMA 271: 375-381, 1994; J. Ped. 124(6): 869-874, 1994).

While providing lifelong immunity, chicken pox disease [not vaccine] carries a very low risk of complications and death. Writing in the British medical journal, the Lancet (343: 1363, 1994), a voice of reason, Dr. Arthur Lavin, Department of Pediatrics, St. Luke’s Medical Center in Cleveland, Ohio, presented concerns that “argue strongly against the licensure of varicella vaccine for healthy children.” Lavin asserted: “[Chicken pox] is not major in the sense of disease mortality or morbidity. Therefore, if healthy children were fully vaccinated it is unclear in what significant way the health of the children or the economic health of their families would be improved.”

The vaccine industry has corrupted government policy. It’s about time lawmakers say “no” to drug company lobbyists and “yes” to informed consent.

Kristine M. Severyn, Ph.D

Kristine M. Severyn, Ph.D., is director of the Vaccine Policy Institute, 251 Ridgeway Dr., Dayton, OH 45459, 937-435-4750.

This article is from Well Being Journal, Spring 2001, Volume 10, #2 (out of print).

Related Articles

Family Vaccine Choices

Be Prepared to Answer Your Doctor

States Vote for Informed Consent to Vaccinate

Flu vaccine can cause febrile seizures

A pediatrician provides evidence why you might well reconsider rejecting vaccines

Bell Tolls for Swine Flu

Healthcare Professionals on Swine Flu Misinformation

Evidence Flu Vaccines Don’t Work

Swine Flu Not the Problem

HPV/Gardasil Vaccine Cautions

School vaccine exemptions

http://www.nvic.org/

Of other interest is “Influenza Vaccines: What’s in that Needle?” by Sherri J. Tenpenny, D.O., who lists flu vaccine ingredients that most of the vaccinated have never heard of and very well may not want in their bodies; in Well Being Journal, Volume 17, No. 4.

See also our special issue on Vaccines: Questioning Their Necessity and Governmental Mandates, various articles by researchers Kristine Severyn, Ph.D., Jane Orient, M.D., Barbara Brewitt, Ph.D., Joseph Mercola, D.O., Sherri Tenpenny, D.O., and others who all caution about vaccine use; in Well Being Journal, Volume 17, No. 2.

Free Newsletter

Join the Educate-Yourself Discussion Forum

All information posted on this web site is the opinion of the author and is provided for educational purposes only. It is not to be construed as medical advice. Only a licensed medical doctor can legally offer medical advice in the United States. Consult the healer of your choice for medical care and advice.