Overcoming the Japan Radiation Propaganda 'Tsunami' Is An Uphill Battle (May 2, 2012)

Educate-Yourself
The Freedom of Knowledge, The Power of Thought ©

Overcoming the Japan Radiation Propaganda 'Tsunami' Is An Uphill Battle

http://educate-yourself.org/lte/japanradiationpropagandatsunami02may12.shtml
May 2, 2012

Subject: Ken, is this a Psy-Op?
From: "Steve Campbell" <callstevec2@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, April 28, 2012
To: Ken Adachi

http://blog.imva.info/world-affairs/hanging-thread

[Fukushima related radiation doom & gloom screed from Mark Sircus]

***

Hi Steve,

Yes, I posted many articles from March 12, 2011 onwards, and did many radio shows in 2011, that addressed the subject of the Fukushima radiation scare psyops. The Illuminated Ones want to create fear about nuclear energy and get the public to demand the shutdown of nuclear plants and replace them with natural gas power plants using a new German Turbine design (you see why Merkle in Germany banned nuclear plants and will phase out all current nuke plants). You notice how this campaign dovetails with the fracking natural gas activity here in America and the development of a natural gas pipe lines from Russia into Turkey, Afghanistan, etc. There was no meltdown in Fukushima. See the articles I posted in March 2011. The whole scenario was staged. The first comment posted at the end of the Sircus promo piece talls the story.

Regards Ken

***
From: Steve Campbell <callstevec2@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Apr 30, 2012
Subject: Re: Ken, is this a Psy-Op?
To: Ken Adachi

Hi Ken,

Thanks for your reply. I was familiar with your work back in March, 2011, so I knew you were the right one to ask about this otherwise convincing story.

Here in western Colorado, we are in the belly of the natural gas fracking beast. From what I have seen here, fracking is indeed a big problem for our health, as it contaminates the water. People whose property have natural gas drilling rigs very near to their homes have to put up with noise, loss of air quality, the mentioned water degradation (to the point of being able to ignite their water in some instances), obvious direct correlation between the rigs and health issues (which the gas industry continues to deny) and on top of that, land devaluation, so that when forced due to health issues to move, they take a loss financially. Our three elected county commissioners (all Republicans) seem to be in bed with the gas industry. Many good folk have become more vocal in local politics as a result, myself included.

IF the power elite really wanted to help the world they would make the way clear for the development of Thorium nuclear power plants, which from what I've read are safe and efficient, as well as the plethora of alternative clean and economical power-generating inventions that have been suppressed.

Thanks again,
Steve

***

Subject: Fwd: Ken, Is this a Psy-Op?
From: "Steve Campbell" <callstevec2@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, May 1, 2012
To: Ken Adachi

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Lou
Date: Tue, May 1, 2012 at 12:11 PM
Subject: Re: Ken, Is this a Psy-Op?
To: Steve Campbell <callstevec2@gmail.com>

Dear Steve,

There were three meltdowns at Fukushima. See Gunderson. See Chris Busby, leading physicist in England. Your source is not sound. This is very serious. Fukushima bucky balls are traversing the 6000 mile ocean in Bukminister Fuller geometric shapes, holding Ur nanoparticles, that are being picked up by sea breeze and contaminating Central California where most of our vegetables are grown. Radiation levels of beta, gamma rays are skyrocketing in Los Angeles. Please check Michael Collins in Santa Monica who has down more than l500 readings of radiation levels since March 11, 20ll event of Fukushima. The levels of radiation in Los Angeles are 500 times above normal. Your source is in great error. Fukushima is the greatest disaster humanity has ever faced and we are looking at human extinction. Please check your sources and read what they have to say. I am truly shocked that you would fall for such absurdity.

Lou

***

Lou,

I have a lot of respect for Ken and his website educate-yourself.org Just go to http://educate-yourself.org/cn/index.shtml and scroll down.
You'll run into much information on the subject starting with this: Japan's 3/11/11 Mega 9.1 Earthquake: Another Illuminati Production? (Mar. 12, 2011)

Steve

***

Dear Steve,

No, this is absolutely bogus science. I am a respecter of the factual world and believe the greatest service to humanity is to deal with reality: your source is in denial. Check the sources I gave you and read and study. I am not able to fix anything and do not involve me with such liars.

Thanks. Lou

***

Hi Steve,

It would take a lot of time to put together a thorough rebuttal to the mountain of misinformation, disinformation, and outright fabrications that has flooded web sites like rense.com (which is awash with alarmist Fukushima radiation promoters like Arnie Gundersen, Christopher Busby, Lauren Moret, Yoichi Shimatsu, et. al). You would have to carefully review the statements made by each of these propagandists and counter their dire overstatements and exaggerations with contravening data. It's doable, but it would take more time than I have available right now.

However, I will remind you that I've already posted a number of articles last year decrying the misdirection and contrived evidence assembled by Busby, Gundersen, Moret, etc., in March, April, May, and June of 2011. In fact, my first article on the radiation scare topic was posted on March 19, 2011, just a few days following the Japan attack. Here's the link.

Japan Radiation Scare Hugely Overblown by Western Media (Mar. 19, 2011)
http://educate-yourself.org/cn/japanradiationlevels19mar11.shtml

I can present a brief response here, but a proper rebuttal would require a lot of time to assemble, and by necessity, be of considerable length.

There are plenty of people like Lou who accept the propaganda from radiation scare mongers like Busby or Gundersen or even Stephen C. Jones (who wildly claimed that "tons" of plutonium have been spewed into the atmosphere since the March 11 Japan attack) without critically examining any evidence on their OWN. They treat these guys as if they were High Lamas from the Oracle of Delphi who are incapable of uttering anything but unvarnished Truth. And of course, they ALL play the credentials game to anoint themselves with stature and pedigree--and authority.

Busby is now the "leading" physicist from London and Shimatsu is the "esteemed" journalist who used to write for the Japan Times, and Moret was the 'tenured scientist' who worked at Lawrence Livermore, yada, yada, yada.

Do you know how many "renowned" scientists, physicists, and engineers got in bed with the government and the NTSB in supporting the government's ludicrous cover story about the so-called planes bringing down the World Trade Center towers? And how about all of those "world acclaimed" climatologists and geophysicists who got in bed with the UN's IPCC to declare that Global Warming was a "non-debatable" threat, a "man-made" global crisis, when we all know by now that it's a completely contrived hoax to bring in mega-billions for the elites via their "carbon trading" schemes (at YOUR expense of course).

It's easy to alarm people when you use an expression such as "percentage" or "times" to represent a definitive quantity, as in a "500 %" increase in radiation in the Los Angeles area-- which I have no idea is true or not because I haven't had the chance to review Michael Collins Santa Monica radiation data, but let's accept that figure for now in the interest of conversation. The first thing to note is that background radiation readings vary from minute to minute, hour to hour, from station to station, and from day to day.

If, for example, I get a low background reading of 0.03 micro sieverts from one LA monitor at a given moment on a given day, and then I got another reading of 0.15 micro sieverts at another LA monitor on a different day, I could truthfully say that there was a 500 % increase in the background radiation level of Los Angeles, but that doesn't mean that it's a SUSTAINED 500 % increase in background radiation across Los Angeles on a 24/7 basis. That's a very important point to keep in mind.

If you read the unending alarmist headlines posted at rense.com of the worrisome "rising" radiation in Tokyo, you would think that the whole Tokyo population would be glowing by now, but when you look at the readings from the eight Tokyo radiation monitors maintained by the Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Public Health, a completely different picture emerges from the doom and gloom alarmism found at rense.com or globalresearch.ca

This link

http://monitoring.tokyo-eiken.go.jp/monitoring/past_data.html

will show you the daily readings in Tokyo from EIGHT radiation monitors evenly spaced across the Tokyo prefecture. The readings start on March 1, 2011 and continue daily up to the present date. It gives you the maximum reading from any one of the eight monitors, and the minimum reading, and the averaged mean for each day.

You will see that the average reading for Tokyo was 0.034 uGy/h (micro gray per hour, same as micro sieverts per hour) two weeks BEFORE March 11, 2011. The Background radiation didn't significantly rise in Tokyo until March 15, 2011 with an average reading of 0.109 uGy/hr. It then fell back to 0.05uGy/h range for about a week, and then rose again on March 23 2011 to the HIGHEST reading of 0.146 uGy/h to date yet recorded in Tokyo since the March 11, 2011 attack on Japan (that's important to note).

From March 23, 2011 to April 30, 2012, the background radiation readings in Tokyo have been slowly, but CONTINUOUSLY DROPPING to its April 30, 2012 averaged reading of 0.049 uGy/h, which is only 0.01 uGy/h higher than its PRE March 11, 2011 readings. Extrapolating from the rate of background radiation decline demonstrated on this chart, the background reading in Tokyo will likely match its PRE March 11, 2011 background radiation readings in roughly 5-6 months from now.

Now let's put our thinking caps on for a minute. Is it reasonable to assume that a nuclear power plant facility that is supposedly gushing out a huge volume of radiation ("tons" of plutonium according to Stephen C. Jones) from what Lou tells us were THREE reactors that had supposedly MELTED DOWN could cause a precipitous rise in background radiation in Los Angeles, which is 5,500 miles away, that's FIVE THOUSAND, FIVE HUNDRED MILES, traversing the entire width of the Pacific Ocean, but not have a similar and GREATER effect on Tokyo--which is only 136 miles away from Fukushima? Are the prevailing winds REALLY that conveniently selective, cooperative, and tightly compartmentalized?

Can you not see how absurd Lou's argument is?

Let me remind you of the main points I've been stressing about the March 11, 2011 attack on Japan starting with my first article posted on March 12, 2011, ONE day after the attack:

http://educate-yourself.org/cn/japanquakemanufactured12mar11.shtml

1. The "tsunami" was caused by the detonation of an undersea nuclear bomb that caused a sea surge, but not a genuine tsunami, similar to that reported by Joe Vialls with the December 26, 2004 Boxer Day, Sumatra "tsunami." The March 11, 2011 Japan undersea nuclear detonation caused a great volume of sea water that had surged onto the northern Japan coast to be highly radioactive and it naturally contaminated whatever the seawater had touched: land, people, buildings, fish, seaweed, etc.

2.There was no Richer 9 earthquake, otherwise there would have been thousands of buildings that would have crumbled into rubble and the people in northern Japan would not have been calmly walking around and driving their cars and trucks along coastal roads as the sea water surged in to overtake them - as we've all seen on the Youtube videos posted from Japan.

The largest quake (and there were many of them before, during, and after March 11) was likely in the 6.7 - 7.1 range. These quakes were being stimulated ARTIFICIALLY, in large measure, by spaced based weapon platforms (yes, I know I can't prove that).

3. The nuclear facility at Daiichi in Fukushima prefecture did not suffer any earthquake damage and very little (if any) flooding, but rather was intentionally SABOTAGED on March 11, 2011, The so-called 'hydrogen gas' explosion of reactor #3 was not an explosion of hydrogen gas, but rather an explosion caused by a mini nuclear device that was pre-planted in the Daiichi reactor facility. This was reported on my web site on March 14, 2011, TWO days after the Japan attack, by ZS Livingstone.

http://educate-yourself.org/zsl/japanreactorexplosions14mar11.shtml

4. I had previously reported on my web site and during radio interviews that radioactive iodine has been part of chemtrail spraying over North America for at least 5 years. The elevated readings in background radiation being reported in North America is not due to radiation from Fukushima, but rather from radiation particles being dropped with chemtrails. If there are 'Bucky balls' of radioactive particles being detected in the atmosphere of North America, then it's nano technology coming from chemtrail spray planes flying over our heads dumping their daily loads of toxins, and not from Fukushima, Japan.

By the way, the occasional report of elevated radioactive iodine or cesium in one or two isolated water supply sources for the Tokyo area that were in the news in the days and weeks following March 11, were also the products of sabotage, I believe.

The Japan radiation fear campaign is yet another Illuminated production, just like 9/11 or the January, 2011 Haiti (nuke-caused) earthquake. We are being deceived by PROPAGANDISTS working in the interest of promoting the Japan radiation psyops for the same Illuminated con artists who brought us Peak Oil, Global warming, the CO2 green house environmental 'crisis', melting arctic glaciers, soon-to-be-extinct polar bears, Global Warming-caused rising waters of small, low elevation islands, the "ozone hole" of the 1980s due to the escape of inexpensive CFCs to be conveniently replaced by Dupont's expensive refrigerant substitute, etc., etc., etc.

We're being played yet again and it's annoying to see so many people readily buy into the bin-Laden style cover story while simultaneously expressing disdain and indignation with the lone voice or two who suggests that it's an inside job.

It would be nice if a few other web sites besides mine, Ben Fulford, Jim Stone, and Dutchsinse at Youtube, took some initiative and researched for themselves the ample evidence available on the internet that easily disproves much of the hyped, alarmist radiation fear mongering coming from Shimatsu, Busby, Gundersen, Moret, Jones, et al.

Sincerely, Ken

Comments

Subject: *** about the Japan tsunami ***
From: Ingrid
Date: Thu, May 3, 2012
To: Ken Adachi

Ken -

Let me preface what I have to say by stating that I am the most unsophisticated person on earth when it comes to scientific arguments. I am a writer of some accomplishments, of German background, totally politically incorrect - but with a small number of subscribers and supporters, most of them of the WWII generation, now rapidly dying off.

(Not me .. I was a small child in WWI and hope I still have a few years left...)

I accidentally stumbled across your email regarding what you believe was not an earthquake but an underwater nuclear explosion. I happen to agree. I have for years brooded about the Indonesian tsunami because I have friends - serious and educated friends - who believe firmly that there has been a war being waged in the oceans for years and years between the Powers-that-be and the science remnants of the Third Reich "who got away" at the end of the war and are now hunkering down either on the backside of the moon or on Mars or wherever.

I make no claim to certainty.

I am simply stating that the folks who are claiming this hypothesis are serious, highly educated people who have political and diplomatic connections I could only dream of.

I have never heard this possibility discussed anywhere - openly. I write occasionally for Gordon Duff of Veterans Today, talking about this issue around the fringes, but I have never had independent verification - only talk by people I What say you?

Would you just laugh this off - or have you seriously considered this possibility? It would certainly make sense, given the enormous secrecy and disinformation about those blasted UFOs.

Ingrid, Ed.D

***

Subject: quick response to latest "Fuki" posting
From: Larry (Germany)
Date: Thu, May 3, 2012
To: Ken Adachi

Hi Ken,

Thank you for re-addressing this issue- it needs continuous re-addressing and trumpeted from the hills until people finally "get it"-

The US Senator (name escapes me now, probably because I have a hard time remembering names of Bozos) who just recently visited and was filmed at ground zero at good ole'"Fuki" telling everyone afterward how "devasting" the situation was, wore no protective clothing- neither did his entourage- so why weren't they all fried to a crisp if it is as bad as they report?-

but God forbid if they possibly picked up the Stuxnet virus and are now carriers... :-)

many regards,

Larry in Germany

***

Subject: I'm so happy.
From: Warren
Date: Thu, May 3, 2012
To: Ken Adachi

Me and a few of my friends have been having these thoughts and ideas for the past couple of years now, and until this moment I have read nothing as in depth and as close to what we are thinking than this. I want to meet and communicate with more people who feel this way, because it is the truth and I yearn for it.

If you ever do read this I just want to thank you for what you are doing and to know that when the time comes we exist throughout the world, ready to fight for what is truly right. As I'm writing this I am literally watching the weather change minute by minute and it's disgusting, if everyone could reach this level of awakening then maybe we could get it to stop, at least I hope so. Thank you for all you're doing, I can only hope one day I will have a plethora of knowledge such as yours to give me the same capability.

Cheers

Warren

Free Newsletter

Join the Educate-Yourself Discussion Forum

All information posted on this web site is the opinion of the author and is provided for educational purposes only. It is not to be construed as medical advice. Only a licensed medical doctor can legally offer medical advice in the United States. Consult the healer of your choice for medical care and advice.