On Devember 28, I saw a Fukushima radiation hysteria article titled " Fukushima Radiation Hits San Francisco! (Dec 2013) "
posted to my Yahoo E-Y discussion forum on Dec. 28, 2013 by a forum member named Greko. It was yet another Japan radiation hysteria article among dozens posted to the internet daily by either paranoid, uninformed individuals (as in this case), or are propaganda presentations (E.g. enenews.com), intended to deceive. This posting referred to a Youtube video (shown further below) taken by a man named "Dave" on December 23, 2013 at a beach near San Mateo (in northern California) called Surfer's Beach. So far, Dave's video has registered 353,000 views since he posted it on December 24 (undoubtedly greatly helped by Jeff Rense's promotion of the video and its sensational title).
Dave uses the Youtube name of Kill0Your0TV. Dave has 20 Fukushima radiation "the-sky-is-falling" videos posted at his Youtube index page. He's obviously a believer in the contrived Fukushima radiation hysteria campaign launched by the
Illuminati in the immediate wake of the sabotage events carried out with mini tactical nukes at the Daiichi Nuclear Power Station in Fukushima prefecture between March 11- 14, 2011. Just for the record, there was NO forty foot high wall of water that inundated and "knocked out" the Daiichi power station on March 11 as many mindless internet twits regurgitate endlessly. In fact, there was no tidal wave that hit any shore of Japan on March 11, 2011. There was ONLY a sea surge (as can be plainly seen in all of the videos that were shown on Japamese TV) caused by the rapid creation of steam due to the undersea nuclear detonations that took place in the Sea of Japan on March 11th, 2011 and caused the so-called "9.0 earthquake" described by the Zionist-owned lametream media (the magnitude of the event was nowhere nearRichter 9.0, otherwise thousands of buildings all over Japan {and people} would have immediately been knocked down to the ground).
The comments posted to the above linked article were partly embellished by AlexandraBruce who has a web site called ForbiddenKnowldgeTV (which is tilted towards looming catastrophism), and partly a re-pasting of the comments which Dave posted on his Youtube page. In this article, I'll examine the Youtube comments of Dave, who took the giger counter-reading video at Surfer's Beach, Alexandra Bruce, and the unfounded presumptions of Uber Fukushima Radiation Fear Meister, Jeff Rense of rense.com, who posted Dave's video along with his own commentary on December 28, 2013
First, let's look at Dave's video and his Youtube comments:
Fukushima radiation hits San Francisco! (Dec 2013)
This shocking video was taken December 23rd 2013 with a quality Geiger Counter south of Pacifica State Beach (Surfers Beach) California.
Background radiation reading is 30 CPM. Near the ocean it's 150 CPM. The moister coming from the ocean waves seems to be what makes the Geiger Counter jump up 5X. This is not normal at all. More thorough readings need to be done. Where is the useless government/media? Thanks to rense.com for originally publishing this video.
Original video source:
http://www.rense.com/general96/radiat...
Massive starfish deaths on West Coast:
http://www.naturalnews.com/043271_sta...
http://www.news1130.com/2013/12/30/st...
All sardines gone from West Coast of BC:
http://www.vancouversun.com/travel/Su...
Bald eagles dying in Western US:
http://enenews.com/high-alert-mystery...
Unprecedented declines in Alaska and BC salmon:
http://enenews.com/newspaper-is-fukus...
Real-time radiation monitoring for North America:
http://www.radiationnetwork.com
NOTE: The Radiation Network website, for example, uses a threshold warning level of 100 CPM, mainly because it is unusual to observe levels of 100 or higher without something more going on in the area than just background level.
From the Inspector Geiger Counter's user manual: "CPM (or CPS) and total counts are the most direct methods of measurement; mR/hr (or uSv/hr) is calculated using a conversion factor optimized for Cesium-137, so this mode is less accurate for other radionuclides, unless you have calibrated the "geiger counter" for a specific radionuclide using an appropriate source. It is more appropriate to measure alpha and beta activity using CPM than using mR/hr. Conversion for alpha and beta emitters is calcuated differently, and the "geiger counters" reading in mR/hr may not be accurate."
***
Comment from Ken Adachi: Anyone with a brain watching this video can see that Dave has deluded himself into believing that the higher background Geiger counter CPM reading over the beach sand is due to radioactive contamination from Fukushima. That's absurd. Fukushima Japan is 6,000 miles away, on the other side of the world (look at a globe). That beach sand would have demonstrated the same radiation CPM reading had it been taken on March 10, 2011 or any other date prior to the March 11, 2011 attack on Japan. The real problem here is that Dave is paranoid, already biased towards the Fukushima radiation hysteria mind set so thoroughly showcased at rense.com, that he went down to the beach with his nifty $565 Inspector pancake style Geiger counter and his video camera to confirm his worst fears of 99 CPM "alarm" readings (that he set his Geiger counter to trip at) - which he just knowsis coming from Japan. But he couldn't get readings above 50, or 75, or 99 CPM at his home, or in his neighborhood, or anywhere else in that part of California, except at the beach, where FINALLY the smoking gun evidence is right there - on the beach - for all to see!
Dave is greatly alarmed by the "5X" jump from normal 30 CPM background radiation levels due to "The moister [sic] coming from the ocean waves..." However, if you watch the video carefully, you will notice at the 4:04 minute mark, that Dave starts walking towards the edge of the water and describes how the CPM reading is now dropping down to the 40 or 50 range, the closer he gets to the water. It never occurs to Dave that his presumption that the CPM readings is due to "The moister [sic] coming from the ocean waves..." is simply illogical based on this observation alone. The moisture or water vapor coming from the "ocean waves" would equally interpenetrate the entire region, not just the central part of the beach where he's getting the higher readings.
The higher CPM radiation readings are coming from the sand, and not from the moisture in the air.
Many different types of rock, igneous particularly, have natural radioactivity. Granite is the best known example. Radioactive trace minerals can be found on beaches or in soils anywhere in the world.
"Radioactivity in minerals are caused by the inclusion of naturally-occurring radioactive elements in the mineral's composition. The degree of radioactivity is dependent on the concentration and isotope present in the mineral. For the most part, minerals that contain potassium (K), uranium (U), and thorium (Th) are radioactive."
"Minerals which contain Rare Earth Elements (REE) are generally more radioactive because thorium is commonly substituted for one or more of these REE."
"Radioactive accessory minerals such as zircon may contribute to the radioactivity of a mineral which is otherwise non-radioactive by calculation. Many granites or other igneous rocks contain some radioactivity because of minor, but highly radioactive, accessory minerals."
Another factor to consider in this "shocking" video is the radiation scale being quoted. Counts Per Minute (CPM) is a quick and easy scale to give you a general idea of the overall radiation picture. However, the Inspector Geiger counter used here is capable of detecting all 4 types of ionizing radiation which include alpha, beta, X-ray, and gamma radiation. Alpha radiation is relatively harmless as it can only travel 6 inches in air and is easily stopped by a piece of paper or clothing. Beta radiation is more penetrating, but it is absorbed by only a few feet of air. The greatest concern for damaging biological effects from ionizing radiation is from gamma radiation, but gamma radiation is usually only emitted by the well known radio nuclides such as plutonium or uranium and not the sort of natural radioactive elements found in sand along the seashore. The CPM scale does not distinguish between an ionizing event from alpha, beta, or gamma waves. It just a total count of ANY ionizing wave which would include cosmic rays that bombard the earth constantly from outer space. Therefore, a high CPM reading of 412 just a couple of inches above the sand which Dave recorded at the same beach on Dec. 19, 2013 does not mean that the beach was contaminated from Fukushima, nor does it necessarily mean that it's dangerous or worrisome if 80 or 90% of the radiation being detected is coming from alpha waves. You can read more about Radiation in Nature here.
There are many populated areas on this planet where the normal background radiation level ir well above 500 CPM and the local residents are not dropping like flies from radiation poisoning. Kerala, India, Ramsar in Iran, Guarapari in Brazil, Karunagappalli in India, Arkaroola, South Australia and Yangjiang in China are well known as regions of unusually high background radiation.
Here's what the Ubermeister of Fukushima Doom & Gloom hysteria promotion, Jeff Rense had to say about Dave's "shocking" Geiger counter discovery at Surfer's Beach:
The following video was taken on 12-24-13 with an Inspector Plus geiger counter by 'Dave' giving readings on a Northern California beach due West of San Mateo. The beach is south of Princeton Harbor which in turn is just south of Pillar Point where 'Mavericks' big surf comes in. The best description is the San Mateo Coast. Just south again from Princeton Harbor begins the City of Half Moon Bay.
As you will see, the normal background radiation above the small bluff at this beach is about 30 CPM (Counts Per Minute).
The video is self-explanatory and we are greatly indebted to Dave for making it and sending it in. Today's readings on the beach were taken standing up...with the Inspector about 5 feet off the ground.
On Thursday, 12-19, four days earlier, Dave went to the same beach but with a plastic bag for his Inspector. He placed it down about 2 inches above the sand and got radioactive readings of 412 Counts Per Minute (CPM)..over 13 TIMES NORMAL BACKGROUND of 30 CPM. See the readout chart below...
***
In mid November of this year, Devon from San Diego sent me an email that began:
"We found a piece of Fukushima (Daiichi nuclear facility) fear mongering from October 23, 2013 at Rense.com entitled "Japan's Theater Of The Nuclear Absurd". The author,Richard Wilcox Ph.D. throws around scary sounding numbers starting with the first paragraph stating, "Fukushima nuclear power plant no. 1 (FNPP#1) is leaking upwards 160 billion becquerels of radiation into the ocean every day, including cesium, strontium and who knows what else on a list of 'dangerous isotopes' (2)."
A few days later, I'm happy to report, Rense took the Wilcox article down, obviously embarrassed by Devon's ability to think for himself and refute the specious nonsense generated by just one of the many Fukushima radiation "authorities" featured at rense.com (I'd be curious to see if Jeff also takes down his Dec. 28 posting on Dave's video after the analysis I've presented here gets around :-).
In the links under Dave's Youtube video, he includes articles about sardines and eagles, starfish and salmon, all supposedly dying off at a rapid pace due to the non-existent radiation pouring out of Fukushima. Alexandra Bruce also jumps on the disappearing sardine bandwagon as indicative of Fukushima poisoning.
In Part 2, however, I will review and analyze the very articles they point to as "proof" of Fukushima radiation poisoning and show that the articles themselves make no allusion or reference to Fukushima as a causative factor in anything, but rather refer to 20 year on and 40 year off natural cycle of sardine fishing in the waters off British Columbia. And contrary to the lies posted at Dave's link to enenews.com, the salmon harvest in the Pacific Northwest is experiencing an all time BOOM in population. More salmon are returning to spawning streams in Washington, Oregon and British Columbia than were seen in recent years. Millions of people are being brainwashed by sensational headlines and specious, inaccurate propaganda articles about a Fukushima radiation "disaster" that simply does not exist.
Since March of 2011, I've posted at least 35 or 40 articles debunking the myth of Fukushima radiation as having any influence at all on the people, fish, or atmosphere of North America. Fukushima radiation hysteria is a an Illuminati contrivedpsy-ops. just like Global Warming and Peak Oil were contrived out of whole cloth, having no basis in reality.
A frequent mantra you hear from Fukushima radiation hysteria promoters is the false allegation that Fukushima was worst than Chernobyl. That's simply not true, as this video will demonstrate.
Fukushima and Chernobyl: Myth versus Reality
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qaEKfPlCL_4
Myth: Nuclear Energy and Radiation Will Kill You?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=mOVdqh22ohk Published on Jun 28, 2012
All information posted on this web site is
the opinion of the author and is provided for educational purposes only.
It is not to be construed as medical advice. Only a licensed medical doctor
can legally offer medical advice in the United States. Consult the healer
of your choice for medical care and advice.