Rick Stanley's High Noon Part 1, Part 2, Part 3

By Rick Stanley <rick@stanley2002.org>
http://educate-yourself.org/cn/rickstanleyhighnoon4patterson9jul03.shtml
July 9, 2003

Subject: If only I Was Black; The Media Would Cover the Injustice

Rick Stanley, Constitutional Activist and former 2002 US SENATE Candidate, gave the following written release to the media.:

"I couldn't help but wonder aloud, that if I was black, then the media would cover the injustice." Rick Stanley, who was reading about the FEDERAL PROBE SOUGHT as the headline in the Rocky Mountain News, openly ponders this question. Why is a story about a rogue judge in Denver, specifically Judge Robert Patterson, who has issued a bench warrant for Rick Stanley, illegally and unlawfully, not being investigated by the media? He is black.

The Police Department has issued an Armed and Dangerous report and the FBI has admitted they are investigating Stanley as well. What is this all about?

Stanley has been demonstrating in front of the Colorado Supreme Court and around the Denver area with a sign that says, "COWARDS COMMITTING TREASON: DENVER & COLORADO JUDGES ARE VIOLATING THEIR OATH OF OFFICE: RICK STANLEY DEMANDS HIS CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS BE UPHELD". Stanley has been accused by a Colorado Supreme Court employee of brandishing a weapon, and when it is discovered after 2 hours of being arrested, this is not the case, Stanley is released, no charges, no apology, no investigation of the woman at the Colorado Supreme Court for her lie and unlawful action resulting in Stanley being arrested with eight police officers pointing guns at Stanley. Based upon the history of the Denver Police Department and their horrendous record of killing suspects by "accident" or just on purpose and then covering up with excuses, with no charges ever being filed, is it any wonder that Stanley does not trust the judicial branch of government and the Denver Police Department that is harrassing him and now hunting for Stanley to make an arrest.

Stanley has a case that was originally in Denver Judge Robert Patterson's courtroom in 2002, and he was convicted of exercising his State and National Constitutional right to openly carry anywhere in the state of Colorado including Denver. The courts in Denver did not, and still do not recognize that right, even though the legislature and Governor of Colorado affirmed that right with SB-25 on March 18, 2003, and with that legislation made a state law banning the cities of Colorado from violating the State Constitution right of open carry of a weapon on your person.

The new SB-25 just affirmed what the State Constitution already said. Now it is being observed by the police in Colorado and Denver, but the courts are still ignoring this fact. Stanley's case is now appealed lawfully, with all fees paid, to the Colorado Court of Appeals, which means by the courts own rules that Stanley can not be brought back to the original jurisdiction of Judge Patterson's court during the appeal process for any reason regarding this case. A stay of execution is in effect from Judge Patterson at the sentencing hearing which was secured by Stanley's paid $2,500.00 appeal bond.

Judge Patterson has tried to bring Stanley back to hiscourt twice now to revoke the Stay of Execution for his 6 month jail sentence, fines, probation, community service, etc. He brought Stanley back in March, and threatened to revoke the Stay of Execution and told Stanley he must get a Stay from the Colorado Supreme Court, who was considering hearing the case, and when the Colorado Supreme Court issued a Stay of Execution, Judge Patterson did not lift his Stay of Execution, but made Stanley think he was going to.

Stanley filed for his appeal bond bond money of $2,500.00 with Judge Patterson on May 29th, 2003, with an IN REM BOND CLAIM ON LAND VERIFIED CLAIM TO BOND and was turned down because the bond was supposedly securing the Stay of Execution Judge Patterson had originally agreed to. The Stay of Execution from Judge Patterson had never been lifted and Stanley did not need a Stay of Exectuion from the Colorado Supreme Court while on Appeal. When the Colorado Supreme Court refused to hear Stanley's Writ of Certorari, and ended their Stay of exectuion, Stanley filed an appeal to the Colorado Court of Appeals, because the Colorado Supreme Court refused to hear the case. Stanley filed the new appeal within 30 days of the Colorado Supreme Courts refusal, keeping his appeal efforts alive.

Judge Patterson issued an order for Stanley to appear in his courtroom in Denver on June 26th, 2003, which Stanley answered with a Petition and Motion to Dismiss because Judge Patterson does not have jurisdiction over Stanley regarding this case until the appeal process is exhausted. Stanley has already said he will take the case to the Supreme Court of the Land if all his other appeals are exhausted. Stanley is awaiting decision on the Colorado Court of Appeals now. The Federal Court of Appeals would be his next step if this appeal is denied in Colorado... All of this time the Stay of Execution is bonded by the $2,500.00 paid in full bond by Stanley. Hold on now. Here comes Denver Judge Patterson, saying that Stanley's appeal is over because, Judge Patterson says it is. Judge Patterson says the Stay of Execution is over from the Colorado Supreme Court, because they won't hear the case. Judge Patterson says come back to my court so I can intiate your sentence.

One problem: Stanleys case is on paid appeal at the Colorado Court of Appeals now. Doesn't matter to Judge Patterson, he will order the hearing knowing he doesn't have jurisdiction while on appeal, and he will ignore the fact that his original Stay of Execution is still in effect, bonded by the original bond of $2,500.00 paid by Stanley, and Judge Patterson also refused to release that same bond because it was securing the Stay of Execution he granted in the first place. Stanley doesn't go because he doesn't have to by the law, (their rules not Stanley's rules) and Judge Patterson ignores his own Colorado Rules of Law and enters a Bench Warrant for Stanley.

Is this terrific or what? Stanley can't demonstrate with his sign anymore because he has a Bench Warrant out for his arrest, so no more embarrassing phone calls to the judiciary about Stanley's sign. Stanley can't wear his weapon everywhere around Denver as he has since March 18, 2003, demonstrating that it is not a danger to the public and in fact secures Stanley's rights and security, and if need be, could be used to defend Stanley's life or the life of another from a REAL criminal. Solves two dilemnas for the City of Denver and the judiciary being used to pummel the citizenry of Denver, not to mention Stanley. Judicial abuse? One other thing: Stanley refuses to be arrested for a bogus warrant and any other bogus charges. Whoopee!!! Now the City of Denver can start harassing Stanley and his employess on their way to work with illegal stops, called investigations, even though the driver has done nothing to warrant being pulled over except be an employee of Stanley's Stanley Fastener and Shop Supply. Now we can plan a swat team arrest or killing of Stanley and it is all the fault of that wild eyed crazy gun toting militia guy, Rick Stanley. Stanley has never harmed anyone before. Never even pointed any of his weapons at anyone. Having a weapon has defused situations regarding Stanley being threatened before in his life with criminals carrying guns and knives and threatening Stanley with bodily harm. Just the fact that Stanley was armed in the past has defused many potentially life threatening situations against Stanley and his property. That is what a legal defensive weapon is for. ]

The Colorado Court of Appeals has a Petiton and Motion to Vacate Lower Court Bench Warrant and Hearing since June 27, 2003, and yet, strangely, there is only silence from the Colorado Court of Appeals on the matter. They have 30 days to answer this matter and each day is a life threatening situation to Stanley from the Denver Police Department. Yesterday in Michigan, a police officer was killed while trying to illegally enter a man's home and serve a warrant for SUSPICIoN of SEXUAL ASSAULT, a felony warrant placed by a 16 year old girl. The man's home was burned down and they thought the man was in the fire caused by the police Helicopter and Tank which was assaulting the home along with the swat team. One officer was killed and yet the man who owned the home was not there at the time. He now has an APB out for his arrest. This is commen police tactics. So is the drugging of an activist in San Diego yesterday by the police there. None of this gets covered by the media. Stanley's case has been totally ignored. They are just waiting for the coup de grace of the swat team entering Stanley's property which will set off a chain of events. The cities chain of events goes like this: Police swat team breaks down Stanley's door in the middle of the night and swat team enters armed to the teeth. Stanley defends himself from this illegal entry and defends himself from attack. Shots are fired, Stanley is killed. Another psycho gun toting crazy man is dead. Hooray for the police. Media writes that story and that is the way it is.

Only problem with this is: It is all done fraudulently to begin with. What started all this? Stanley exercising, peacefully his right to openly keep and bear arms on the 210th Birthday of the Bill of Rights on December 15, 2002, and is arrested by 18 police officers and swat team members of the Denver Police Department. A man who actually has the audacity to exercise his Constitutional rights is arrested, and thus starts the road to destruction at the hands of thugs with guns in government.

The second scenario is the same except one thing: Stanley repels the invadors of his property because he is skilled with the use of weaponry and has the firepower to withstand the assault. Stanley calls out the Mutual Defense Pact Militia of the 2d American Revolution at this time and holds the aggressors at bay until hundreds of armed militia citizens of America arrive each day to defend their brother militia member. The stand off gets larger. More and more militia members and Patriots from across America heed the call. Hundreds turn into thousands. The city and the Governor get involved and the situation escalates. Thousands of angry armed Americans will know of the transgressions against Stanley. Colorado becomes a battleground.

All because a Colorado citizen by the name of Rick Stanley decided to exercise his God given, Constitutionally protected and guaranteed right to openly carry a gun on his hip in celebration of the 210th birthday of the Bill of Rights on December 15, 2002. What is going to happen? The Governor has been contacted with phone calls, e-mails and letters trying to get a pardon to end this entire fiasco that the jduicial branch of the government refuses to address because it is politically charged and Denver is not happy. What is going to happen?

The judiciary is ignoring this so they can be rid of Stanley and his accusations.

We will see.

Rick Stanley
Constitutional Activist
Phone: 303-329-0481
E-mail: rick@stanley2002.org